logo Sign In

nothing much — Page 4

Author
Time
 (Edited)

Yes.  You were ignorant.  That's nothing to be ashamed of.  But it shouldn't be up to ignorant people to decide these things.  For example, I am ignorant when it comes to cars.  Therefore, someone shouldn't come ask me if their car is broken or not because I wouldn't be an authority.  But if you don't know what a word means, a simple trip to the dictionary would be all that's required to clear anything up.  And if somebody has never even heard of this particular word before, why in the world would they immediately feel comfortable in assuming it has anything to do with that other word?  If something I didn't know anything about made me uncomfortable, I would immediately find out more about it to make sure I had a legitimate grievance before running up and making a fool of myself.

And I'll know you'll (rightfully) argue that this example has a much more common word, but having to "immediately explain himself" (which an innocent person shouldn't have to do) is silly.  It would be like saying, "My pop, and by that I mean my father.  It has nothing to do with the derogatory term for Italians."  I mean, where does it end?

And then, of course, are the cases where teachers have been fired or asked to resign or issue apologizes for using the word in academia?  Talk about shooting yourself in the foot!  Teaching the word in schools is precisely the way to END the ignorance and avoid situations where people fly off the handle for no reason.  But instead they succumb to the pressure and punish people for TEACHING, see, EDUCATING a purely innocuous word.

Sigh, I really hate political correctness gone mad.

There is no lingerie in space…

C3PX said: Gaffer is like that hot girl in high school that you think you have a chance with even though she is way out of your league because she is sweet and not a stuck up bitch who pretends you don’t exist… then one day you spot her making out with some skinny twerp, only on second glance you realize it is the goth girl who always sits in the back of class; at that moment it dawns on you why she is never seen hanging off the arm of any of the jocks… and you realize, damn, she really is unobtainable after all. Not that that is going to stop you from dreaming… Only in this case, Gaffer is actually a guy.

Author
Time

Oh, whoops.  Sorry, Warb.  I should add that when I said I "didn't get" what was up with that word, I didn't meant that I don't know why it's considered offensive.  I certainly do, and I should also mention that I never say that word (although it's equal parts not wanting to offend and not wanting to be beaten up).  What I meant by that statement was in what I said later:  that members of the same group of people can both lobby for its status as the filthiest, most offensive word but simultaneous use it as a silly slang word.  That's what I don't get, not the reason for its offensiveness.

There is no lingerie in space…

C3PX said: Gaffer is like that hot girl in high school that you think you have a chance with even though she is way out of your league because she is sweet and not a stuck up bitch who pretends you don’t exist… then one day you spot her making out with some skinny twerp, only on second glance you realize it is the goth girl who always sits in the back of class; at that moment it dawns on you why she is never seen hanging off the arm of any of the jocks… and you realize, damn, she really is unobtainable after all. Not that that is going to stop you from dreaming… Only in this case, Gaffer is actually a guy.

Author
Time

Gaffer Tape said:

... Should we remove any word that sounds remotely like other offensive words just because we're afraid IGNORANT PEOPLE (not an insult, just a statement of fact) are not familiar with certain words and will take them the wrong way?  I'm sorry, but I don't feel comfortable censoring myself just because other people don't know better.

 

I concur. 

To notice, there's an African country called Nigeria !

... And I always surmised it may have the same roots than the other "bothering" word.

...

Author
Time
 (Edited)

Gaffer Tape said:

Yes.  You were ignorant.  That's nothing to be ashamed of. 

oh thanks.  : (

Gaffer Tape said:

But it shouldn't be up to ignorant people to decide these things. 

no, it should be up to reasonable people.   I guarantee you there were alot or reasonable people that did not know what the word niggardly meant and incorrectly assumed it had something to do with the n-word.  You'll no doubt disagree, but I believe it to be a reasonable assumption to make.  Of course that doesn't mean its right to refuse to listen to someone trying to correct you or look it up in the dictionary.

Gaffer Tape said:

 And if somebody has never even heard of this particular word before, why in the world would they immediately feel comfortable in assuming it has anything to do with that other word?  

Oh, I don't know . . . because its spelled and sounds similar to the n-word?

