Hm. So either they used the same technique and hence have the same problem, or it was the transfer to the tapes/disks that was THX supervised, not the actual master--but does that even work that way? I thought "mastered in THX" applies to the master, not the transfering process. If its the same as the DE, then a new master would have to be a copy of the DE master (which was a D1 tape, I believe), making it a generation removed. Does this even make any sense? Something seems missing here.
Post #398285
- Author
- zombie84
- Parent topic
- What was done for the 1995 THX mastering?
- Link to post in topic
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/398285/action/topic#398285
- Date created
- 17-Feb-2010, 6:36 PM