logo Sign In

The Phantom Menace - general discussion thread — Page 8

Author
Time

Just a quick note to say I agree with 2/4-

There is a qualitative difference between the "romp" style fun of ID4, MiB, ANH and others and the unintentional camp of TPM.

Perhaps not everyone can see that difference.  But 2/4 seems to be going nuts thinking he's the only one that can see it.  I can see it too.

IT'S MY TRILOGY, AND I WANT IT NOW!

"[George Lucas] rebooted the franchise in 1997 without telling anyone." -skyjedi2005

"Yeah, well, George says a lot of things..." a young 1997 xhonzi on RASSM

"They're my movies." -George Lucas. 19 people won oscars for their work on Star Wars (1977) and George Lucas wasn't one of them.

Rewrite the Prequels!

 

Author
Time

xhonzi said:

Perhaps not everyone can see that difference.  But 2/4 seems to be going nuts thinking he's the only one that can see it.  I can see it too.

Shhhhhhhhh, don't tell him - let him go nuts!

Author
Time

xhonzi said:

Just a quick note to say I agree with 2/4-

There is a qualitative difference between the "romp" style fun of ID4, MiB, ANH and others and the unintentional camp of TPM.

Perhaps not everyone can see that difference.  But 2/4 seems to be going nuts thinking he's the only one that can see it.  I can see it too.

Heh, now we two have conspired against zombie, eh? ;)
I think PoC is fun :D

Imo, the actually entertaining "camp" (as well as genuine silly "fun") is almost all in RotS - the clichéd one-liners, the OTT villains, etc. - in TPM, there are many attempts at fun and humor, but most of it ends up being either unfunny, or cringe-worthy :D

Author
Time
 (Edited)

twooffour said:

xhonzi said:

Just a quick note to say I agree with 2/4-

There is a qualitative difference between the "romp" style fun of ID4, MiB, ANH and others and the unintentional camp of TPM.

Perhaps not everyone can see that difference.  But 2/4 seems to be going nuts thinking he's the only one that can see it.  I can see it too.

Heh, now we two have conspired against zombie, eh? ;)
I think PoC is fun :D

Imo, the actually entertaining "camp" (as well as genuine silly "fun") is almost all in RotS - the clichéd one-liners, the OTT villains, etc.

If you think entertaining camp and silly fun = cringe inducing awfulness, then sure, I guess.

Author
Time

TV's Frink said:

twooffour said:

xhonzi said:

Just a quick note to say I agree with 2/4-

There is a qualitative difference between the "romp" style fun of ID4, MiB, ANH and others and the unintentional camp of TPM.

Perhaps not everyone can see that difference.  But 2/4 seems to be going nuts thinking he's the only one that can see it.  I can see it too.

Heh, now we two have conspired against zombie, eh? ;)
I think PoC is fun :D

Imo, the actually entertaining "camp" (as well as genuine silly "fun") is almost all in RotS - the clichéd one-liners, the OTT villains, etc.

If you think entertaining camp and silly fun = cringe inducing awfulness, then sure, I guess.

The "cringe inducing" was referring to TPM, in case you missed that - as to the stuff in EpIII, well, I happen to like most of it in that way. If you find that "cringe inducing awfulness", then obviously you don't see any "unintentional camp" in those parts ;)

Author
Time

twooffour said:

TV's Frink said:

twooffour said:

xhonzi said:

Just a quick note to say I agree with 2/4-

There is a qualitative difference between the "romp" style fun of ID4, MiB, ANH and others and the unintentional camp of TPM.

Perhaps not everyone can see that difference.  But 2/4 seems to be going nuts thinking he's the only one that can see it.  I can see it too.

Heh, now we two have conspired against zombie, eh? ;)
I think PoC is fun :D

Imo, the actually entertaining "camp" (as well as genuine silly "fun") is almost all in RotS - the clichéd one-liners, the OTT villains, etc.

If you think entertaining camp and silly fun = cringe inducing awfulness, then sure, I guess.

The "cringe inducing" was referring to TPM, in case you missed that...

I was talking about ROTS.

Author
Time

TV's Frink said:

twooffour said:

TV's Frink said:

twooffour said:

xhonzi said:

Just a quick note to say I agree with 2/4-

There is a qualitative difference between the "romp" style fun of ID4, MiB, ANH and others and the unintentional camp of TPM.

