I, for one, come down on the side of innocent until proven guilty. I think Gaffer is right and the pitchforks need to be laid down.

At issue is the fact that Dayv has misrepresented some things in the past and has edited related posts. Whether the deception was intentional or not--and whether the edited posts are an attempt to clarify or cover up--is impossible to say, but once you get caught rewriting history, your integrity will always come into question.

As I said in my previous post, each of you must make your own determination. This isn't a court of law and Dayv isn't on trial.