logo Sign In

Random Thoughts — Page 131

Author
Time
 (Edited)

||random quote from twitter||

DarwynsTheory tweeted:

http://twitter.com/#!/DarwynsTheory/status/57872887197077505

Just took a picture of Mjj taking a pic of @davedays taking a pic of me. #inception? http://plixi.com/p/91849427


greenpenguino said:


One thing that irks me is when people say the terminology

'I could care less'

 

The correct terminology is

'I couldn't care less'

 

'I could care less' just makes no sense. If you could care less about something, then all you're telling us is that you do care, at least a little bit. Because you COULD care less. But if you couldn't care less means you don't care at all and if you wanted to care any less about it you couldn't because it's out of your 'caring spectrum.' You are so low on the caring bar-chart, as it were that you could not care less. If your caring is at 0%, then you couldn't care less.

 

Thank you for your time.


QFT!!!!


http://img687.imageshack.us/img687/7405/cooly.gif

http://twister111.tumblr.com
Previous Signature preservation link

Author
Time

There's too much David Bowie on these threads.  And too much Chuck.

Author
Time

Sluggo said:

There's too much David Bowie on these threads.  And too much Chuck.

QFT!

Author
Time
 (Edited)

TV's Frink said:

Sluggo said:

There's too much David Bowie on these threads.  And too much Chuck.

QFT!

 

 

 

 

[Comment deleted]

<span style=“font-weight: bold;”>The Most Handsomest Guy on OT.com</span>

Author
Time

greenpenguino said:


One thing that irks me is when people say the terminology

'I could care less'

 

The correct terminology is

'I couldn't care less'

 

'I could care less' just makes no sense. If you could care less about something, then all you're telling us is that you do care, at least a little bit. Because you COULD care less. But if you couldn't care less means you don't care at all and if you wanted to care any less about it you couldn't because it's out of your 'caring spectrum.' You are so low on the caring bar-chart, as it were that you could not care less. If your caring is at 0%, then you couldn't care less.

 

Thank you for your time.

 http://originaltrilogy.com/forum/topic.cfm/Words-Mean-Things/post/400585/#TopicPost400585

Might be of interest to you.

IT'S MY TRILOGY, AND I WANT IT NOW!

"[George Lucas] rebooted the franchise in 1997 without telling anyone." -skyjedi2005

"Yeah, well, George says a lot of things..." a young 1997 xhonzi on RASSM

"They're my movies." -George Lucas. 19 people won oscars for their work on Star Wars (1977) and George Lucas wasn't one of them.

Rewrite the Prequels!

 

Author
Time

random thought:

Thanks to the internet, no one ever has to be alone again.

Even those who should be.


Author
Time
Taylor Swift has the voice of an angel, and the writing of a twelve-year-old who doesn't understand how the world really works. Anyone agree?
Author
Time
 (Edited)

DuracellEnergizer said:

 

Taylor Swift has the face of an angel

agreed


Author
Time

RedFive said:

DuracellEnergizer said:

 

Taylor Swift has a face

agreed

yes

<span style=“font-weight: bold;”>The Most Handsomest Guy on OT.com</span>

Author
Time
 (Edited)

greenpenguino said:

One thing that irks me is when people say the terminology

'I could care less'

 

The correct terminology is

'I couldn't care less'

 

'I could care less' just makes no sense. If you could care less about something, then all you're telling us is that you do care, at least a little bit. Because you COULD care less. But if you couldn't care less means you don't care at all and if you wanted to care any less about it you couldn't because it's out of your 'caring spectrum.' You are so low on the caring bar-chart, as it were that you could not care less. If your caring is at 0%, then you couldn't care less.

 

Thank you for your time.

ibleedspeed said:

ok i will explain this whole punctuation thing. i am very uneducated. i hated school and dropped out as a freshman in highschool.  does this make me dumb? not really. in fact i could probably teach you guys a thing or 2. yes yes i have bad spelling and punctuation. i admit it because frankly i do not give a flying shit about any of that stuff. if you wanna take cheap shots at me about it because its amusing then have at it. i am not offended by it because you are right. i know dick about commas and capitalization. english was my worst class and i never payed attention. however my scholastic achievements have never held me back. and i find it amusing that you guys seem to hold proper english typing in such an important light. as long as i am understood i could not give  a care less what anyone thinks about my typing. is that enough explaination?

