"Then I'd say it has nothing to do with Editdroid - someone somewhere wanted some kudos without the hard work, I guess. Fail ;)"
Perhaps. I don't know why they would want to represent Editdroid, though, if you have a decent thing then you will get the kudos, look at everyone else.
What I don't get is why does the technical description get into some very, very specific information in deriving from an LD? If this is just the GOUT, it seems to reason that they would just state this; most people already seem to assume that it's better than any possible LD capture anyway, so it might even make you seem more legit. And even if you used the GOUT, why fabricate a fairly elaborate process of capturing from an LD? There's no way there could be "confusion" here--either this is more or less as it says, or they simply fabricated it all, and why would they do that? The description of the audio is correct at least, it is the 2004 5.1 with 1993 surround patches, and a mono mix from the Mono Restoration Project.
Something really doesn't add up here.