logo Sign In

Complete Comparison of Special Edition Visual Changes — Page 14

Author
Time

Wow, everything is tinted a brown-red in that 2004 shot. Look at it!

Author
Time

Watching a split-screen video makes you really realize how fu*ing BAD the 2004 DVD is

Author
Time
 (Edited)

doubleofive said:

avoidz said:


All these changes and tweaks and color differences boggles the mind.

They did indeed tear these movies apart and put them back together.

Johnny said:

YOU ARE TEARING ME APART, LUCAS!!!

Author
Time

Here's some possible changes from RotJ:

Captures are full res from the WG HD Splits, so not embedded since it would take a while to load.  Times are approximate from again the WG timecode not the movie.

The first shot of 3po and R2, seems like sky replacement.  The next shot in the sequence is significantly bluer in the 83 version.

http://img535.imageshack.us/img535/7591/swchangesrotj000000.jpg

 

09:21 - you all mentioned the Emperor Hologram in ESB, Luke in RotJ might have a similar issue.  The horizontal bars look like they are there in the shirt but the face ones have been obliterated.  09:32, Luke's belt. 09:59

http://img831.imageshack.us/img831/7420/swchangesrotj000921.jpg

http://img193.imageshack.us/img193/9687/swchangesrotj000932.jpg

http://img809.imageshack.us/img809/9965/swchangesrotj000959.jpg

 

10:28 - The pan from Jabba to Han carbonite has been maniuplated:

http://img225.imageshack.us/img225/3553/swchangesrotj001028.jpg

http://img401.imageshack.us/img401/791/swchangesrotj001028a.jpg

http://img705.imageshack.us/img705/996/swchangesrotj001028b.jpg

 

45:24 - does it look like Yoda begins to fade a few frames later?  or is it just the colors throwing me off.

 

Author
Time

Isn't the pan from Jabba to Han just an issue of missing frames in the GOUT? It sure looks like the splitscreen isn't perfectly lined up in that one, check the leaf the Jawa is holding.

We want you to be aware that we have no plans—now or in the future—to restore the earlier versions. 

Sincerely, Lynne Hale publicity@lucasfilm.com

Author
Time

msycamore wrote:

Isn't the pan from Jabba to Han just an issue of missing frames in the GOUT? It sure looks like the splitscreen isn't perfectly lined up in that one, check the leaf the Jawa is holding.

That make sense.  Watching it a few times now it looks like when the subtitles kick in, there's repeat frames.  Checked the GermanHD and it's doesn't happen there.

Author
Time

Got screenshots of all of the saber flashes in the Vader/Obiwan fight. Checked Luke/Vader in ESB, looks like the same thing. I'm going to grab a frame from each shot of the Leia hologram, then move on to ESB's flashes.

Star Wars Revisited Wordpress

Star Wars Visual Comparisons WordPress

Author
Time
 (Edited)

Presents! Although Picasa won't let me caption them, the saber flashes are up (including some that seem to appear BEHIND the sabers), Obi-wan's saber in the cantina, and Luke watching Leia's hologram is in there too. I need to do Obi-wan watching Leia's hologram, then I think I'm done with ANH until you all find something else.

EDIT: ALL of the saber recomps are 2004 not 1997, right? Or was Luke's training redone in 1997, with the saber battle being done in 2004?

Star Wars Revisited Wordpress

Star Wars Visual Comparisons WordPress

Author
Time

I have no idea if they were all in 1997 or not. Someone with the 97 SE will have to confirm that by going through them all.

Author
Time

The Luke training scene on the Falcon was all done for the '97 SE, the saber in Ben's hut was also recomped for the '97 SE, they are identical in appearence to the 2004 DVD.

Obi-Wan's saber in the battle with Vader was redone in 2004, the battle was still all untouched in the '97 SE including those flashes.

Just let me know if you want me to post any examples.

We want you to be aware that we have no plans—now or in the future—to restore the earlier versions. 

Sincerely, Lynne Hale publicity@lucasfilm.com

Author
Time

Thats so weird to me. It's 2004. You work for ILM, making George's ultimate edition of Star Wars, tying it even closer to the prequels you just worked on. You have the Vader/Obiwan battle with no effects, as it was originally filmed.

And you composite the original elements back on. That HAD to be harder than actually redoing the lightsabers using the digital files they had JUST used for the prequels!

Star Wars Revisited Wordpress

Star Wars Visual Comparisons WordPress

Author
Time
 (Edited)

Yeah, but what I think is really weird is those saber flashes in the duel, almost all of them in the DVD transfer looks like they have been eaten up by Lowry's dirt removal or something... I don't know, it looks really weird, just a green soft and dull core left, even if you correct the contrast levels you're still left without an outer glow, if even that. These 2004 transfers never ceases to amaze me, complete total disaster!

We want you to be aware that we have no plans—now or in the future—to restore the earlier versions. 

