logo Sign In

Complete Comparison of Special Edition Visual Changes — Page 8

Author
Time
 (Edited)

doubleofive said:

And I thought my brain hurt before. This is becoming less "Special Edition changes" and more "where did they find that copy of ESB in 1993?"

BTW, can anyone break down what they think I should add to the listing RE holograms. Which shots, which versions I should stack up, etc.

 I would list all known versions, but not try to answer whether they added for the theatrical or video, because we really don't know. Just use the examples on video. But include the SE as well, because it's noteable that the pattern in order of release on video is: 1)complete (1986/1992) 2) incomplete (1993/1995) 3) complete again (1997/2004). It's not that they necessarily removed it in 1993 and then re-instated it in 1997 or 2004, but this is the order of (home video) public appearance from the information currently available. So I would use all three screens of the video releases. And the 8mm version to represent the 70mm.

Author
Time

Alright, so I'll have:

8mm/70mm which was posted a couple pages back
Jwhatever that was posted a few more pages back
1993/GOUT
1997 SE
and maybe 2004 for grins

Star Wars Revisited Wordpress

Star Wars Visual Comparisons WordPress

Author
Time

If you're going to add the 70mm visual differences you also have another one posted in this thread,  http://originaltrilogy.com/forum/topic.cfm/70-mm-print-of-the-Empire-Strikes-Back-Differences/topic/2321/

Puggos 8mm-preservation with its few visual differences is the only source we have of the numerous visual differences that appear throughout this cut.

maybe this help ;)

70mm Cut - from 8mm source - no fading in, no scanlines

'93 DC LD/'95 Faces LD/GOUT - fading in, no scanlines

'86 Japanese Special Collection LD/'92 US Pan&Scan LD and '97 SE - fading in, with scanlines 

We want you to be aware that we have no plans—now or in the future—to restore the earlier versions. 

Sincerely, Lynne Hale publicity@lucasfilm.com

Author
Time

What is this shadow supposed to come from?

We want you to be aware that we have no plans—now or in the future—to restore the earlier versions. 

Sincerely, Lynne Hale publicity@lucasfilm.com

Author
Time

Just pray that they don't alter it further.

Author
Time
 (Edited)

Yeah, Empire had that full-fledged, wide re-release in '81 (and 82), I guess it's possible a few things got snuck in for that. (like Star Wars' crawl in '81) Although it was my understanding that any positive for theaters was totally useless for home video until pretty recently.

Author
Time

msycamore said:


If you're going to add the 70mm visual differences you also have another one posted in this thread,  <a href="http://originaltrilogy.com/forum/topic.cfm/70-mm-print-of-the-Empire-Strikes-Back-Differences/topic/2321/</a>" title="originaltrilogy.com/forum/topic.cfm/70-mm-print-of-the-Empire-Strikes-Back-Differences/topic/2321/">http://originaltrilogy.com/forum/topic.cfm/70-mm-print-of-the-Empire-Strikes-Back-Differences/topic/2321/</a>" target="_blank">http://originaltrilogy.com/forum/topic.cfm/70-mm-print-of-the-Empire-Strikes-Back-Differences/topic/2321/">http://originaltrilogy.com/forum/topic.cfm/70-mm-print-of-the-Empire-Strikes-Back-Differences/topic/2321/</a>

Puggos 8mm-preservation with its few visual differences is the only source we have of the numerous visual differences that appear throughout this cut.

maybe this help ;)

70mm Cut - from 8mm source - no fading in, no scanlines

'93 DC LD/'95 Faces LD/GOUT - fading in, no scanlines

'86 Japanese Special Collection LD/'92 US Pan&Scan LD and '97 SE - fading in, with scanlines 
http://www.starwars.com/databank/character/nutegunray/img/eu_bg.jpg
"This is getting out of hand!"

Star Wars Revisited Wordpress

Star Wars Visual Comparisons WordPress

Author
Time
 (Edited)

But seriously, I've added the holograms we've posted on here, all versions and tried my best to explain what they are.

http://lh4.ggpht.com/_1WBvrwBY-EI/TNHwWbuRCPI/AAAAAAAAG-U/Vzzml-oMZdA/s800/emp1-all.jpg

Way too many versions. But the best part is it goes "no scanlines, scanlines, no scanlines, scanlines, new image" If anyone can figure out what happened, I'll be impressed.

Star Wars Revisited Wordpress

Star Wars Visual Comparisons WordPress

Author
Time
 (Edited)

I added the credits to ESB. All two of the official changes. My favorite is this:

http://lh5.ggpht.com/_1WBvrwBY-EI/TNH4wp91c2I/AAAAAAAAG_E/YB2nOpHYV8o/s400/esbcredits01.jpg

"The size of Executive Producer title was reduced to match the other titles."

Actually, ALL of the titles were huge in the original and reduced in the SE recreation. In fact, EVERYTHING IS DIFFERENT. Spacing, sizes, placement, timing... I'm going going to post the official ones because they were important enough for whoever this guy is to point out (the more I do this, the more I think this guy was given a split-screen version and told to find as many changes as he could).

Star Wars Revisited Wordpress

Star Wars Visual Comparisons WordPress

Author
Time
 (Edited)

You don't need to have 5 pics of the Emperor, as the '97 SE is identical how it appear in the JSC/Pan&Scan LD's, I don't know if it's really necessary to have even four of them as you cannot really see the differences in them, (not at that size, anyway) it should be enough with just two holograms, one with scanlines and one without plus the '04 version making it three images in total ;) and just a description for the variations of the remaining one.

