logo Sign In

Post #479765

Author
twooffour
Parent topic
PT vs OT Scientific Study
Link to post in topic
https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/479765/action/topic#479765
Date created
2-Mar-2011, 5:43 PM

greenpenguino said:

twooffour said:

TV's Frink said:

twooffour said:

So why the incredulity in your voice? Do you somehow thing this opinion of mine is outrageous and dumb?

The idea that Grievous is a better character than Vader is probably the most ridiculous thing I've ever heard on this site.  It's an opinion that isn't wrong (no such thing) but it's an opinion that is insane.

However, you said "better," not "better character," so I now wait for you to educated me on your definition of "better."

You do realize that "insane" is basically like a super-duperlative of "wrong", right?

mm hmm, yeah.

And judging by the beginning of the thread I'd say that because Vader had a bigger impact on 'TheBoost' students than Grievous, Vader is the Better...thingy. And BTW how do you know Frink had incredulity in his voice? You do realise you're reading text on a screen?? Not a voice?

Vader being more known among students doesn't lead to ANY such conclusions.

If you seriously apply the,.. appeal to popularity to anything concerning art or entertainment, you clearly need to grow up a lot.

 

Take a look at Angus MacFadyen's performance in the piece of shit "Warriors of Virtue" - that guy trumps Grievous in the "campy over-the-top villain" territory by like 10 times, Grievous'a  complete bore compared to him, so how come "Komodo from Warriors of Virtue" probably isn't anywhere as well known as Grievous?