logo Sign In

Post #442401

Author
zombie84
Parent topic
Save Star Wars Dot Com
Link to post in topic
https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/442401/action/topic#442401
Date created
21-Sep-2010, 11:15 PM

Anchorhead: Thanks for the correction; page has been updated. And thanks for the praise. I have to say, the feeling is mutual: reading your posts and interacting with you the last few years has given me an invaluable insight into the films that I doubt I would have otherwise. You are a rare breed of fan that most people my age don't get access to, and it sort of saddens me to think of the loss that people will have when they don't have first-hand access to people that have been around since 1977 but didn't keep up with the Lucasfilm machine.

005: I decided to post news on the CNET article, so thanks for bringing that to everyones attention. I will also be updating the SE page soon with your newer screenshot efforts.

None: As far as I remember, Rinzler's recent SW book was frighteningly accurate about portraying the films as they were, instead of how Lucas today wishes they were. Not 100% of course, there are a few inaccuracies, but in any book that size there will be.