My feeling was always that it was just "unavailable" to him. Because the 2004 clip showed that the negative was fine. If, Reverend Beastly, it is true that it is just an alternate take then that is unfortunate. Personally, I don't believe that. It looks the same as the bootleg, and it's two or three shots edited together in a full cut, not just a single set up.
Post #418838
- Author
- zombie84
- Parent topic
- Info: Return of the Ewok - is the original 16mm really lost?
- Link to post in topic
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/418838/action/topic#418838
- Date created
- 7-Jun-2010, 3:16 AM