This thread is retarded its like who makes better use of cgi Lucas or Lucas, because ILM is a Lucas company who did the effects on Spielberg's films.

Who makes better use of cgi ILM or ILM.

A better question would be Weta versus ILM. My vote would go to Weta.

As to the question this thread goes Lucas gets a goose egg and so does Spielberg. Both used bad cgi.

Lucas on the prequels and Indiana Jones IV.

Spielberg on Indiana Jones IV and War of the Worlds.

The cgi was less bad and in your face in Minority Report and Jurassic Park still i guess thats like half a point for Spielberg.

Neither should be allowed to direct ever again. Spielberg had two duds with war of the worlds and Indy 4 money and time i will never get back, and Lucas the prequels and helped Spielberg ruin indiana jones or was that the other way around?