+1 for ibleedspeed


Author
Time
 (Edited)

I have a pretty dumb friend Amanda (she gets called "Aman-duhhh" a lot behind her back, that's how dumb she is), who yesterday said,"I don't think I want to pay for LinkedIn anymore. It's not worth it." I said, "What are you talking about?"

Amanda: Huh?

Me: Linkedin is free.

Amanda: (lengthy pause with really vacant expression) Huh?

Me: I mean, you can pay for LinkedIn, but only for poweruser features you don't need. Otherwise it's free.

Amanda: Nooooo...?

Me: Yeeeahhhh...?

Amanda: I don't believe you.

Me: (gets out phone and pulls up linkedin) See on the join page where it says at the top in big letters, "To join LinkedIn, sign up below ... it's free"?

Amanda: (another lengthy pause while she processes this information, well "process" may be a strong word, let's go with "absorbs") Well, how much does Facebook cost?

Me: HA! Facebook is free.

Amanda: Nooooo it isn't.

Me: AmanDUH! Yes it is! All of these social networking sites are free.

Amanda: Why?

Me: What do you mean "why?" Why are they free?

Amanda: Yeah. Why don't they charge you? How do they make money?

Me: Ads. Selling your personal information to third-parties.

Amanda: (chewing on a lettuce wrap for too long) Really?

Me: Yeah, really.

Amanda: Maybe I should sign up for Facebook.

Me: (quietly to myself) I question why we're friends daily.

 

 

Author
Time

Wow, LinkedIn is hardly a good "social" network, as its for business users. And paying for it... Wow.

Wow.





Wow.

Star Wars Revisited Wordpress

Star Wars Visual Comparisons WordPress

Author
Time
 (Edited)

Well, to be fair, she was using it for business. She's a yoga instructor. But you only pay for it if you're like a serious networker or professional recruiter who needs access to people outside your network, or wants to work directly with LinkedIn customer support. It's for power-users. Not Amanda. She's been paying for it for almost a year....

Author
Time

doubleofive said:

Wow.

Man, sounds like she's a total biscuit.

Author
Time

TV's Frink said:

doubleofive said:

Wow.

Man, sounds like she's a total biscuit.

Nah.  I doubt she plays World of Warcraft.

There is no lingerie in space…

C3PX said: Gaffer is like that hot girl in high school that you think you have a chance with even though she is way out of your league because she is sweet and not a stuck up bitch who pretends you don’t exist… then one day you spot her making out with some skinny twerp, only on second glance you realize it is the goth girl who always sits in the back of class; at that moment it dawns on you why she is never seen hanging off the arm of any of the jocks… and you realize, damn, she really is unobtainable after all. Not that that is going to stop you from dreaming… Only in this case, Gaffer is actually a guy.

Author
Time

Gaffer Tape said:

TV's Frink said:

doubleofive said:

Wow.

Man, sounds like she's a total biscuit.

Nah.  I doubt she plays World of Warcraft.

http://media.skateboard.com.au/forum/images/Thats_the_joke.jpg

Author
Time

Dear USD, I am NOT okay with you removing your entire music library before I go there. OR your kid's book section. :< SO UNCOOL! I know an education is more important than what music is in the library (now? NONE.), but the record collection was a big draw when I took the tour last year. Empty study room in the section's place, which was once covered in records.

A Goon in a Gaggle of 'em

Author
Time

bkev said:


Dear USD, I am NOT okay with you removing your entire music library before I go there. OR your kid's book section. :< SO UNCOOL! I know an education is more important than what music is in the library (now? NONE.), but the record collection was a big draw when I took the tour last year. Empty study room in the section's place, which was once covered in records.
Like LPs?

Star Wars Revisited Wordpress

Star Wars Visual Comparisons WordPress

Author
Time

Dave Nelson said:

Joe, engines full stop; prepare to reverse on my command.

Joe Garelli said:

Who's this?

Dave Nelson said:

It's Dave!

Joe Garelli said:

Dave's not here, man.

Dave Nelson said:

No, this is Dave--the captain, Dave--now engines, full stop!

Every 27th customer will get a ball-peen hammer, free!

Author
Time
 (Edited)

Yes, like LPs. They're in the process of selling their children's books too, which is actually a bigger problem as a library - regardless of where - always deserves that kind of section.. I'm actually going to send a complaint to the admissions office, even if I don't go there apparently they listen to prospective students quite a bit. Some of the faculty I spoke to were also very distraught by these decisions; and just between you and me, the students don't even use the library to study because it's just too loud. So those new study rooms are useless.

A Goon in a Gaggle of 'em