I would remove the top two images of the Emperor and just make a description of the 70mm version or show the unfading, using the pics in the thread I linked to, just a thought.

We want you to be aware that we have no plans—now or in the future—to restore the earlier versions. 

Sincerely, Lynne Hale publicity@lucasfilm.com

Author
Time

The real picture is MUCH bigger. And I think Zombie could use it more for his purposes with all of the above. I have the original comps in there for simple comparison, then I have a super-advanced one. ;-)

Star Wars Revisited Wordpress

Star Wars Visual Comparisons WordPress

Author
Time
 (Edited)

Alright. ;)

Edit: it sounded rude. ;)

We want you to be aware that we have no plans—now or in the future—to restore the earlier versions. 

Sincerely, Lynne Hale publicity@lucasfilm.com

Author
Time

Without reading back the whole thread, are the pre-86 video releases represented?
msycamore did show a pan/scan shield generator shot . . . from what source?

IIRC some of dark_jedi's p/s preservations were posted on usenet in the recent past, but those were the time-compressed LDs. I know nothing about time compression, but I'd guess they'd be missing some frames or fields (or have some blended together) which might or might not be a problem if you're looking for specific frames.
I think I'll repost dark_jedi's "Standard Play" preservations. Those are the uncompressed pan/scan CAV LD sets 1130-84 & 1425-84 (the same ones believed to contain theatrical soundtracks, since they predate the digital sound era.)

However, in practice you must take into account the “fuckwit factor”. Just talk to Darth Mallwalker…
-Moth3r

Author
Time

I'm going to stick with SE changes myself, but if someone can grab shots from whatever other versions are out there for comparison, I'll gladly add them to my own.

Star Wars Revisited Wordpress

Star Wars Visual Comparisons WordPress

Author
Time

Darth Mallwalker said:

Without reading back the whole thread, are the pre-86 video releases represented?
msycamore did show a pan/scan shield generator shot . . . from what source?

No, any examples from earlier video releases are very welcomed. :) 

Yes, the shield generator shot was from dark_jedi's time-compressed pan&scan LD from '92 and I had to be a little careful when I checked it so I didn't confuse blended frames with scanlines. ;) 

We want you to be aware that we have no plans—now or in the future—to restore the earlier versions. 

Sincerely, Lynne Hale publicity@lucasfilm.com

Author
Time

The top image is from the 1992 US Pan&Scan Laserdisc, showing little to no scan lines on Vader's hologram, while the 1993 version has fat scan lines and the 2004 version has smaller scan lines.

 

Your description of this one is wrong, the top image is a 8mm-cap (the source is probably the 70mm cut) showing the "unfinished" hologram and it seems to match the '04 DVD holo pretty close. All other versions (probably final version) have the scanlines as seen in the middle pic. It's all a little messy cause the Special Editions also have a mix of "final" and "unfinished" versions of the holograms and screens like the GOUT of EMPIRE. Either it was never set in stone how they should look or they didn't bother to composite the scanlines or they simply forgot it, like they did with several other composites.

We want you to be aware that we have no plans—now or in the future—to restore the earlier versions. 

Sincerely, Lynne Hale publicity@lucasfilm.com

Author
Time

I was thinking, if you are going to include pre-SE changes made to Empire, you will also have to include the 1981 opening to Star Wars. Let me know if you want specific screen caps of it.

We want you to be aware that we have no plans—now or in the future—to restore the earlier versions. 

Sincerely, Lynne Hale publicity@lucasfilm.com

Author
Time

Ok, I'll get them for you.

We want you to be aware that we have no plans—now or in the future—to restore the earlier versions. 

Sincerely, Lynne Hale publicity@lucasfilm.com

Author
Time

I'm loving the teamwork going on here!

Author
Time

Sluggo said:


I'm loving the teamwork going on here!
It takes a team to wrap our minds around all of the different versions. I just can't believe we're the first to notice the "there one version, gone the next" scanlines. Not having scan lines in one version I can kind of understand.

http://lh6.ggpht.com/_1WBvrwBY-EI/TNHwVyIly4I/AAAAAAAAG-Q/_-kK2ESUF74/s800/capitans-all.jpg

This I don't. The scanlines are going in the complete opposite direction!

Star Wars Revisited Wordpress

Star Wars Visual Comparisons WordPress

Author
Time
 (Edited)

doubleofive said:

This I don't. The scanlines are going in the complete opposite direction!

Yeah, it's a bit weird, they are also vertical for the '97/'04 Leia hologram in SW.

I've not had the time to get the '81 caps for you yet, I'll post them later tonight...

Thanks for uploading the Standard Play LD, Mallwalker. I'll take a look. :)

 

We want you to be aware that we have no plans—now or in the future—to restore the earlier versions. 

Sincerely, Lynne Hale publicity@lucasfilm.com

Author
Time

doubleofive, the '81 crawl is completely different in terms of timing to both the original and the SE, for example if I match it up by frames to your comparison pic 5, the '81 crawls' "Episode IV" haven't even entered the frame yet. So, how do you want me to capture them, by an exact match in frame counts or just by the appearance?

We want you to be aware that we have no plans—now or in the future—to restore the earlier versions. 

Sincerely, Lynne Hale publicity@lucasfilm.com