vaderios said:

So are you suggesting to lighten up the previous shots when you are clearly see that the trench is dark as hell? I kept the details i kept the lights with every visual impact available. I still think my version is more organic from the original flat one. Not to mention it looks less like a prop ;)

-Angel

No, I am not suggesting that, I am suggesting keep it dark in the other shots and keep it light here. There could be heaps of explanations for the difference if you really need one.

1. There may be a new light source. The local star perhaps, or a reflection from Bespin or one of its moons.

2. Most of the other shots could have been in deep space so they looked darker.

3. A simpler explanation is that this is a chase shot. We are following the falcon. It has gone into a dark area so the director made the shot lighter to suggest that the participants eyes had adjusted to the dark and their pupils had dilated.

As for the 'prop', I think the model is awesome. When the image is viewed as it should be (moving, not frozen) it looks incredible. I think the lighting in ESB is one of the films strengths. It enhances the mood of the whole film. I think changes to the lighting should be minor (IMHO).