Gaffer Tape said:

  If something I didn't know anything about made me uncomfortable, I would immediately find out more about it to make sure I had a legitimate grievance before running up and making a fool of myself.  

but not everyone is you, and David Howard should have known that. 

Gaffer Tape said:

And I'll know you'll (rightfully) argue that this example has a much more common word, but having to "immediately explain himself" (which an innocent person shouldn't have to do) is silly.  It would be like saying, "My pop, and by that I mean my father.  It has nothing to do with the derogatory term for Italians."  I mean, where does it end?

my answer to this is what you stated above, pop is a common word.  

As for an innocent person having to immediately explain himself,   he doesn't have to all.    But if he doesn't, wrong or right he is asking for trouble.    I would explain myself  just to avoid the trouble, and because I wouldn't want someone thinking that I was some sort of racist. 

Gaffer Tape said:

And then, of course, are the cases where teachers have been fired or asked to resign or issue apologizes for using the word in academia?  Talk about shooting yourself in the foot!  Teaching the word in schools is precisely the way to END the ignorance and avoid situations where people fly off the handle for no reason.  But instead they succumb to the pressure and punish people for TEACHING, see, EDUCATING a purely innocuous word.

I'd have to know the details behind these firings and the context and exactly what these teachers said and did in order to render an opinion.   But yes, sometime this sort of stuff goes too far.  

Gaffer Tape said:

Sigh, I really hate political correctness gone mad.

I do too.  We just disagree on whether this is a case of it gone mad or not.

Author
Time

A B C said:

To notice, there's an African country called Nigeria !

yes, and everyone knows of its existence, so there is no chance that someone will confuse that word with the n-word.

Author
Time
 (Edited)

Warb, I think you're confusing the word ignorant.  Again, it's not an insult.  It just means a lack of knowledge.  You admitted you did not know what niggardly meant.  Therefore, you were ignorant to its meaning, just like I am ignorant in the realm of cars.  "Reasonable" and "ignorant" aren't antonyms.  They aren't in any way related, actually.  If these "reasonable" people you mention didn't know what the word niggardly meant, they're still ignorant, no matter how reasonable they are. 

My main problem is that this reeks of a reversal of "innocent until proven guilty."  Just like in the Politics thread before, I get the impression that you take circumstantial evidence and assume someone is racist due to related, but not necessarily damning, information.  Like when you insinuated earlier in this thread that a person who uses the word "niggardly" might just be using it because they're aware of its connection to the other word and have some hidden, racially insensitive meaning. 

Just to make it clear, I'm not trying to call you out.  I'm genuinely enjoying this debate, and I hope you are too.  If not, or if you feel I'm saying anything out of line, let me know, and I'll lay off.  But if you're willing to keep going, so am I, and you can feel free not to hold back.

There is no lingerie in space…

C3PX said: Gaffer is like that hot girl in high school that you think you have a chance with even though she is way out of your league because she is sweet and not a stuck up bitch who pretends you don’t exist… then one day you spot her making out with some skinny twerp, only on second glance you realize it is the goth girl who always sits in the back of class; at that moment it dawns on you why she is never seen hanging off the arm of any of the jocks… and you realize, damn, she really is unobtainable after all. Not that that is going to stop you from dreaming… Only in this case, Gaffer is actually a guy.

Author
Time

Gaffer Tape said:

My main problem is that this reeks of a reversal of "innocent until proven guilty." 

except he wasn't on trial.

let me put it this way.   We back when this originally happened and first heard the word niggardly, which sounds just like the n-word with a suffix added to it.   You never never heard nor knew anything about the word niggardly.   If you had to bet your whole life savings on whether or not niggardly had something to do with the n-word, and you couldn't look it up or do any research on it,  what would you do?  I bet that it had something to do with the n-word cause 99% of the time, I'd be right.   This was just the 1% that I wouldn't be. 

Gaffer Tape said:

Just like in the Politics thread before, I get the impression that you take circumstantial evidence and assume someone is racist due to related, but not necessarily damning, information. 

me and whole lot of other people in the world.   There are those alot worse at that then I am.  Just take a lot at Al Sharpton.   But I this is something I need to work on.