Perhaps not everyone can see that difference.  But 2/4 seems to be going nuts thinking he's the only one that can see it.  I can see it too.

Heh, now we two have conspired against zombie, eh? ;)
I think PoC is fun :D

Imo, the actually entertaining "camp" (as well as genuine silly "fun") is almost all in RotS - the clichéd one-liners, the OTT villains, etc.

If you think entertaining camp and silly fun = cringe inducing awfulness, then sure, I guess.

The "cringe inducing" was referring to TPM, in case you missed that...

I was talking about ROTS.

as to the stuff in EpIII, well, I happen to like most of it in that way. If you find that "cringe inducing awfulness", then obviously you don't see any "unintentional camp" in those parts ;)

Author
Time

Whatever you'll need me to do, I'm always there!

Author
Time

Just rewatched Men in Black, and gee, it's easy to forget just how fun that movie is!
So genuinely funny, refreshing and entertaining. The main characters are spot-on, all the supporting characters are awesome, tons of hilarious quotable dialogue, not a single moment of artificial kitsch that makes you wanna /facepalm, and just enough involvement and menace to prevent it from being a complete OTT farce like Austin Powers (which was awesome and hilarious as such, too).

Just a great, great movie. Independence Day with its hammy patriotism, stereotype characters and occasional melodrama, can get annoying at places, and TPM is just way out of league.

I'm sorry, M0m, think next time before you post :D

Author
Time

I like hats

<span style=“font-weight: bold;”>The Most Handsomest Guy on OT.com</span>

Author
Time
 (Edited)

toho-scope said:

http://youtu.be/eBKfFycVjeI
news report an hour before the premier of TPM, interviews with GL,rick mcallum and cast, and some interesting views from thosenot going to the film
enjoy

 

 I want to punch 1999 Jake Lloyd in the face ...

just look at 2:41 & his "I´m a movie star" attitude

 

Am I a bad person ?

 

 

Author
Time

Kurt said:

toho-scope said:

http://youtu.be/eBKfFycVjeI
news report an hour before the premier of TPM, interviews with GL,rick mcallum and cast, and some interesting views from thosenot going to the film
enjoy

 

 I want to punch 1999 Jake Lloyd in the face ...

just look at 2:41 & his "I´m a movie star" attitude

 

Am I a bad person ?

 

 

Nope. I want to beat the living shit out of him too.

<span style=“font-weight: bold;”>The Most Handsomest Guy on OT.com</span>

Author
Time

Jake Lloyd the Amazing One Film Wonder said:

He is an AMAZING director! He gets the utmost performance out of EVERY actor he works with! And he is the NICEST guy!


LOL His inflection makes me ROTFLMAO

Author
Time

Kurt said:

I want to punch 1999 Jake Lloyd in the face ...

Am I a bad person ?

Only if you don't say "Yippee!" as your fist connects with his face.

Since they're like poetry, what with the rhyming and all, I find that I only need to watch three out of the six films.

Author
Time
 (Edited)

Having just sat through something* that is argualby (mostly) the Phantom Menace... and this being the first time in 6 years I've watched any of TPM...  Well...

Most of you know I'm an ardent PT hater.  Many of you may also know that I bear no fondness for TPM, Watto, Quigonn, film grain, or any of the other "redeeming" qualities that many see in this movie.  I consider TPM to be the objective worst of PT (even if I found RotS more subjectively disappointing- only because my hopes were higher (though it wasn't surprising(my hopes were tempered by fears (which were met(parenthetically speaking)))))... but years of "not watching it" have made me forget all but my reaction to it.  Many of you say you like it- to a degree- and that its high points almost outweigh the low.  And I've learned to understand that people just have different opinions on the matter.

But I just watched (mostly) it again.  And all I can say is that it is far more terrible than I recall and I can't understand how anyone could see anything redeeming in this movie.

Perhaps I'm being too swayed by the fan-edit... perhaps I'm not evaluating the real TPM... but I don't think so...  I may not remember how every scene in the original TPM went... but I think I'm not too far off.

This is a bad, bad movie.  And I'm embarassed for anyone involved in the making of it. 

