Alexrd said:

adywan said:

It was meant in jest, but you only originally mentioned it as a defence from people attacking prequel apologists, so it did seem that this was your purpose or else why even mention it?.

No. I mentioned because you were "attacked" by fanatics due to your edit/vision/opinion/whatever, and that made me remember the article's reported attack.

Extremes exist everywhere, be it PT or OT fans.

I misunderstood your intentions. i apologise

dark_jedi said:

adywan said:

WhatsMyName said:

Plus, the whole Luke Leia, Bro, Sis deal. That was planned when GL first wrote Star Wars. Does anybody there watch documentries?

But it wasn't. George said himself in one of the original documentaries that he didn't know who was going to end up with Leia: Luke or Han. leia was never the sister. Luke was to have a sister who was to be introduced in a later episode of the saga but, because GL decided to end it all at 6, he couldn't introduce her. he also need a reason why Luke would get so mad at vader and the sister angle was to be his breaking point. So Leia, who was the only main female character in the saga, became the sister.

Which one specifically? I would like to hear this myself, as I am sure others would to, and know for sure, instead of taking everyone's word for it.

It was in the making of star wars. he says "who she's going to end up with is still anyone's guess. what i will say is that Luke is more devoted to her than Han.."

Edit: found a video of it on youtube @ approx 2:20

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G87jhIeTk0w&feature=related

Plus there is a deleted scene from ESB where Luke and Leia move in for a kiss in the medical bay. If she was indeed intended to be his sister all along then George is one twisted guy ;)