
- Time
- Post link
Thanks Frink. I'd best keep both of 'em.
Thanks Frink. I'd best keep both of 'em.
No problem. It's been fixed.
Your giant cash bribe is in the mail.
I knew it! Frink, I'm taking to court!
Warb, you need a name and an avatar based on a comic book character. Then you can be in our secret club.
collusion! I knew it all along!
Ah, remember the good ol' days of MLB collusion? :p
Reminds me of "Ken Burns' Baseball". Anyone here watch it besides me?
I did. great series. I hear he's going to make a "10 inning" to bring it up to date.
I'm fine with the 10-team minimum, even if we do have a few guys not actively managing their teams. At the very least, we need them as talent draws at the start of the season. If not, the rest of us would all be managing the 2009 Yankees. I wouldn't dig that at all. This way, we're much more level All Star-wise, but with a few teams being managed by guys like Joe Torre, and a few teams with managers like Cecil Cooper. ;-)
Warbler said:
A perfect game pitched by Phillies pitcher and I miss the whole f****** thing ......
That's funny, because if I remember correctly - and I do............
Btw Anchorhead, I hate the Halladay deal. I was hoping they'd get Halladay and still keep Lee. Giving up a whole bunch of prospects and Lee for Halladay, I just don't get it.
You didn't want Halladay or the prospects last year, but look at you guys now - the juggernaut of the National League (I expect Cincy to drop off). Man - baseball is a strange game that way.
The Astros - well, we're just the AAA team of the National League. ;-)
I can't call us the juggernaut of the National League after being swept by the Mets the way we were.
Yes, I hated the Halladay deal, but sure as heck didn't and don't hate Halladay. I just wish they had found a way to keep Lee. Then, we could be the juggernaut of MLB and not just the National League. yeah, that's right, I'm greedy.
Nothing wrong with that. I'm greedy too. And by greedy - I mean I hope the Astros win a game in June.
;-)
I want the Phillies to sweep the Yankees in this year's world series. That's how greedy I am.
Who wants the Yankees in the World Series? :p
any fan of a National league team that wants revenge on them by beating them in a World series. ; )
Why not give someone else a chance to get beaten? The Yankees will have already been deflated by not getting to the WS. That's good enough for most. ;)
they haven't been deflated enough imho.
Didn't set my lineup early enough and am currently missing Verlander's start. B'oh. Didn't know it was Memorial Day, and on such occasions, there are always early starts. Oh well.
So anyone besides Ripplin want to weigh in on if I should just leave ghost teams alone?
I say leave them alone. But I am just a rookie when it come to fantasy leagues and really don't know what I'm doing, so do what you feel is best.
What's a ghost team? Do they have ghost runners?
Serious question? I'm guessing no based on second question, but want to be sure.
Even my smarty-pants attitude extends to my serious questions.
I guess you are referring to teams that are not actively maintained?
^Yes.
Oh, and forgot to mention...
Anchorhead said:
I'm fine with the 10-team minimum, even if we do have a few guys not actively managing their teams. At the very least, we need them as talent draws at the start of the season. If not, the rest of us would all be managing the 2009 Yankees. I wouldn't dig that at all. This way, we're much more level All Star-wise, but with a few teams being managed by guys like Joe Torre, and a few teams with managers like Cecil Cooper. ;-)
...agree with this 100%
Also, here's where you can see the last time each manager made a roster change (including moving players from starting lineup to bench):
http://baseball.fantasysports.yahoo.com/b1/274328/teams
At this point I'm leaning towards just leaving ghost teams alone for better or worse.