I got hippies, Hopis, and hypos.

I'm trying to capture the gestalt of HIPPO by staying at the edges of the word. I mean, aren't all things defined both by what they are, but also by what they are not. Without said seperation there is no distance between you and I, salads and hippos, The Rock and hard places. A hippo is as much formed by all the things that are NOT hippos as it is by its own inherent hipposity. If God Is what He Is, doesn't it follow that he, and hippos are well, are not what they are not? I might be on probation, but it logically leads to the truth that I could NOt be on probation, and the nature of probation itself is only possible if it is conceivable to both be and not be on a level where we seek to transcend the infinite, face the possible, trivialize the opposite, and ultimately both come to grips and release simultaneously the aspect of the very thing we're trying to define.

I mean, right?

Oh yeah, and