logo Sign In

Koyaanisqatsi - IRE Fullscreen Version (MORE IMAGE!) (Released) — Page 7

Author
Time
 (Edited)
S45 said:

I've been serching Koyaanisqatsi font for a long time. I'm making movie opening similar to Koyaanisqatsi and can't finish it without this font. Rapidshare link don't work anymore, please send it to me.


Welcome to the forum,

I've got the font saved on my computer, send me a PM with your e-mail address and I'll send it to you.
Author
Time
Max_Rebo said:

S45 said:

I've been serching Koyaanisqatsi font for a long time. I'm making movie opening similar to Koyaanisqatsi and can't finish it without this font. Rapidshare link don't work anymore, please send it to me.


Welcome to the forum,

I've got the font saved on my computer, send me a PM with your e-mail address and I'll send it to you.


Done.:)
Author
Time

It seems that Anima Mundi's Dvd suffers from the same issues as Koyaanisqatsi.

Does anyone have a 4/3 rip ?

There was a laserdisc released which seems to be uncropped.

Author
Time

Many movies intended to be shown in 1.85:1 were shot "open-matte."

Basically, there are two ways to shoot in 1.85:1 with 35mm film:

1. "Closed-Matte" - You mask off the top and bottom in the camera, so there are essentially black bars on the film negative itself

2. "Open-Matte" - You mask off the top and bottom on the monitor, but not in the camera, meaning there are no black bars on the negative itself, but the top and bottom were never meant to be seen

The second method is far more common.  All three Back to the Future films were done this way, as were several Stanley Kubrick films.  When it comes time to release a fullscreen VHS, they don't have to go through an expensive pan-and-scan transfer, they just transfer the full frame of the film.

The problem with this is that the shots are composed for 1.85:1, not 1.33:1.  Because of this, oftentimes you'll have boom poles dipping into the shot which would not be seen in the widescreen version, or other mistakes (a good example is The Shining - in the fullscreen version, you can see the shadow of the filming helicopter in the opening sequence, whereas it is unseen in the widescreen version).

As such, even if a film was shot "open matte," 9 times out of 10 it was always intended to be viewed in widescreen, and the only reason it was shot 1.33:1 was because it was easier and possibly cheaper.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open_matte

Author
Time

Most of Anima Mundi is made with stock footage, coming probably from Tv documentaries. Thus, the orignal format of these shots is 4/3, being composed with in mind the tv sets of those times.

The fullframe version was released, I'd just like to have a look at it. Having read this thread full of love for Mr Reggio's work, it wouldn't be surprising a laserdisc rip made its way to the internet.

Author
Time

 I currently have a never used DVD of the IRE Koyaanisqatsi. It has the red and black  DVDcover as posted  here and the Geoffrey Reggio signature slip inside.

The DVD itself is black and red with concentric circles with "KOYAANISQATSI"  on it.

 

What is something like this worth?

Author
Time

Currently helping to seed if anyone needs this right now.

This signature uses Markdown syntax, which makes it easy to add formatting like italics, bold, and lists:

Author
Time

Asaki said:

Currently helping to seed if anyone needs this right now.

 

Thanks Asaki. I know these are hard to come by, but even rarer that this particular disc has never been played.

Author
Time
 (Edited)

AvP said:

MSAGRO7 said:

^^^  I have that copy. Horrible version compared to the IRE one.

 

 I doubt it, ive just made it.

Someone correct me if I'm wrong, but I believe the "^^^" means go up three posts, not one.  MSAGR07 was talking about the disc, not the art.

EDIT: Just read through it again, and I have no idea what was meant.

Author
Time

AvP said:

MSAGRO7 said:

^^^  I have that copy. Horrible version compared to the IRE one.

 

 I doubt it, ive just made it.

 

Author
Time

MSAGRO7 said:

AvP said:

MSAGRO7 said:

^^^  I have that copy. Horrible version compared to the IRE one.

 

 I doubt it, ive just made it.

 

 Now I'm confused.  I was comparing the MGM release vs the IRE version.

If you burn a copy, are you burning from the MGM version or the IRE version?

What I have is an original IRE release disc with Roggio signature, and I was wondering what the value was.

Author
Time

dark_jedi said:

MSAGRO7 said:

I have decided to put this on eBay.

 

Here's the link:

http://cgi.ebay.com/KOYAANISQATSI-IRE-EDITION-BRAND-NEW-NEVER-USED-/300511937128?pt=US_DVD_HD_DVD_Blu_ray&hash=item45f7e84268

LOL, $300? good luck with that one, hope it sells for you, that is why people torrent, way cheaper.

 Yeah, but torrent is just a burned copy. This is an original IRE release.

I have 6 torrent discs of this version.

 

I put the eBay ad in yesterday, and I already have 4 'watchers' on it.

 

We will see...

Author
Time

Original, burned, what's the difference? it is the same thing, nothing different on the DVD itself(content wise), but like I said, good luck to you on your possible sale.

Author
Time

The only comparison I can give on this is a Beatle album "Yesterday and Today".

I can get copies of this album for relatively cheap. But the original cover of the 'butcher cover' sells for over $10,000.

The content of both albums sound exactly the same, but the hard to find original is what collectors are after.

Thats why I'm selling the IRE edition for this price.

Author
Time
 (Edited)

Hey I am not trying to argue with you, but things are only worth what people will pay for them, just to "me" that is crazy high price, but this is coming from a guy that just paid $250 for a God Of War III Kratos statue from SideShow Collectibles, I am glad I got a copy of this(the DVD your selling) when I did, although I still see it is well seeded, and still readily available.

OH, and your Beatles comparison, I wouldn't give $1 for that crap, but again, that is just me, never was a Beatles fan.

Author
Time

LOL understood jedi.  Not much of a Beatle fan also.

Originally a few people paid $180 for this  Koy disc to fund the Trilogy.

There is not many out there.

I was one of them. When I found out  MGM was releasing the DVD in 2001, I pre-sold my IRE copy on eBay for $300 (thats how I currently got my starting price).

When I bought the MGM version, I was totally mad on how inferior this copy was, and spent 3 years looking for another IRE version.

I ended up getting the one I now have on eBay at an estate sale in 2004.

Will let this site know how the sale goes.  If it doesn't sell, I will just keep it.

Author
Time

You seem to be confused about the purpose of this site - folks here are more interested in preserving and sharing rare materials than profiting from them, but good luck whatever.

On a more pertinent point, has anyone heard any rumblings regarding HD releases of the Qatsis? They seem an obvious choice for a BD release, assuming (a) there's a big enough market and (b) the studio can keep that market happy with an appropriate choice of aspect ratios...

Author
Time

Good point Jonno, I came on this site by google and had a question on worth.

I too would love to see an HD version of Koy.

I did not mean to come off as a profiteer.

Author
Time

To throw my 6 cents in on the "true" aspect ratio topic: My impression was that they filmed it assuming it would be displayed in both ratios, so they shot it so that it would look good in either. There may be more information in the full screen print, but the widescreen also looks quite good, and I honestly don't think you miss a huge amount. That being said, I'm glad people have preserved the fullscreen print for posterity.