Yeah, FAQ could work. But I thought more like on the example of GOUT, have a short article that would go like:

Although the original versions of the films were relaesed on DVD in 2006 this cannot be thought of as a true preservation, because 1993 LaserDisc [with a hypertext to some site that explains what a LD is] masters were used as a source and therefore the DVDs suffer from following problems:

1) Non-anamorphic transfers.

[A bunch of pictures (maybe gifs to show it in motion) illustrating the problem]

[A link to a more in-depth analysis of the problem]

2) Execive amounts of grain:

[A bunch of comparison pictures (maybe gifs to show it in motion) illustrating the problem]

[A link to a more in-depth analysis of the problem]

3) DVNR smearing

[A bunch of comparison pictures (maybe gifs to show it in motion) illustrating the problem]

[A link to a more in depth analysis of the problem]

and so on...

It should be more graphic IMHO, like have moving gifs and maybe highlighting or zooming on the issue in question in the pictures. I'm even toying with an idea of doing a documentary that I'd put on youtube when I get my good computer back. I hope you wouldn't mind me citing some of your execelent articles in it.