Gaffer Tape said:

Like when you insinuated earlier in this thread that a person who uses the word "niggardly" might just be using it because they're aware of its connection to the other word and have some hidden, racially insensitive meaning. 

it is possible isn't it? I can't conclude it to be the truth.  It is certainly not proof beyond a reasonable doubt.   But I think I can suspect it.

Gaffer Tape said:

Just to make it clear, I'm not trying to call you out.  I'm genuinely enjoying this debate, and I hope you are too.  If not, I'll lay off.  But if you're willing to keep going, so am I, and you can feel free not to hold back.

I can't free to not hold back.   I've already lost 1 friendship too many.

Author
Time

Sure you can, at least with me.  If things ever start to get heated, we call it off and take a moment.  I don't take offense easily.  I admit I'm sensitive, but I rarely just assume a friend is trying to seriously take the piss out of me.  But like I said, always feel free to let me (or anyone else here for that matter) know if I go too far as well, because I certainly don't want to hurt anyone's feelings, and give me the benefit of the doubt that I would certainly not intend to.

So, carrying on...

Warbler said:

except he wasn't on trial.

let me put it this way.   We back when this originally happened and first heard the word niggardly, which sounds just like the n-word with a suffix added to it.   You never never heard nor knew anything about the word niggardly.   If you had to bet your whole life savings on whether or not niggardly had something to do with the n-word, and you couldn't look it up or do any research on it,  what would you do?  I bet that it had something to do with the n-word cause 99% of the time, I'd be right.   This was just the 1% that I wouldn't be. 

Except he was on trial.  Not an official one.  But he lost his job over it.  Debating over someone's job is not an instance where you have to bet everything in a single moment without the aid of any kind of resource materials.  And it certainly isn't an instance where it should be.  Not that I think that's what happened in this scenario.  I really think it's more of a case of bowing down to pressure.  Playing the racism card is really an easy out for pretty much everything.  It's the squeaky wheel that gets the oil.  And it's because of that that the idiot aide isn't the focal point of this controversy.  HE should be.  Because he passed from ignorance to idiocy when he lost a man his job on a ridiculous, trumped-up charge, without bothering to educate himself before foolishly playing the race card.

I'm not sure if you read through the whole Wikipedia article I linked to, but this is what Julian Bond, then head of the NAACP had to say about the incident:

"You hate to think you have to censor your language to meet other people's lack of understanding", he said. "David Howard should not have quit. Mayor Williams should bring him back — and order dictionaries issued to all staff who need them."

Also, according to Wikipedia:  "Bond also said, 'Seems to me the mayor has been niggardly in his judgment on the issue' and as a nation we have a 'hair-trigger sensibility' on race that can be tripped by both real and false grievances."

So, yes, a quote from not only a black man, but a black man in the number one position of wanting to stop racism against black people condemning the reaction of ignorant, overly-sensitive people.  Because he realizes, I'm sure, that playing the race card prematurely and being hypersensitive will do nothing to either further race relations or further intellectual enlightenment.

There is no lingerie in space…

C3PX said: Gaffer is like that hot girl in high school that you think you have a chance with even though she is way out of your league because she is sweet and not a stuck up bitch who pretends you don’t exist… then one day you spot her making out with some skinny twerp, only on second glance you realize it is the goth girl who always sits in the back of class; at that moment it dawns on you why she is never seen hanging off the arm of any of the jocks… and you realize, damn, she really is unobtainable after all. Not that that is going to stop you from dreaming… Only in this case, Gaffer is actually a guy.

Author
Time

Gaffer, I'll get back to after a little bit.  Please let me think about what you've said.

Author
Time
 (Edited)

Yeah, I do that with the editing trick.....

Im not touching on what Gaffer said...

Can this tread not get reverterted back to moi, S'il vous plait?

Author
Time

Darth Solo said:

/:-(

FFS im not mad at you really...

Was that addressed at me? Not sure if you understood or not, but I was on your side on this one and was defending you. Just making sure we are clear.

 

Reason: You on your period CPX)

Haha! That really made me laugh, thanks for cheering me up. Yeah, something like that. :)

"Every time Warb sighs, an angel falls into a vat of mapel syrup." - Gaffer Tape

Author
Time
 (Edited)

Warbler said:

C3PX, go to a meeting of the NAACP and use the n-word and see what kind of reaction you get there and then come back here tell me that our reaction was over the top.   If you come to Camden, NJ(a largely black city) and use that word, there is a good chance you'll get beat up or worse.

