doubleofive said:

I'm still not 100% sure what you want me to say, so I put this:

The elements were recomposited due to the wipe to this scene, also changing the timing making this shot longer.

(1997 Change)*
Feel free to write me out a caption if that's still not it, or direct me to how to correct the image.

Ah, sorrry. Hadn't noticed you had updated the accompanying notes. As it is three differences to the original film in that shot, wipe, recomposite, timing/lenght you could always split it up in three screen-caps instead of two, like it is now you don't have a clear image of the original composite of the scene in there due to the different lenght of the scene, just a thought.

Also, are we sure that shot was recomped necessarily due to creating the new wipe, have they not created a new wipe over original elements before in other shots? Maybe you're on to something, maybe we could check all the other wipes to effect sequences and see if they also were recomped, for example in comparison 15, 57 and 88. Are those original composites? Maybe hard to tell.

doubleofive said:

Tried to tweak the description again for the Sunsset. Again, please feel free to write up new captions.

To me it definitely looks like the wide-shot was recomposited in '97, so a screen-cap of the '97 incarnation of the scene is much needed there IMO. In the close up of the suns however, it is impossible to tell if anything was done, that one was just me speculating aloud.

Keep up the good job, 005! :)