logo Sign In

What do you LIKE about the Prequels? — Page 2

Author
Time

Monolithium said:

The meaningless stupidity that is Attack of the Clones.

That's what you liked?

Author
Time

TV's Frink said:

Monolithium said:

The meaningless stupidity that is Attack of the Ridiculous.

OF COURSE!!

Fixed

<span style=“font-weight: bold;”>The Most Handsomest Guy on OT.com</span>

Author
Time

doubleofive said:

Watto, yes, best part of the prequels!

Not that I'm biased.

The actor who played him (too lazy to look it up) did a good job. I really liked the short scene in AOTC when he meets Anakin after 10 years; sometimes it seems that there was more emotion in the dialogue from Watto in that one scene than in the rest of the PT combined.

“It is only through interaction, through decision and choice, through confrontation, physical or mental, that the Force can grow within you.”
-Kreia, Jedi Master and Sith Lord

Author
Time

^I agree...except for the wacky "BOING" when he drops the tool on his foot. :-/

Author
Time

TV's Frink said:

^I agree...except for the wacky "BOING" when he drops the tool on his foot. :-/

1990s/21st Century Lucas always ruins his own good ideas.

“It is only through interaction, through decision and choice, through confrontation, physical or mental, that the Force can grow within you.”
-Kreia, Jedi Master and Sith Lord

Author
Time

TV's Frink said:

Monolithium said:

The meaningless stupidity that is Attack of the Clones.

That's what you liked?

Yup.

I HATE TPM.  I STRONGLY DISLIKE ROTS.  I ENJOY AOTC.

Since they're like poetry, what with the rhyming and all, I find that I only need to watch three out of the six films.

Author
Time

AOTC is the best of the prequels.

i wont cry for you
i wont crucify the things you do
i wont cry for you, see
when you're gone ill still be Bloody Mary

Author
Time

Paparazzo said:

AOTC is the best of the prequels.

Can't tell if you're joking or just stupid...

Author
Time

Paparazzo said:

AOTC is the best of the prequels.

I used to think that, when I was seven. :p

Anyway, here's what I liked about the prequels:

1. The John Williams score was on-par with the OT.

2. A lot of the planets, spaceships, battles, etc. had potential, but the CG work ruined it.

3. Ric Olie

4. Some of the actual costumes and animatronics were great.

5. I liked the Bantha in TPM when they are in Mos Espa.

 

That's about all I have to say about that.

 

 

Author
Time
 (Edited)

I must once again recount the small amount of things I like from the PT ... sigh.

1. Liam Neeson

2. Ewan McGregor

3. John Williams' score

4. Amidala's chrome starship

5. Watto

6. Darth Maul

7. Darth Maul's lightsaber

8. The whole "Jedi as interstellar Pharisees" thing

9. Dex (What can I say? I like his personality and even his design. It would have been better if he had been brought to life through practical effects, though)

10. The Kaminoans

11. Mace Windu's lightsaber

12. General Grevious' visual design

13. Anakin retaining his blue lightsaber in his duel with Obi-Wan

And that's all I can think of.



Author
Time

There was a third thread named like this, where I wrote down a lot of points. Can't find it anywhere though... oh well.
Nice thread :)

Agree with most of that - the prequels sucked as overall movies, but it's nice to point out little aspects,, elements and moments in it that were decent to pretty damn amazing.

Author
Time
Darth Maul and John Williams score for TPM. TPM was an ok film accept for the midichlorian crap and Jar Jar Binks. The other two films were just dreadful...Clones was by far the worst SW film ever made, in fact when we were walking out of the film people were actually booing....
Author
Time

Paparazzo said:

AOTC is the best of the prequels.

Nah. JJ Abram’s Star Trek is the best Star Wars prequel

<span style=“font-weight: bold;”>The Most Handsomest Guy on OT.com</span>

Author
Time

You know, I suspect that if these movies came out in sequential order rather than OT, then PT, people would see them as inferior but still decent films.  The passion on this board amuses me.  I certainly don't like the PT nearly as much, but I can still watch and enjoy them.  In my mind, I can incorporate them into my personal Star Wars canon or disregard them, depending on my mood.

To keep with the point of the thread, I would like to comment on one particular aspect which I know has been criticized, but seems logical to me, especially in light of the EU and reality.  As we know, power corrupts.  Any power like the force would be so tempting as to be truly corrupting.  In the Star Wars universe, I suspect that when the force was first discovered, most wielders found themselves utilizing it for evil.  As Yoda said, the dark side is quicker, easier, more seductive.  But it is not more powerful.  As those who learned to use the force become more aware of its capabilities, they also realized that great discipline must accompany its mastery, else the user would fall to the dark side.

So now we get to the PT.  The Jedi are an extremely rigid and disciplined group.  They are indeed powerful force users, but only because they are willing to take years to master the good rather than days to master the evil.  But at the same time, their rigidity contributed to Anakin's fall, their inability to detect Palpatine's growing influence, and it ultimately led to their downfall.

To sum up, I know most do not like the portrayal of the Jedi Order, but to me, it is actually a logical system for security that simultaneously leads to their demise.  I like this idea.  The dark side is not stronger, but the light is so difficult to master.

Author
Time
 (Edited)

darth_ender said:

You know, I suspect that if these movies came out in sequential order rather than OT, then PT, people would see them as inferior but still decent films.

I can sum up the opposing viewpoint in one image...

http://mimg.ugo.com/200908/10678/jar-jar-binks.jpg

The hate for the PT goes beyond when it was released, and rightfully so.