Yet all those same people you mentioned, both the people at the NAACP meeting and the fine folks of Camden, NJ, would happily use the word themselves, or at the very least listen/watch media that uses it frequently and not mind it a bit. It is people of their race who stuff their music and movies full of casual usages of that word, and they market it to everyone, regardless of skin color. And yet expect that some dumb white 12 year old who is big time into 50 cent or Tupac, or people from other countries who we export these things to, aren't going to pick up those words and want to use them.

It is a dumb cultural standard we currently have in America.

 

C3PX, you being an American know how offensive that word is perceived here, so I can't understand this calling our reaction over the top.   All I did was say that I didn't like the use of the racial slurs and asked that we refrain from using them.   Its not like I cursed him out and called him names or went to Jay and asked for him to be banned.

You guys jumped on a guy who used it in an obvious non-racist context, without even knowing what his skin color was to start with, or without even realizing that the word has much less offensive meanings in most of the world. Sorry if I feel that was over the top.

I'm not really in the mood to read an entire sermon of yours, Warb, so forgive me if I forgo our traditional paragraph-by-paragraph response on this one.

 

Warbler said:

to be honest,  until that incident with David Howard, I hadn't ever heard of the word niggardly.    To use such an unusual word, knowing how similar it sounds and is spelled to the n-word,   and not immediately explain the difference between the two words is asking for trouble.   David Howard(unless he is real stupid) had to know that what he said was going to be misinterpreted.   What does it say about him that he didn't make himself more clear or choose another word?

I have heard that word used with relative frequency all of my life.

Hard to believe David Howard, the poor bastard who seemingly has a half way decent vocabulary about him, is the one being accused of being "real stupid".

Why had he to have known that what he said was going to be misinterpreted? I use that word from time to time, and never once have I ever considered the potential of such an asinine misunderstanding taking place.

 

Warbler said:

 We are not talking about a word that anyone with a highschool education would have known.  It is a very unusual word.

I have a hard time believing this discussion is taking place. You are pretty presumptuous, assuming everyone to fit in line with your view of things. What gives you the impression that it is such an uncommon word that no one with anything less than a college education would have known? Is this simply based on the fact that you yourself didn't know the word?

I have known that word and heard it in use since I was in grade school. I think most people with a tendancy to read would likely be familiar with this word, or at least have seen it in print before.

"Every time Warb sighs, an angel falls into a vat of mapel syrup." - Gaffer Tape

Author
Time

A B C said:

I concur. 

To notice, there's an African country called ******* !

... And I always surmised it may have the same roots than the other "bothering" word.

...

Holy shit ABC! How could you! Don't worry, I fixed it for you.

"Every time Warb sighs, an angel falls into a vat of mapel syrup." - Gaffer Tape

Author
Time
 (Edited)

C3PX said:

I'm not really in the mood to read an entire sermon of yours, Warb, so forgive me if I forgo our traditional paragraph-by-paragraph response on this one.

... It's a sport actually. It's called "Post Breaking"...

^

Warb (black belt)

Author
Time

A B C said:

C3PX said:

I'm not really in the mood to read an entire sermon of yours, Warb, so forgive me if I forgo our traditional paragraph-by-paragraph response on this one.

... It's a sport actually. It's called "Post Breaking"...

^

Warb (black belt)

whatever,  if you look just above your post, you'll see C3PX did the same thing that I do.  Why don't you attack him for it?  Its my posting style and I'm not going to change it.  I'm sick of people attacking me for it.   The quote button was invented for a reason.

Gaffer Tape said:

Warbler said:

except he wasn't on trial.

let me put it this way.   We back when this originally happened and first heard the word niggardly, which sounds just like the n-word with a suffix added to it.   You never never heard nor knew anything about the word niggardly.   If you had to bet your whole life savings on whether or not niggardly had something to do with the n-word, and you couldn't look it up or do any research on it,  what would you do?  I bet that it had something to do with the n-word cause 99% of the time, I'd be right.   This was just the 1% that I wouldn't be. 

