ray_afraid said:

twooffour said:

However, I'd vehemently disagree with the part where you say the scene is inserted "for nothing more than a CGI mess".
You certainly haven't read my post.

So, because we disagree, that means I didn't read you post? Right.

Not really, it's just if you reply to a post of mine where I, at great length, describe all the "cool stuff" in that particular scene, line specific lines, or mannerisms (or the fact that this Jabba is much better than the original nervous guy in the funny hat, and makes some of the lines here more ironic than they'd been originally), as a direct pre-emptive rebuttal to the "this is just for more stupid CGI" attitude - I'd reasonably expect you to actually somewhat address my sentiment, and why, despite all the bullshit I'd said, you still think this scene has nothing more to offer than "stupid CGI mess".

Just saying "it was a stupid CGI mess" in one lazy sentence, is something you would do if you... hadn't read my post.

I mean, what kind of dialog is that?
"Lucash just included the scene to show off silly fake CG"
"Well let me refer you to my post above, where I have 10 examples arguing that it's more than that"
"... it's just stupid CG".

Whatever floats your boat, man.