True. I like to host all my files on my own server though, just for protection's sake against third-party servers going down, deleting things, etc., being slow, etc. In this case it just seems unnecessary to have a HD upscale of the GOUT for the point of comparison when a standard-def cap for both would suffice. These pics are for the point of illustration, and need not be of reference quality since both A and B videos are available to all. Though at the same time, it would be kind of cool to do a definitive thing.

Maybe what we can do is host the full-res files offsite and I'll just keep the downconverts on my own space.

I think once we have the full catalogued version here, I'm going to go through and do a full running time measurement of the total changes, including re-comps, redone opticals and audio alterations. Might be useful. I alway thought one could plot that on a horizontal line graph against the running time, with indications of when a change occurs and whether it entered in 1997 or 2004. Would make the staggering amount of changes more tangible.