Hm, yea, sounds about in accordance with my impression when reading some of his posts.

Some very well spoken, interesting opinions. Some really stupid stuff inbetween, as well.

I guess what I found pretty annoying to read were the parts where, after the conversation had descended into the bickering territory, he started doing the "communication history analysis" (you know, the "I posted that, and then you said that, and then I responded without insulting, then you insulted me, and now I remember you insulting me and have included a few jabs towards you, but that's only because, and I only intended to... etc." kind), all in that obnoxiously inoffensive and pedantic tone - can't say it was somehow wrong, but it was annoying to read ;)

Maybe despite, or because I like doing something like that myself at times ;)