logo Sign In

Post #396441

Author
Mielr
Parent topic
Original Trilogy Reception 1977-1983
Link to post in topic
https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/396441/action/topic#396441
Date created
6-Feb-2010, 12:43 AM


skyjedi2005 said:
How does Revenge of the Sith with the new numbers fall just slighly below return of the jedi.  Jedi was a flawed but great film while Sith was a Turkey.

I refuse to account for the fact that Sith made more money makes it somehow a better film.

By that system Wrath of Khan sucks and JJ Abrams Trek is superior.



I agree 100%

BTW- are the Tomatometer reviews weighted differently? Are well-known movie reviewers given more weight than a blogger? Based on those initial Tomatometer rankings, I'm guessing not.

Joel Siegel and Siskel & Ebert both gave ROTJ great reviews in '83- their opinions are of more value to me than some nameless, faceless fanboy.