The Aluminum Falcon said:
ChainsawAsh said:
It was a timecoded copy, simply meant so all the members could tell each other exactly what they were working on down to each frame. It was just a reference, it wasn't the actual video they were working with. I believe it was made from the video they were working with, but it was much lower quality since it was just meant to be a timecode copy.
Ahh... gotcha. How much lower is it? Despite its lower quality, would it still have been better than most laserdisc preservations or the GOUT?
Probably not. Besides, every frame has timecode burned into it, so unless you like watching digital workprint, I don't see how the timecode copy is useful in any way.