TV's Frink said:

twooffour said:

Okay, I'm bowing out as far as sock stuff goes, but Ghostbusters - as somewhat of a fellow internet addict, here's an advice: you should consider seeking out counselling if things are this serious.

I mean, you're asking other people to quit responding to you, because you just can't, can't quit on your own, but you have to because your studies require attention?

I know where I'm heading when it gets this bad (so far, I deem myself sufficiently in control),

twooffour said:

TV's Frink said:

It's curious that Ghostskeet hasn't been banned already. That should seal it. ;-)

twooffour, your letting your own experience with sock accusations affect your assessment of the situation. I'm willing to accept there's a reasonable chance you are not a sock. But Ghostbusters is Janskeet. There's no question about it.

Um, didn't I just say I'd "bow out" as far as "this sock business goes", because I didn't know enough?

Nope, you said you were bowing out, not why or what you believe.

"Bowing out" of any sort of discussion is usually what one does when confronted with lots of information about a topic that proves one wrong and one can't be bothered to immerse in and check out.

So first I'm saying "these sock paranoids are crazy lol", then lots of evidence and proof shows up as a reaction, and next thing I'm saying is "ok, ok, bowing out here"... hmmm, what could it mean?

Yea, just in case it still ain't clear, I see you've got your good amount of arguments in this case, but I'm not interested enough to look it up and study the history of all the suspected users, so I'm... bowing out.