I can't begin to understand the perspective that there's anything redeeming about it.  Sorry if that offends.

IT'S MY TRILOGY, AND I WANT IT NOW!

"[George Lucas] rebooted the franchise in 1997 without telling anyone." -skyjedi2005

"Yeah, well, George says a lot of things..." a young 1997 xhonzi on RASSM

"They're my movies." -George Lucas. 19 people won oscars for their work on Star Wars (1977) and George Lucas wasn't one of them.

Rewrite the Prequels!

 

Author
Time
 (Edited)

Qui-gon, Obi-wan, Watto, Shmi, Duel of the Fates (music and lightsaber action), real film including grain, the battle droids (when they aren't talking), the score, Ric Olie...there's a lot I like about TPM.  I wouldn't have bothered with TRM if I didn't find some redeeming qualities to TPM.

I'd much rather watch TPM than AOTC any day.  And maybe ROTS too.

Having said that, fan edits definitely cloud my judgement.  It's easy to forgive Jar-Jar when I'm watching a version that cuts him out as much as possible.

Author
Time

TV's Frink said:

Qui-gon, Obi-wan, Watto, Shmi, Duel of the Fates (music and lightsaber action), real film including grain, the battle droids (when they aren't talking), the score, Ric Olie...there's a lot I like about TPM. 

I understand but I DON'T UNDERSTAND!

IT'S MY TRILOGY, AND I WANT IT NOW!

"[George Lucas] rebooted the franchise in 1997 without telling anyone." -skyjedi2005

"Yeah, well, George says a lot of things..." a young 1997 xhonzi on RASSM

"They're my movies." -George Lucas. 19 people won oscars for their work on Star Wars (1977) and George Lucas wasn't one of them.

Rewrite the Prequels!

 

Author
Time

xhonzi said:

Having just sat through something* that is argualby (mostly) the Phantom Menace... and this being the first time in 6 years I've watched any of TPM...  Well...

Most of you know I'm an ardent PT hater.  Many of you may also know that I bear no fondness for TPM, Watto, Quigonn, film grain, or any of the other "redeeming" qualities that many see in this movie.  I consider TPM to be the objective worst of PT.

 But I just watched (mostly) it again.  And all I can say is that it is far more terrible than I recall and I can't understand how anyone could see anything redeeming in this movie.

 

it is interesting to hear people say that TPM is the best or 'most star wars like' and cite the film grain as one of the reasons.  I guess its kinda like how some people don't like Diamonds are Forever because it has such a plain look to it compared to the 60s Bond movies. If the reports Im hearing about TPM blu ray are correct,  I wonder if this will still be the case.

I saw TPM last year for the first time in several years.  while the tatooine setting is cozy and familiar and the 10 seconds of the obi-wan/darth maul duel is cool, and farts/midicolorions/virgin birth/2 headed sportscaster no longer make me gag, my view has not changed;  save for the production values, this is the worst movie i have ever seen (yes, I saw Gigli and Godzilla ).  Jar Jar and Jake Lloyd were the least of TPMs problems. :(

In 1999, I was startled when reports started  to leak that the movie wasn't good.  But it wasn't until i was flipping thru the "Making of Episode I" book and on the last page, Lucas says "Like Star Wars, for every person that likes it, 3 will hate it" that I KNEW the movie was going to suck.  I mean, who the hell ends a "making of" movie book like that?! Answer: someone that knows damn well they just made the biggest POS of all time and is trying to pre-emptively defuse the fallout.  And Im sure we are remember those wonderful interviews of lucas blabbing on and on about how Studio Suits have a vendetta against him, Theatre owners hate him, everyone hates him, nobody ever liked Star Wars, the Media hates him, the OT was always bad, 'I made it bad on purpose' etc etc.

whats hilarious on the DVD commentary, the VERY SECOND episode I starts, Lucas immediately says "so this is episode I and you have to remember this is just the first episode".  how inspiring...

It was the same thing for IJATKOTCS. in that vanity fair article, Lucas is whining that everyone hates him and internet critics are fully ready to trash the movie no matter how it turns out.  LOL, gotta hand it to lucas.  His work ethic for writing and directing may be non-existent,  but he is the ultimate go-getter at making excuses, and proactivley spinning.  :(

click here if lack of OOT got you down

Author
Time

walking_carpet said:

xhonzi said:

Having just sat through something* that is argualby (mostly) the Phantom Menace... and this being the first time in 6 years I've watched any of TPM...  Well...

