![](avatars/431.jpg)
- Time
- Post link
Quote
Originally posted by: jimbo
Yes but all major Star Wars villians up to this point have been either human or humanoid. I like the idea of having a completly bizare looking creature as not just a dumb animal but a intellegent character. I think that Grevious will be great. Episode 3 will rock.
Quote
Originally posted by: Darth Chaltab
Actually, Grevious can only use three lightsabers because he has to reserve one limb to stand up.
Quote
Originally posted by: Rebel Scumb
Sure he didn't have a fight scene, but who cares, Han never had a fight scene doesn't make him less of a character. SW is quickly being reduced to an intergalactic WWF
Quote
Originally posted by: Han's Girlfriend
does he really have 4 lightsabers? sounds kinda lame imo. it's like in ep1 they thought: what would be cooler than a lightsaber fight? a fight with a double-sided lightsaber!! and how can we top that in ep3: a quadruple lightsaber!! ka-ching ka-ching!
actually, the darth maul fight was great but they should have left it with that.
Quote
Originally posted by: Han's Girlfriend
lol!
and also: don't you need the force to be able to effectively use a lightsaber? can a droid then use the force?
Quote
Originally posted by: starkiller
Summary: I do not see the Force as a prerequisite for using a lightsaber. But having the Force (or cybornetically enhanced speed and timing) would allow one to excel with it.
Quote
Curiosity question that may have already been answered at some point or another... is Grievous officially considered Sith or is he just another random baddie thrown in the PT mix?
Quote
Originally posted by: jimbo
Rebel Scumb that better not have been a fucking spoiler. I am going Spoiler free for Episode 3. It is rude and nasty to drop spoilers on people without warning. Next time you have a spoiler please drop a warning.
If Grevious had a jet pack he could float and hold all four lightsabers.
Quote
Originally posted by: Bossk
We've had that argument before on this site and I'm still not completely happy with the answer. It was in reference to Maul using a lightsaber when he is not a Jedi (former Jedi, etc.). I think the decision was that, because he was a Sith apprentice, he could still wield one. However, Grievous is a robot (android, whatever), so how do you justify that one. He's not a living being or anything like that. I dunno. I so 'fused.
Quote
Wielding a lightsaber is similar to wielding a sword. (The difference is in the balance of the weapon. The Lightsaber's blade has no weight to it).
Quote
Originally posted by: Rebel Scumb
But this logic seems to have been abandon in the PT.
Quote
Originally posted by: Bossk
We've had that argument before on this site and I'm still not completely happy with the answer. It was in reference to Maul using a lightsaber when he is not a Jedi (former Jedi, etc.). I think the decision was that, because he was a Sith apprentice, he could still wield one. However, Grievous is a robot (android, whatever), so how do you justify that one. He's not a living being or anything like that. I dunno. I so 'fused.
QuoteExqueeze me?? Darth Maul sucked ass. All the villains in Ep.1 and 2 were quite pathetic so far. That includes Maul who did not "work out" for me.
Originally posted by: Shimraa
(...) Did Darth Maul look like a starwars villain. At first, not really, he looked like freak from a marvel comic. Did he make a cool villian, yes, and did he work out yes.