logo Sign In

Post #479671

Author
twooffour
Parent topic
PT vs OT Scientific Study
Link to post in topic
https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/479671/action/topic#479671
Date created
2-Mar-2011, 1:52 PM

TV's Frink said:

Sometimes I can't tell if 2/4 doesn't understand what :D and ;) mean or if he's just as convinced of his own opinions as I think he is.

Quit with the lame clichés, T. We all know damn well that if I or anyone else were to come out and flat out say "the characters in the PT were awesome", or "Natalie Portman was so interesting the whole time, and in the climactic scenes in ROTS she showed such emotion", or anything as "sacrilegious" as that, you and the majority of this board would start ROFLing and thinking, if not saying, "no what an idiot, he has no idea what makes a good movie, or what good acting looks like."

What's the point of whining and crying about how "convinced someone is of his opinion" if you don't even bother with a counter-argument? I mean, for fuck's sake, at least I've posted a couple paragraphs with examples from Qui-Gon's performance... you know... put it up or leave it.. wait no, how was that again? °_°

 

As for the smilies, the "smirks" and "teasing tongue"s and "cordial laughters" are as ambiguous and multifaceted on the intertubes as they are in real life.

Can't understand how someone can say something nasty and dismissive while punctuating it with a :D, the "cheerful" smiley? Think of that black dude from Equilibrium. NUF SED!!!