Most of you know I'm an ardent PT hater.  Many of you may also know that I bear no fondness for TPM, Watto, Quigonn, film grain, or any of the other "redeeming" qualities that many see in this movie.  I consider TPM to be the objective worst of PT.

 But I just watched (mostly) it again.  And all I can say is that it is far more terrible than I recall and I can't understand how anyone could see anything redeeming in this movie.

 

it is interesting to hear people say that TPM is the best or 'most star wars like' and cite the film grain as one of the reasons.  I guess its kinda like how some people don't like Diamonds are Forever because it has such a plain look to it compared to the 60s Bond movies.

The difference is that AOTC and ROTS weren't shot on film but rather video, and THAT is why it's nice to see some grain.  There is no grain in the other two, making them look more like video games.

Unless I'm mistaken, they were still using film in 1971.

Author
Time

cue Skyjedi Lowry/Bond release rant in 3... 2... 1...

Anyway I find film grain to look pleasing but I would hardly ever call it a plus as part of a movie.  It's something that either is there or isn't, unlike a style of cinematography or plot which can change mid-movie.  Doesn't make/break it for me, although as I said I would prefer it.  I don't think I'd be able to articulate my view in much more detail without being easily contradicted, though, so excuse me for not elaborating.

A Goon in a Gaggle of 'em

Author
Time

greenpenguino said:

Kurt said:

toho-scope said:

http://youtu.be/eBKfFycVjeI
news report an hour before the premier of TPM, interviews with GL,rick mcallum and cast, and some interesting views from thosenot going to the film
enjoy

 

 I want to punch 1999 Jake Lloyd in the face ...

just look at 2:41 & his "I´m a movie star" attitude

 

Am I a bad person ?

 

 

Nope. I want to beat the living shit out of him too.

Too late - he's a cool, cynical chap now :D

Author
Time
 (Edited)

xhonzi said:

TV's Frink said:

Qui-gon, Obi-wan, Watto, Shmi, Duel of the Fates (music and lightsaber action), real film including grain, the battle droids (when they aren't talking), the score, Ric Olie...there's a lot I like about TPM. 

I understand but I DON'T UNDERSTAND!

Watto is an entertaining (even though over-the-top) cartoon character - he's like that sleazy villain in one of those schlock movies reviewed by the NC, where he says at the end "this one was actually pretty fun to watch".

I'd be inclined to compare him to the Green Goblin from Spiderman 1 - somewhat similar looks, OTT raspy voice and overall pretty silly. NC says he's fun to watch, I agree, and Watto seems the same to me.


Not sure what you have against the score or lightsaber duel, but the two Jedis are mostly rather boring - they have their short moments of entertainment value and personality, though.


Maybe my objectively rational evaluation will serve as a bridge to reconcile your extremist illusions :DD

Author
Time

TV's Frink said:

walking_carpet said:

it is interesting to hear people say that TPM is the best or 'most star wars like' and cite the film grain as one of the reasons.  I guess its kinda like how some people don't like Diamonds are Forever because it has such a plain look to it compared to the 60s Bond movies.

The difference is that AOTC and ROTS weren't shot on film but rather video, and THAT is why it's nice to see some grain.  There is no grain in the other two, making them look more like video games.

Unless I'm mistaken, they were still using film in 1971.

 right i understand.  DaF was on film, but it looks much different than Dr. No or FRWL. i was just making a comparison that how a movie looks can affect how we feel about watching it and its happened with other movies before.  It makes sense.

It really wasn't until i got my HDTV i started to understand this.  You know how TVs have that weird setting that adds frames to make it smooth?  no matter how good everything else is,  this setting throws it off.  

a really crazy example from my point of view is when CFL light bulbs first came out several years ago.  didn't matter if they were efficient, I could not stand them because I felt like I was living in a hospital :(  no comfort.

anyway, from what Im hearing, grain was removed from TPM blu ray and added to AOTC and ROTS.  So if all 3 were on a level playing field, I would think TPM is hurt the most.

click here if lack of OOT got you down