logo Sign In

3D STAR WARS for the masses...has ARRIVED! — Page 9

Author
Time

Anchorhead said: 

Look at the myriad of changing stories & excuses - lost, ruined, Grand Vision, money, technology, no demand, etc, etc - that he's given for not properly releasing the 1977 version of Star Wars. It doesn't matter how many people continually ask for it, or expose and prove him a liar.  He just doesn't want to, so he digs his heels in even more.

All kidding aside, he's not right mentally.

I heard somewhere once that later in life Monet destroyed as many of his old paintings as he could find because he was crazy or an ass or both.

ps

It might have been Manet. Art's not my thing.

Author
Time

TheBoost said:

I heard somewhere once that later in life Monet destroyed as many of his old paintings as he could find because he was crazy or an ass or both.

It was Monet.  Not really as many as he could find, but it was several series of works that he had decided weren't perfect.

Forum Moderator
Author
Time

Anchorhead said:

TheBoost said:

I heard somewhere once that later in life Monet destroyed as many of his old paintings as he could find because he was crazy or an ass or both.

It was Monet.  Not really as many as he could find, but it was several series of works that he had decided weren't perfect.

 I imagine he splashed them with turpentine, slashed the canvas, then turned to someone nearby and said, "That's my original vision!"

Author
Time

The action figures for the 3D release will be flat, but you can buy special glasses to see them in three dimensions.

Author
Time

Star Wars is already in 3D (two dimensions of space and one of time).

Author
Time

Wow, so we are getting a conversion in four dimensions for the price of three! A bargain!

Author
Time

I've got to admit, this all makes me sick. Not the 3D part of it as i would go and watch the OT in 3D if just for the fact that it's on the big screen. No, it's the fact that the OT in 3D won't happen unless the Prequels do well. Talk about kicking us OT fans in the balls again. So he's basically saying to us that we have to support the PT3D or we won't get the OT3D. So we can probably place a safe bet that the OT3D just ain't going to happen. There is no way i'm going to pay to see the PT on the big screen ever again. The only way i would sit through it would be purely for novelty value and only if it was either a cut price showing or free.

But wait a minute, didn't GL say that the reason that we can't have a restored OUT is because "it's too expensive"?. But it's ok to spend all the money to make these films 3D? How can it be too expensive to restore the OUT when he would easily recoup his money from the blu-ray / DVD sales. Pure and simple he wants the OUT buried

ANH:REVISITED
ESB:REVISITED

DONATIONS TOWARDS MATERIALS FOR THE REVISITED SAGA

Author
Time

On BBC Radio Four today (I can't remember which programme) it said that TPM and ROTJ were going to be released first???

I'll see if I can track down which programme it was (it had a nice editorial comparing the 3Dising of classic 2D films to Ted Turner scribbling pastel shades over monochrome classics).

The Mark Kermode/ Simon Mayo show took a similar stance.

It might be worth someone dropping them a line about the irony and about the campaign to restore the OUT.

Author
Time

Bingowings said:

Star Wars is already in 3D (two dimensions of space and one of time).

Palmpatine

 

Author
Time

Bingowings said:

it had a nice editorial comparing the 3Dising of classic 2D films to Ted Turner scribbling pastel shades over monochrome classics

That's good.  That's pretty much exactly how I feel about it.

Author
Time
 (Edited)

ChainsawAsh said:

Bingowings said:

it had a nice editorial comparing the 3Dising of classic 2D films to Ted Turner scribbling pastel shades over monochrome classics

That's good.  That's pretty much exactly how I feel about it.

It was Front Row (don't know how many of you can use the listen again option).

The Simon Mayo/Mark Kermode show is here but it's also available to listen to in podcast form via iTunes and the like

Author
Time

ChainsawAsh said:

Bingowings said:

it had a nice editorial comparing the 3Dising of classic 2D films to Ted Turner scribbling pastel shades over monochrome classics

That's good.  That's pretty much exactly how I feel about it.

It exactly the same issue. Instead of just being colorization the entire film is physically endangered.

VADER!? WHERE THE HELL IS MY MOCHA LATTE? -Palpy on a very bad day.
“George didn’t think there was any future in dead Han toys.”-Harrison Ford
YT channel:
https://www.youtube.com/c/DamnFoolIdealisticCrusader

Author
Time
 (Edited)

Wouldn't be funny if Lucas decide to hold off on the BluRay Saga Boxset next year, and decide to only release the movies on BluRay in 3-D in 2017 after the 6 movies are finished theatrically?

Lucas would say in 2017, "Sorry you fell in love with half-completed SW movies from 1977-2005, as these are the real versions now.  If you want the OOT, SE, PT in 2-D, they're availabe on VHS or DVD.  Sorry bitches!!!"