Author
Time

Had they been released in order, there would have never been Episodes 2-6.

IT'S MY TRILOGY, AND I WANT IT NOW!

"[George Lucas] rebooted the franchise in 1997 without telling anyone." -skyjedi2005

"Yeah, well, George says a lot of things..." a young 1997 xhonzi on RASSM

"They're my movies." -George Lucas. 19 people won oscars for their work on Star Wars (1977) and George Lucas wasn't one of them.

Rewrite the Prequels!

 

Author
Time

darth_ender said:

You know, I suspect that if these movies came out in sequential order rather than OT, then PT, people would see them as inferior but still decent films.

Have you seen the Red Letter Media reviews?

ROTJ Storyboard Reconstruction Project

Author
Time

The internet is a great place for people with passion to state their viewpoints as absolute facts.  I don't mean to criticize.  I enjoy reading your posts, and you guys make me laugh.  But simply because this website exists does not mean that the PT would not have been popular of its own accord.  There are four Pirates of the Carribean movies, and the first was the only enjoyable film in my mind.  Star Trek has come out with 11 movies, some of them horrendously bad.  How many horror films have produced innumerable stupid sequels, yet still garner a loyal fan-base?  Just watched the new X-men movie, and that is a franchise that has really gone downhill in my mind, but I doubt they're done.

Likewise, there are websites devoted to bashing the new Batman franchise, which I greatly enjoy.  It's hard for most Internet surfers to believe, but there are other opinions out there.  And to top it off, those with differing opinions are actually allowed to feel that way.  Divergent opinions are still valid.

I hope not to make enemies at a site entitled originialtrilogy.com.  I am disappointed with the PT as well.  But I can still enjoy them and feel no guilt for doing so; I will sleep fine tonight, even with the knowledge that others here think I'm a heretic and/or moron.  I enjoy all your points of view, and will happily post something when I ifeel like it, wishing no ill will on those who think that unaltered OT is the Word of God that shall not be tampered with.  I come to this site because I truly love the originals, but also because I love all the variations, official and official.

Why are there all those laser dots shining on my head and chest?

Author
Time
 (Edited)

darth_ender said:

There are four Pirates of the Carribean movies, and the first was the only enjoyable film in my mind.  Star Trek has come out with 11 movies, some of them horrendously bad.  How many horror films have produced innumerable stupid sequels, yet still garner a loyal fan-base?  Just watched the new X-men movie, and that is a franchise that has really gone downhill in my mind, but I doubt they're done.

To my point, had the 3rd PotC been first, there would have never been sequels.  Had Star Trek The Motion Picture been first, (you know what I mean) there would have never been sequels.

Had there not been something good to begin with, there wouldn't have been sequels.

The PT would not have fared well without the goodwill engendered by the OT.

There are a lot of opinions out there- but, in my opinion- having an opinion doesn't necessarily mean it's a valid one.

IT'S MY TRILOGY, AND I WANT IT NOW!

"[George Lucas] rebooted the franchise in 1997 without telling anyone." -skyjedi2005

"Yeah, well, George says a lot of things..." a young 1997 xhonzi on RASSM

"They're my movies." -George Lucas. 19 people won oscars for their work on Star Wars (1977) and George Lucas wasn't one of them.

Rewrite the Prequels!

 

Author
Time

twooffour said:

There was a third thread named like this, where I wrote down a lot of points. Can't find it anywhere though... oh well.
Nice thread :)

 http://originaltrilogy.com/forum/topic.cfm/No-but-seriously-What-we-like-about-the-Prequels/topic/11950/

It's currently on the front page of this forum.  And it was linked on post 6 of this thread as well.

IT'S MY TRILOGY, AND I WANT IT NOW!

"[George Lucas] rebooted the franchise in 1997 without telling anyone." -skyjedi2005

"Yeah, well, George says a lot of things..." a young 1997 xhonzi on RASSM

"They're my movies." -George Lucas. 19 people won oscars for their work on Star Wars (1977) and George Lucas wasn't one of them.

Rewrite the Prequels!

 

Author
Time

TV's Frink said:

darth_ender said:

You know, I suspect that if these movies came out in sequential order rather than OT, then PT, people would see them as inferior but still decent films.

I can sum up the opposing viewpoint in one image...

http://mimg.ugo.com/200908/10678/jar-jar-binks.jpg

The hate for the PT goes beyond when it was released, and rightfully so.

Good lord! I forgot how fake he looks.

<span style=“font-weight: bold;”>The Most Handsomest Guy on OT.com</span>

Author
Time

darth_ender said:


You know, I suspect that if these movies came out in sequential order rather than OT, then PT, people would see them as inferior but still decent films.
As filmed, TPM has no introduction to any of the Star Wars staples. People who hadn't seen the others could infer from what they heard if they saw TPM first. The current TPM could not have been the first movie.

Star Wars Revisited Wordpress

Star Wars Visual Comparisons WordPress

Author
Time

timdiggerm said:

darth_ender said:

You know, I suspect that if these movies came out in sequential order rather than OT, then PT, people would see them as inferior but still decent films.

Have you seen the Red Letter Media reviews?

 No, I haven't, but I'll take a look when I can.  I did read the Wikipedia article on it.  I'm sure it is insightful, and I look forward to when I can.  Believe me, I have problems with the PT, but if we look with perspective, we'll see many of the same problems with other films we are more accepting towards.  The biggest variable is that other popular films don't have the OT to build up greater expectations.

You know, I expected more comments regarding the Jedi Order which comprised the bulk of my message, not the first couple of sentences.  Oh well :)