Except he was on trial.  Not an official one.  But he lost his job over it.  Debating over someone's job is not an instance where you have to bet everything in a single moment without the aid of any kind of resource materials.  And it certainly isn't an instance where it should be.  Not that I think that's what happened in this scenario.  I really think it's more of a case of bowing down to pressure. 

while it is important to note that he wasn't fired, he resigned,   I agree with you Gaffer.   My point was that the initial reaction was understandable, and that David Howard could have saved himself alot of trouble if he had used his head.

Gaffer Tape said:

Playing the racism card is really an easy out for pretty much everything.  It's the squeaky wheel that gets the oil. 

I agree here too.  The race card is played way too much. 

Gaffer Tape said:

And it's because of that that the idiot aide isn't the focal point of this controversy.  HE should be.  Because he passed from ignorance to idiocy when he lost a man his job on a ridiculous, trumped-up charge, without bothering to educate himself before foolishly playing the race card.

true.

Gaffer Tape said:

I'm not sure if you read through the whole Wikipedia article I linked to, but this is what Julian Bond, then head of the NAACP had to say about the incident:

"You hate to think you have to censor your language to meet other people's lack of understanding", he said. "David Howard should not have quit. Mayor Williams should bring him back — and order dictionaries issued to all staff who need them."

Also, according to Wikipedia:  "Bond also said, 'Seems to me the mayor has been niggardly in his judgment on the issue' and as a nation we have a 'hair-trigger sensibility' on race that can be tripped by both real and false grievances."

So, yes, a quote from not only a black man, but a black man in the number one position of wanting to stop racism against black people condemning the reaction of ignorant, overly-sensitive people.  Because he realizes, I'm sure, that playing the race card prematurely and being hypersensitive will do nothing to either further race relations or further intellectual enlightenment.

if that is what Bond thinks,  that's good enough for me. 

C3PX said:

Warbler said:

C3PX, go to a meeting of the NAACP and use the n-word and see what kind of reaction you get there and then come back here tell me that our reaction was over the top.   If you come to Camden, NJ(a largely black city) and use that word, there is a good chance you'll get beat up or worse.

Yet all those same people you mentioned, both the people at the NAACP meeting and the fine folks of Camden, NJ, would happily use the word themselves, or at the very least listen/watch media that uses it frequently and not mind it a bit.

that is true for some of them, but not all them.   I've heard many black people complain about the rappers using the n-word.  Please read the reasoning that I gave gaffer as to why SOME of them think its ok for black people to use the word, but not white people.   Again, I don't agree with the reasoning, but that is what some of them think.

C3PX said:

C3PX, you being an American know how offensive that word is perceived here, so I can't understand this calling our reaction over the top.   All I did was say that I didn't like the use of the racial slurs and asked that we refrain from using them.   Its not like I cursed him out and called him names or went to Jay and asked for him to be banned.

You guys jumped on a guy who used it in an obvious non-racist context, without even knowing what his skin color was to start with, or without even realizing that the word has much less offensive meanings in most of the world. Sorry if I feel that was over the top.

I reacted as any average American would react.   You realize that alot of other forums would have banned him for using that word.   Just go to another forum and use that word and see what happens, and then come back here tell me my reaction was over the top.  

C3PX said:

I'm not really in the mood to read an entire sermon of yours, Warb, so forgive me if I forgo our traditional paragraph-by-paragraph response on this one.

 

not sure how to take that.  btw, I'm in a bad mood too.   I feel that everyone is picking on me and I've had it.    I responded to Darth Solo in what I thought was calm, rational way.   In the past, my react would have been alot worse, and yet still people jump all over me.   I've about had it with this s**t. 

C3PX said:

Warbler said:

to be honest,  until that incident with David Howard, I hadn't ever heard of the word niggardly.    To use such an unusual word, knowing how similar it sounds and is spelled to the n-word,   and not immediately explain the difference between the two words is asking for trouble.   David Howard(unless he is real stupid) had to know that what he said was going to be misinterpreted.   What does it say about him that he didn't make himself more clear or choose another word?

I have heard that word used with relative frequency all of my life. 

I hadn't and I'm sure most Americans hadn't until that incident happened.

