zombie84 said:
ChainsawAsh said:
Bingowings said:
it had a nice editorial comparing the 3Dising of classic 2D films to Ted Turner scribbling pastel shades over monochrome classics
That's good. That's pretty much exactly how I feel about it.
That's not the same. Ted Turner bought the films and changed them against the wishes of their owners. This is totally different--the owners are changing them on their own will.
Yeah, but I don't really care. It wasn't shot that way, so I refuse to see it that way. Even if a director chooses to colorize his own movie, as in your example, I'll never watch the colorized version, and I'll continue to wish it didn't exist, despite what the director says.
The same thing applies to 3D.