
- Time
- Post link

Quote
Originally posted by: ShimraaQuote
I know the US isn't guiltless but we have been on the right side of every war we've been involved in. We nevered conquered another country.
OMG I am sorry man but that is such and arrogant statement, America has been on the right side of every war. Lets name the last three wars America has been part of. The second golf war they went to war on lies. On faulty intelligence, the ends DOES NOT justify the means. Saddam had no weapons he said so many times he let arms inspectors in. (yes he was secretive but that is his right. he does not have to lie down for America) and we find out now that he didn’t have any. Afghanistan. This was a very good move, bush attacked the root of the problem after 911 I agreed with this war and I commended bush for it. Rather then attacking everything is sight after 911 bush thought it through then attacked. Then we go back to 1990 to the first golf war. Just curious do you know how that war was started. Ill tell you. Kuwait was drilling at an angle and taping oil on Iraq’s side of the boarder. In effect they were stealing Iraq’s oil. saddam found out, told them to stop, they wouldn’t and so saddam invaded. America thinking they were the best then went in and attacked Iraq, in effect America defeated the thieves. Now tell me was America on the "right" side in 2 of those last three wars. NO lets look at some of the other wars they were a part of. In Vietnam they tried to impose their capitalistic views on a country that was going to become communist is that right or wrong to impose your views on others. Then in Afghanistan they fueled supplies to the Arabs so that Afghanistan would not be taken over by the USSR. Then in WWII the Americans only entered the war only after they had been attacked even thou Britain and France and Canada was asking for their help b4 hand and even thought Hitler was committing the holocaust where was there urge to be the law enforcement of the world then. then lets go way back to the 19th century. America annexed New Mexico, Texas, and California from Mexico. They took over that land. (so don’t tell me the US has never taken over other countries directly. heaven knows how many countries they have taken over indirectly.) Back then they also annexed Washington stat, which was originally going to be part of Canada when Canada gained independence. And your telling me they aren’t gutless. America isn’t your right but they are nowhere near innocent either. Don’t get me wrong wither I like America I will probably live there one day and be a citizen. But I really do despise there foreign polices and really wish they would just sit in there own country and not worry about what is going on in the middle east the only reason 911 happened was because they would not stop influencing the middle east whether they were financing a rebel group or a government or actual there trying to oust leaders they didn’t likeQuote
fighting is part of mans nature
Personally I feel that man is good. Go to any individual and ask them some basic questions about war and justice and they will all reply in the same way but when you get groups of people now that is where things get bugged up.
That is all for now cus I just saw this topic. Topic and I don’t want confer too much at one time other wise people start missing the points that are being brought up.
Quote
Originally posted by: RRS-1980Quote
Originally posted by: Darth Chaltab
have y'all forgotten how it felt to see Three thousand innocent people blow away? Have you no sympathy for them?!
The symptoms of American amnesia are showing again... you seem to forget about the compassion displayed worldwide after the 9/11 massacre. It took a whole war to dimnish it.
None of us here ever presented even a hint of sympathy to Hussain, bin Laden or terror groups. Like I said before, they should be all neutralized long time ago. American intervention in Afghanistan to overthow the Taliban regime supporting terrorists was understandable - I don't see anybody arguing about that.
But we do wonder about the sudden change of priorities. TV suddenly stopped to talk about bin Laden and switched to Hussain, as if the first was no longer a problem. This, and other (alleged?) aspects (the profits of US gaining control of the oil fields in Middle East, personal vendetta of Bush family etc.) make us question the legitimacy of US intervention. We do not say that Saddam is OK. Do not mistake us with those freaks who wanted to be his live shields.
To be honest I was sort of frustrated by the sudden shift of focus myself. I didn't really become suspicious or anything. I just thought in his zeal to remove Hussein made Bush lose focus on bin Laden. And that is one of Bush's mistakes I mentioned earlier. And I am glad to know that you aren't completely insane. I guess the media likes to mention only the most absurd anti-war people.Quote
Originally posted by: Darth Chaltab
At the time bin Laden hadn't slaughtered 3000 innocent people and there was no way we could've know what would happen in 2001.
