I've seen dvd's mastered at 29.97 fps (interlaced) that were from a film > pal then field-blend to 23.976fps! The jaggies (in the gout) are there because the fields were scanned individually (i'm just about certain)... (this was perfectly normal in 1993), but the DVNR is totally inexcusable. The very few flaws in the film scan that it covered up was no where near the inexhaustiveproblems that it created... probably Lucas thought it looked better like that?
Post #497580
- Author
- RU.08
- Parent topic
- Yet another preservation, Star Wars Trilogy: Throwback Edition (* unfinshed project *)
- Link to post in topic
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/497580/action/topic#497580
- Date created
- 9-May-2011, 1:02 PM