I like Beck, but only in small doses. He's very sarcastic and goofy- which I can appreciate, but again I doubt he's bringing anybody over the fence with that tact. I mentioned Mark Levin in the other thread, so I guess I'll drop his name here again. He just comes across as so angry and I don't dig the whole "superstar/god" presentation (HE'S HERE! THE GREAT ONE!!!)

I actually really Anne Coulter. But I wouldn't recommend her to any liberals or borderline conservatives because she's just so abrasive. I think if you took her ideas and presented them with less vinegar... I think she'd be pretty hard to dismiss. As is, however...

Which brings me to this question: Is the purpose of a pundit to convince people HE's right? Or to convince the people listening to the pundit that THEY are right?