Author
Time

adywan said:

I've got to admit, this all makes me sick. Not the 3D part of it as i would go and watch the OT in 3D if just for the fact that it's on the big screen. No, it's the fact that the OT in 3D won't happen unless the Prequels do well. Talk about kicking us OT fans in the balls again. So he's basically saying to us that we have to support the PT3D or we won't get the OT3D. So we can probably place a safe bet that the OT3D just ain't going to happen. There is no way i'm going to pay to see the PT on the big screen ever again. The only way i would sit through it would be purely for novelty value and only if it was either a cut price showing or free.

But wait a minute, didn't GL say that the reason that we can't have a restored OUT is because "it's too expensive"?. But it's ok to spend all the money to make these films 3D? How can it be too expensive to restore the OUT when he would easily recoup his money from the blu-ray / DVD sales. Pure and simple he wants the OUT buried

There is no reason to think that you have to pay for the PT to see the OT. The conversion is already being made, and it was announced already that all six films will be converted.

As for the OUT, he may think it's too expensive considering how much profit will it make. It could not cover the price of restoration. That's what I think he means, I can be wrong.

Author
Time

I guarantee you that if he poured the money for the 3D conversion of all 6 films into restoring the OUT instead, and released it in a Blu-Ray box along with the 1997 SEs, 2004 SEs, and the 2011 SEs (assuming there will be more changes), he'd make all his money back and more.  I think that would be more profitable than 3D re-releases.

Mainly because I know I would buy that, but I'll not see any Star Wars film in 3D, ever, no matter what, and I can't be the only one.

Author
Time

ChainsawAsh said:

I guarantee you that if he poured the money for the 3D conversion of all 6 films into restoring the OUT instead, and released it in a Blu-Ray box along with the 1997 SEs, 2004 SEs, and the 2011 SEs (assuming there will be more changes), he'd make all his money back and more.

I'm not sure how can you give me any guarantee about that. I know you wouldn't be the only one to buy it. I would assume almost everyone on this forum would. Including me.

Author
Time

Well, obviously I can't give you a real guarantee, as no one can unless they happen to have a time machine.  But I'd be confident enough to bet everything I have on it.

Author
Time

Alexrd said:

As for the OUT, he may think it's too expensive considering how much profit will it make. It could not cover the price of restoration.

I guess he says that, but I'm sure he knows the math of it is pure bullshit.

Author
Time

My estimation for the cost of restoring the OOT from the original negatives:

$1-4 million.

Sales for the first day of release of the 2004 boxset:

$100 million

So, let's say the OOT deluxe boxset does about half of that, just to be conservative. And lets upsize the restoration cost of the trilogy to be about $5 million. Then lets add another two million in some disc design and extras, plus all those other miscellaneous cost. Fox pays for the marketing and distribution, as far as I know. But lets highball it again and say that Lucasfilm sinks another $10 million in its own marketing and tie-ins like website features and such.

So, highballing a restored, high-def release from the negatives with a 4K or 8K D.I.: $5 for the restoration +$2 million for DVD and Blu Ray production+$10 million for marketing and tie-ins.

That's a price of about $17 million, highballing everything. But hell, let's push it up some more, just to put us further in Lucasfilm's corner and say it's gonna cost $20 million.

So, assuming the release does half of the 2004 DVD set, and also factoring in the fact that this will be one of the most popular Blu Ray releases at least in its year, let's make a conservative estimate of $300 million in combined sales in its first year of release. It ought to make half a billion by its third year in circulation. Again, being super-duper conservative. Now, part of that goes to Fox--but Lucasfilm's deal with them is extremely lucrative for Lucasfilm. Let's say they give Fox 25% of the sales.

So, for an exaggerated price of $20 million, Lucasfilm stands to right away make just shy of $250 million in the first year of release, and about half a billion in less than five years.

Yeah, poor Lucasfilm. Personally, in a more realstic setting I would cut the cost in half and double the profit margins.

The roadblock to the OOT is psychological, really, not financial. On paper it is the last gold egg from the Star Wars goose. If you were paranoid you could say that they are saving it for when they have no more product, but I think Lucas' last hurrah is the 3D releases, as by the time they are done he will be in his mid-70s and will likely be preparring to break up his empire and retire fully.

 

Author
Time

What could be better than seeing your childhood raped in 3-D.  Just joking but that guy who saw the special edition in 1997 said "this is like watching your childhood being raped for 2 hours."

The guy was a trekkie and filmed Free Enterprise.  But did not give JJ Trek the same treatment, when the other trek nerds cried JJ raped our childhoods.

His defense he never liked Roddenberry trek and wrath of khan was his favorite film.

“Always loved Vader’s wordless self sacrifice. Another shitty, clueless, revision like Greedo and young Anakin’s ghost. What a fucking shame.” -Simon Pegg.