C3PX said:

Hard to believe David Howard, the poor bastard who seemingly has a half way decent vocabulary about him, is the one being accused of being "real stupid".

well I don't know what else to call someone who doesn't stop think about using such and unusual and unknown word that is so easily confusable with the n-word.

C3PX said:

Why had he to have known that what he said was going to be misinterpreted?

because it sounds so much like the n-word?   I would think any reasonably intelligent person would have been able to figure out that trouble was going to happen. 

C3PX said:

I use that word from time to time, and never once have I ever considered the potential of such an asinine misunderstanding taking place.

Most of America does use that word, I'll bet my life savings that not much of American knew of the existence of that word until David Howard used it. 

C3PX said:

Warbler said:

 We are not talking about a word that anyone with a highschool education would have known.  It is a very unusual word.

I have a hard time believing this discussion is taking place. You are pretty presumptuous, assuming everyone to fit in line with your view of things.

I could say the same thing to you.

C3PX said:

What gives you the impression that it is such an uncommon word that no one with anything less than a college education would have known? Is this simply based on the fact that you yourself didn't know the word?

I guess so,  and based on the fact that I didn't consider myself to be stupid.  I consider myself of average education.   I had and still have good reading skills.   I may not read as much you,  but I know a large vocabulary of words.  I know some pretty fancy words.   I didn't know that word,  and I doubt alot of Americans at the time knew it.     You really think that if you took a time machine back to before the incident happened and did a national survey and asked people to define the word niggardly,  that a large majority would be to do it correctly and would confuse it with n-word?

C3PX said:

I have known that word and heard it in use since I was in grade school. I think most people with a tendancy to read would likely be familiar with this word, or at least have seen it in print before.

you must have been one smart grade schooler and I and much of America must be pretty stupid.  

Author
Time

Warbler said:

A B C said:

C3PX said:

I'm not really in the mood to read an entire sermon of yours, Warb, so forgive me if I forgo our traditional paragraph-by-paragraph response on this one.

... It's a sport actually. It's called "Post Breaking"...

^

Warb (black belt)

whatever,  if you look just above your post, you'll see C3PX did the same thing that I do.  Why don't you attack him for it?  Its my posting style and I'm not going to change it.  I'm sick of people attacking me for it.   The quote button was invented for a reason.

Warb, you are not being attacked here, buddy. It is a joke, and a pretty funny one too. Laugh at it, it will make you feel good. Yeah, I do the same thing in our long debates, it is the most expediant way to cover a post point-by-point. The reason why ABC doesn't attack me for it is because he is not attacking you for it.

When you say you are sick of people attacking you for it, who else are you talking about? Have people complained to you about it?

"Every time Warb sighs, an angel falls into a vat of mapel syrup." - Gaffer Tape

Author
Time

ok,  I'm sorry I overreacted.   as to who else, I no one else has done it here recently.    But I have had others complain about my posting style.   It happened on other forums and it may have happened here a long time ago(before my long hiatus).   I guess I just have to get over it.   

Author
Time
 (Edited)

Warbler said:

while it is important to note that he wasn't fired, he resigned,   I agree with you Gaffer.   My point was that the initial reaction was understandable, and that David Howard could have saved himself alot of trouble if he had used his head.

But you do realize it was a forced resignation, right? He couldn't have kept his job if he wanted to. "Resignation" is a fancy synonym for "fired", allowing the person being fired an opportunity to "save face". Had he not opted to take the dignified way out and resign, he would have been fired. That is how it works with things like this.

 

Also, according to Wikipedia:  "Bond also said, 'Seems to me the mayor has been niggardly in his judgment on the issue' and as a nation we have a 'hair-trigger sensibility' on race that can be tripped by both real and false grievances."

if that is what Bond thinks,  that's good enough for me. 

Is it perhaps okay for Bond to use this word, without suspicion of racism, based on the fact that he is black?

C3PX said:

Yet all those same people you mentioned, both the people at the NAACP meeting and the fine folks of Camden, NJ, would happily use the word themselves, or at the very least listen/watch media that uses it frequently and not mind it a bit.

that is true for some of them, but not all them.   I've heard many black people complain about the rappers using the n-word.  Please read the reasoning that I gave gaffer as to why SOME of them think its ok for black people to use the word, but not white people.   Again, I don't agree with the reasoning, but that is what some of them think.

