PSYCHO_DAYV said:
Warbler said:
PSYCHO_DAYV said:
MORE FORUM VOTES ON YOUR "FORUM FUTURE?" YOU WANTED THE SAME THING DONE ON THE MANGLER BROS. FORUM, AND LOOK HOW THAT TURNED OUT. WARBLER, AND I MEAN NO HARM BY THIS, I REALLY THINK THAT YOU SHOULD GET TESTED FOR CLINICAL DEPRESSION.
1. I still wonder how that poll in your alternate universe would have turned out if it had been set up the way I wanted it set up, instead of the way it was done.
2. This poll was not to ask if people still wanted me to post on this forum, this poll about whether or not I should resume talking politics.
3. I am already taking an anti-depressant and am in therapy.
I SAT THE POLL UP THE WAY I DID TO KEEP FROM SINGLING YOU OUT ON THE FORUM. I MADE IT FAIR AND DEMOCRATIC IN ORDER TO KEEP ANYONE FROM COMPLAINING ABOUT THE RESULTS.
You set it up in a way that singled me out. It singled me out as the initiator of a poll that would have kicked someone off the forum. They didn't like such a poll and so they voted for the person that they blamed for the poll, me. I wanted a poll where the only one in danger of being kicked off was me. I believe those that chose not to vote in your poll, might have chosen to vote to keep me on the forum, if the poll had been set up the way I wanted it.
Dayv's poll:
who do you want kicked off the forum?
(listed each forum member)
(here a popularity contest in which, not surprisingly, I finished last )
Warbler's poll
should Warbler leave the forum or not?
(yes or no)
(here a simple question of whether or not forum members wanted me on the forum)
a big difference is it not?
In your poll, someone had to get kicked off the forum. In my poll it was possible no one would get kicked off the forum.
Its possible that if someone had to be kicked off the forum, they'd prefer it was me rather then someone else. But that is not the same as not wanting me on the forum.