Sincerely, Lynne Hale publicity@lucasfilm.com

Author
Time

Just chiming in to say hello (longtime lurker here),and that the amount of time and effort you all have put into the comparisons? Brilliant and I thank you. Until I began reading this thread,I wasn't aware that the trilogy had been altered on such a massive scale.

 

Author
Time

Interesting stuff on the ESB sabers so far, especially the flashes.

I've grabbed the frames from the slo-mo cave fight, and it looks like the flashes are COMPLETELY redone, not even the same shape in some cases. msycamore, can you grab me a frame of a saber flash from 97SE of that scene to see if its 97 or 04?

Star Wars Revisited Wordpress

Star Wars Visual Comparisons WordPress

Author
Time

Which 97SE source is being used for the comparisons?

Author
Time
 (Edited)

Got the slo-mo frames up in ESB. Check it out:

http://lh4.ggpht.com/_1WBvrwBY-EI/TSSp9b8yfLI/AAAAAAAAHlI/H3VO4b0nyFg/s288/ESBadd-004.jpghttp://lh6.ggpht.com/_1WBvrwBY-EI/TSSp-6-upXI/AAAAAAAAHlQ/eNZGZKFzLb0/s288/ESBadd-006.jpg

All new saber flashes. The original elements seems to have a hair or something on them, I wonder if they were damaged so bad they couldn't use them for the SE.

Star Wars Revisited Wordpress

Star Wars Visual Comparisons WordPress

Author
Time

doubleofive, someone else have to help you out with Empire '97 SE, I don't own that one, the only '97 SE version I have is ANH.

none, the ANH '97 SE screen-caps I have provided are from the broadcasts, Reivax and Flunk.

We want you to be aware that we have no plans—now or in the future—to restore the earlier versions. 

Sincerely, Lynne Hale publicity@lucasfilm.com

Author
Time
 (Edited)

Looks like I need to get to my flaky hard drive and pull up ESB97 myself. That's fine, I just don't know when I'll have the time to play with it.

Or pittrek can get it, maybe?

Star Wars Revisited Wordpress

Star Wars Visual Comparisons WordPress

Author
Time

I'm really looking foward to TESB 97SE comparisons. It will be interesting to see if Vader has a pink lightsaber when he points at Luke while he is next to the Carbon Freezing Chamber pit - that part in the 2004 SE looked horrible.

Also, another thing that would be interesting to compare, is whether the blue tint on planet hoth is similar when comparing 97 SE and 2004 SE.

Can't wait!

Author
Time
 (Edited)

rockin said:


I'm really looking foward to TESB 97SE comparisons.

It will be interesting to see if Vader has a pink lightsaber when he points at Luke while he is next to the Carbon Freezing Chamber pit - that part in the 2004 SE looked horrible.

Also, another thing that would be interesting to compare, is whether the blue tint on planet hoth is similar when comparing 97 SE and 2004 SE.

Can't wait!
It's not that kind of comparison. I'm trying to limit it to deliberate changes, not transfer mistakes other than random examples. I'm thinking they didn't recomposite the sabers in every shot, which is why Vader's saber is pink in 2004 as they just went back to the 1997 film and messed with the colors. So far, that looks to be what happened.

There are some shots where the lightsabers have been redone, you can tell because they actually have a core. The slomo fight has cores and has been redone. The tauntaun slicing has no core and apparently has not been redone.

Star Wars Revisited Wordpress

Star Wars Visual Comparisons WordPress

Author
Time

We have 4 different instances of lightsabers in ESB:

Luke vs Wampa
Han vs Taun Taun
Luke vs Fake Vader
Luke vs Vader, in 4 or 5 sections

Luke vs Wampa looks exactly the same except for the lack of a saber flash when he cuts himself down. Han vs Taun Taun looks worse, but I don't think its an actual change. Luke vs Fake Vader is almost totally different looking. The parts of Luke vs Vader I've checked I can't tell, the colors are off, but the colors are off all over ESB in general.

Star Wars Revisited Wordpress

Star Wars Visual Comparisons WordPress

Author
Time
 (Edited)

Source: Flunk 97SE ESB XviD

 

 

 

 

 

Where's luke lightsaber go... ^

Author
Time

doubleofive said:

 

rockin said:


I'm really looking foward to TESB 97SE comparisons.

It will be interesting to see if Vader has a pink lightsaber when he points at Luke while he is next to the Carbon Freezing Chamber pit - that part in the 2004 SE looked horrible.

Also, another thing that would be interesting to compare, is whether the blue tint on planet hoth is similar when comparing 97 SE and 2004 SE.

Can't wait!
It's not that kind of comparison. I'm trying to limit it to deliberate changes, not transfer mistakes other than random examples. I'm thinking they didn't recomposite the sabers in every shot, which is why Vader's saber is pink in 2004 as they just went back to the 1997 film and messed with the colors. So far, that looks to be what happened.

There are some shots where the lightsabers have been redone, you can tell because they actually have a core. The slomo fight has cores and has been redone. The tauntaun slicing has no core and apparently has not been redone.

 

Apologies.

I actually should know this, as I have been following! Just got carried away and forgot the topic of comparison.