I know not all of them agree with its usage as slang. I read every bit of your posts, so I have read your explanation to Gaffer, there is nothing there I didn't already know. I know why SOME of them think it is okay, and I frankly could care less. That has NOTHING to do with my point. My point is, you have products and you are selling them to impressionable audiences of varying ethnicities, then you act shocked when they use catch phrases and slang that come from those products.

The fact that SOME African Americans feel it is okay to use that word in those contexts, just so long as you are the right shade of brown, and feel comfortable with having the entertainment media bursting at the seems with it, is a problem for ALL African Americans. Maybe instead of going wide eyed when a young teenager, who doesn't know any better and who is head over heels in love with his favorite rapper, uses the "N-word"; maybe they ought to turn their focus over to the cause and point finger where they belong. Instead of screaming "racist" at the poor kid who uses the word mimicking people he admires or thinks are cool and clearly has no racist intent; perhaps the focus needs to be turned to their own community and the effect they are having on people of other shades of brown need to be more carefully considered by all.

You mentioned slave owners using the word to refer to their slaves, well, the word has taken a huge shift in meaning since then. It has gone from derogatory slur to friendly slang. The old slave owners and the fifteen year old white O.D.B. fan have two entirely different meanings and intents behind that word, so why should the fifteen year old be treated like a slave owner for using it?

Maybe the world needs to except the fact that the meaning of this word has changed (not to say the old usage is invalid, but much like the word "gay", it simply doesn't always mean "happy" anymore) and not be so sensitive about it when used in a non-racist context (coming full circle, Darth Solo's post and the reaction it received being a perfect example of the above mentioned sensitivity as well the non-racist context). Or maybe they need to simply stop their people from selling that sort of stuff to white fifteen year olds.

I reacted as any average American would react.  

I am afraid you are probably right, hence my annoyance at Americans and their inherent lack in ability to understand anyone who doesn't also happen to be an Americans.

You complained about me being harsh on Americans, but I guess that is my own personal N-word. I am an American, so I have the right to complain about them all I like.

 

You realize that alot of other forums would have banned him for using that word.   Just go to another forum and use that word and see what happens, and then come back here tell me my reaction was over the top.  

That is pretty sad. I guess when it comes to the internets where we are all faceless there are two basic assumptions about you, 1). You are an American, and 2). You are white.

 

 

C3PX said:

I'm not really in the mood to read an entire sermon of yours, Warb, so forgive me if I forgo our traditional paragraph-by-paragraph response on this one.

 

not sure how to take that.  btw, I'm in a bad mood too.   I feel that everyone is picking on me and I've had it.    I responded to Darth Solo in what I thought was calm, rational way.   In the past, my react would have been alot worse, and yet still people jump all over me.   I've about had it with this s**t. 

Suit yourself. You were not the only one that reacted that way to Darth Solo, yet you singled yourself out as being the victim. My original "jump all over" was not addressed directly or solely at you. React as you like. It is obviously something you feel strongly about, so I'd encourage you to do what you feel is right. I also feel strongly about the subject, so I too felt the need to pipe up and say something.

 

 

I have heard that word used with relative frequency all of my life. 

I hadn't and I'm sure most Americans hadn't until that incident happened.

How in hell can you possibly assume ANYTHING about what MOST Americans did or did not know? You paint a picture of an America that is extremely ignorant and illiterate. It is kind of depressing, but in all reality, you are beginning to convince me that it might be true, at the very least, in the part of the country you are from.

 

C3PX said:

Hard to believe David Howard, the poor bastard who seemingly has a half way decent vocabulary about him, is the one being accused of being "real stupid".

well I don't know what else to call someone who doesn't stop think about using such and unusual and unknown word that is so easily confusable with the n-word.

Maybe he, like myself, never felt it was an unusual word. I'd never have stopped and thought twice before using it before I heard about this incident. I guess I am "real stupid" as well. Fair enough, everything else seems to have been turned ass upward with this whole thing, why not just go with the flow.

 

because it sounds so much like the n-word?   I would think any reasonably intelligent person would have been able to figure out that trouble was going to happen. 

