none said:

Had dinner with two of the panelists, both sides need to realize the difference between a concrete point, and emotional argument. No one can prove what the other side likes. By showing faults in their logic and statements you won't win the debate (since there's no conclusion) but you'll have the higher ground. Opss PT reference! Many Bothan's died to get you this information.

Amanaman Rulez+++++

Eitherway, most people involved in this debate agree that all the versions of these movies should be saved.

None,

The problem is that PT fans constantly psychoanalyze why we don't like the movies, and if you listen to their arguments, they are all bullshit, or excuses why they think the PT is good.

I have never tried to convince someone that the PT is bad, but I will argue with them if they say stupid shit like 'Lucas had it all planned out in 1976', or that 'Star Wars was called Episode IV in 1977 but Fox wouldn't let him put it in.' Those are just lies, and if listen to those panelists statements, alot of their comments are just plain lies and spin to justify why the PT is better received by the public.

Honestly, they are like political consultants who go on Meet the Press and they will say anything to defend their political party no matter what. Atleast the fans of the OT will readily admit that Jedi is not as great as SW & Empire if we feel that way, and we don't just lie so we can convince someone its as great as its predecessors.

I have never heard a PT defender ever say ANYTHING bad about the movies, never say anything bad about a SE change, and I disagree with you that many enjoy that Lucas won't put out the OOT on BluRay.

I'm sorry but these a-holes are a big reason that we are not seeing the OOT on Bluray, because they except ANYTHING Lucas does to the movies, and Lucas has enough of them as a fanbase to keep making money.