No way to guess? If you give a granade to a maniac you think he will be grateful and is not going to throw it into your house?
They weren't given weapons without a cause... they were meant to be a dangerous group, but their target supposed to be USSR, and not USA... but things got out of control and the "good" terrorist transformed into bad terrorists...
If you fight by the sword, you die by the sword.
True but at the time the Soviet Union was slaughtering anyone who spoke out against them and they intented to take that into Afghanistan. I think we did what we did for the right reason even if it cost us later. But if we had better intelligence before 9-11 we might have been able to prevent it. I'm not going to start bashing Clinton or anything. Just making a statement.Quote
Originally posted by: Darth Chaltab
And why do you say the war on Terror is "propaganda?"
Because formerly USA was the state sponsoring the terror groups and Arab regimes and now you're playing saint.
Have you heard about Crusades? The ones aimed to liberate the Holy Land from Muslims? Everything in the name of Christianity and God? Do you know where the last Crusade ended? (I'm not talking about Indiana Jones here) It destroyed Constantinople, the heart of Byzantum, the Eastern Christian church! Why? Because it was business! They were the competition and Western Roman Empire wanted none.
That is why I'm sceptical when people shout that some war is waged in the name of God, Nation, Freedom etc. Wars are usually about economical influences of a given state(s) and their immediate profits.
Of course. I know all about the Cruisades. I went to a private Christian school until two years ago and they made sure our generation doesn't repeat any of the mistakes of the past because of ignorance. And I think that the Crusaides are probably apart of why Muslims hate Christians so much. And I understand your skepticism but.. I think that the president should have to earn distrust. I mean it seams to me that most of you are against the war in Iraq because you don't trust Bush rather than distrusting Bush because we went to Iraq.
But my view is that history has shown that if you try and appease evil dictators then your wasting your time. Evil must be confronted and destroyed. Before WWII Churchill insisted that something be done about Hitler, but the nations of Europe then said "we are for peace" and then in 1939 Hitler invaded Poland. Same with Hussein. Appeasment doesn't work. We tried to avoid war for years but he violated nearly 20 UN resolutions (which of course, mean nothing to the UN) I think Bush Jr. understands that (he did go to Harvard, right?) and is now doing something.
One more thing before I get off of this soap box. The point has been raised that terrorism can't be defeated. Personally I think the "War on Terrorism" is a mis-nomer. I agree that terrorism is too... something.. to be eradicated by military force. The president clearly stated that the objective is to go after organized terror cells like Al quaed and governments that support them. Obviously we can't kill every Timothy McVeigh out there.
*Falls off soap-box and face-plants*
Quote
OK. Look Shimraa. In your worldview, your logic is spot-on. But that is appearanlty because you see the world through a moral relativist's perspective. We don't force democracy on others. Oppression is forced on others. Communism was forced on others. The Soviet Union started in a coup, not a people choosing communism.
Ok. maybe my statements were a bit.. er.. brash. I still believe we were on the right side of Vietnam and Korea. The problem is we weren't allowed to win at Vietnam. The government held the military back because of all the hippys chanting "give peace a chance." Now look at the countries into which we didn't stop the spread of Communism. Look at china. Look at North Korea. We were on the right side of Vietnam and Korea even though we ran away.
I'm not even going into the rebellious nature of humanity because that is a matter of theology and something that will cause people to go ballistic.
And please SEPARATE YOUR THOUGHTS NEXTIME. Do you know how hard it is to reply to something so hard to read?
Quote
Originally posted by: Darth Chaltab
And I didn't know that Chinese money was equal to US money. I wonder how that happened. Anyway.
"I'VE GROWN TIRED OF ASKING, SO THIS WILL BE THE LAST TIME..."
The Mangler Bros. Psycho Dayv Armchaireviews Notes on Suicide
Princess Leia: I happen to like nice men.
Han Solo: I'm a nice man.