Fine, I'll give you this one. Some people are pretty unintelligent to any reasonable degree, apparently, and they know what words mean and don't give a second thought to intelligent people who may be clueless to said word, and who might, very academically I might add, automatically assume it means the same thing as a word that sounds like it.

In the war against ignorance, enlightenment and education have taken a devastating loss here.

 

Most of America does [C3PX's note: I assume "not" is suppose to be here] use that word, I'll bet my life savings that not much of American knew of the existence of that word until David Howard used it. 

I find it really odd that you are so certain that so few people knew that word, based on the fact that you yourself didn't know it.

I'd have to argue that it is a word that shows up fairly often in works that most high school educated Americans ought to have read, such as many of the works of Shakespeare, for example. To me, it stands to reason that, having been exposed to the word there, had they not known what it meant upon first reading it, they would have looked it up like most sensible people do upon encountering an unknown word. I refuse to believe that "Not much of America knew of the existence" of a word that appears multiple times in books such as Hamlet, The Canterbury Tales, and Paradise Lost, two of which are in most high schools in the US still required reading.

 

I have a hard time believing this discussion is taking place. You are pretty presumptuous, assuming everyone to fit in line with your view of things.

I could say the same thing to you.

What have I been presumptuous about? Did I make the claim that MOST Americans do or don't know something simply based on the fact that I myself don't know something. I honestly can't say how many Americans are educated enough to know what that word means, I'd hope for the sake of my own faith in the American education system that it is higher than what you claim, and I honestly think it is. It would be quite a presumptuous claim for me to say that MOST Americans know exactly what it means. I simply don't think it is as uncommon as you seem to believe it is.

 

You really think that if you took a time machine back to before the incident happened and did a national survey and asked people to define the word niggardly,  that a large majority would be to do it correctly and would confuse it with n-word?

I never heard of this incident before reading Gaffer's link yesterday. I have heard that word in use since childhood, and had I not known of its existence then, I was exposed to it numerous times in high school and again in university. 

I have no idea what the results of a national survey would have revealed. Perhaps you are right, and it would have revealed that we are a dumbfoundingly stupid nation that doesn't even bother to try to learn its own language.

 

C3PX said:

I have known that word and heard it in use since I was in grade school. I think most people with a tendancy to read would likely be familiar with this word, or at least have seen it in print before.

you must have been one smart grade schooler and I and much of America must be pretty stupid.  

Another unfair presumption.

I was not trying to claim to be an ubermensch by saying I knew that word as a kid, I was trying to demonstrate that I don't think it is as uncommon and as unknown as you seemed convinced that it is. But you seem to have made up your mind that it was an incredibly uncommon and obscure word that no mere mortal would have known about prior to this incident, despite the fact that it is used in some of the most popular and best selling works in all of English literature.

It is used many times in the King James Version of the Bible, which has been the most popular and widely used English translation of the Bible for a very long time.

Now that I think about it, I am pretty sure it is used several times in The Lord of the Rings, and maybe even in The Hobbit. J.R.R. Tolkien even named the titular character of one of his stories a derivative of the word "Niggard" (Leaf By Niggle).

I simply don't think, and have a hard time being convinced, that the word is as uncommon or as unknown as you think it is.

 

"Every time Warb sighs, an angel falls into a vat of mapel syrup." - Gaffer Tape

Author
Time

Moo!

You can never go home again, but i guess you can shop there.

Author
Time

Since at least some of this is directed at me, I should probably respond, but I don't really feel like it.  I'll just repeat that I am sorry for jumping on Darth Solo, but it was partly driven by an earlier incident, and further fueled by his joke even after it was clear Warb and I were upset.

That didn't sound like an apology, did it? ;-)

Sorry again Darth.  I believe my heart was in the right place but I should have been more gentle in leading you to the reason why you shouldn't use that word.

Author
Time

Reason: tread de-railed....its spent

No, no, it hasn't derailed. Just learn how to transform somthing like "nothing much" in ... eerrrr...

... "Nothing more".

Author
Time

I thought I already said this thread is now about meatballs

wtf?

Moth3r said: No, there is no video embedding option in this forum software (thank god!)

 

Author
Time

Believe it or not, I just found the same character as a statue !...

 

File:Brebie de voyage (sculpture).JPG