logo Sign In

Post #464351

Author
twooffour
Parent topic
RedLetterMedia's Revenge of Nadine [TPM 108 pg Resp. [RotS Review+RotS Preview+ST'09 Reveiw+Next Review Teaser+2002 Interview+AotC OutTakes+Noooooo! Doc.+SW Examiner Rebuttal+AotC Review+TPM Review]
Link to post in topic
https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/464351/action/topic#464351
Date created
15-Jan-2011, 11:31 PM

I haven't even read most of the thing yet, but in his introduction, he has this to say about the AOTC review's "disgusting disingenuous tactics":

Such as asking whether Sidious was a former Jedi gone bad, despite his frequent meetings with the Jedi as Palpatine without anyone ever treating him as such.

... NOT, a good way to start, pal. NOT good, at all.

All he does is show Sidious among others while complaining about the lack of exposition in regards to the Sith - are all of them ex Jedi, or not? What's happening?

Palpatine might've been trained as a Jedi without the knowledge of the official council, if that were the case. PLINKETT NEVER IMPLIED THAT SIDIOUS MIGHT BE A FORMER JEDI COUNCIL MEMBER. /confusedmatthewvoice

 

Wow. Just wow. I'm looking forward to the rest of the rebuttal!