twooffour said:

Gaffer Tape said:

No, Frink! You can't say things like that! If you say you didn't read a post, or almost didn't read a post, or read a post on the wrong day of the week, or read a post in a way he didn't like you to read the post, or read the Saturday Evening Post, he's going to have ammunition to invalidate everything you say for the rest of your life.

Oh... like he wasn't going to do that anyway.

I admit I don't hear any hillbilly or ten year old voices, but I do register a monotonous buzzing whenever I read any of his quote pyramid rants, and it does tend to give one a headache.

I laughed when reading this, but on a serious note (only because you're seemingly not getting it):

Yea, that's it in a nutshell, basically.

Ooooh, so that means you've read all 7,000+ posts I've made? You've read all my contributions on other forums? You've read my personal diary? You've read the novel I've written? You obviously haven't read my contribution that C3PX encouraged you to seek out a minute ago. And you say you don't very well remember the conversation we had when you first joined. How can you possibly be expected to contribute to this conversation if you aren't completely up to date on every single thing I've ever said? You would just look stupid to those who are.

So I guess that means I have grounds now to invalidate everything you've said and everything you're going to say because you obviously haven't come to this debate prepared enough to really know what you're talking about. ^_^

EDIT: Oh, crap! I just realized that, in an effort to not have my quote box all cluttered up, that I didn't quote twooffour's entire post and respond to it line by line. That means he's going to assume I only read the portion I quoted! And since his opinions are always factual, I guess I'm screwed! It must be true, even though I know differently!