logo Sign In

Darth Solo's movie i seen last night opinion, be it an old or new filum. — Page 3

Author
Time
 (Edited)

Darth Solo said:

Yeah, eveyfink seems to lead me to fanedit.org, I'll stick with the mess in my sig.

?

That had nothing to do with fanedit.org.  Let me try again...

Use this:

{url=http://originaltrilogy.com/forum/topic.cfm/Darth-Solos-movie-i-seen-last-night-opinion-be-it-an-old-or-new-filum/post/395740/#TopicPost395740}Darth Solo's movie i seen last night opinion, be it an old or new filum{/url}

except replace the { and } with [ and ]

Author
Time
 (Edited)

(1) The Godfather

(2) Its a classic aint it? And its hyped upto its butt cheeks.

(3) Sloooww. But i liked it.

(4) 7/10

Author
Time
 (Edited)

Okay, I'll add my bit to the broth here:

(1) ONG BAK and ONG BAK 2

(2) friend got them on blu-ray on sale over at Best Buy; hadn't seen ONG BAK in a while and wanted to see it again (to see if it came out better than I remembered) and heard all sorts of crazy things about OB2.

(3) ONG BAK is pretty decent!  Story is pretty typical for martial arts movie (main dude - Tony Jaa - lives in poor town, whose sankara.. er, buddha head is stolen.  He must go into the Big City, find former friend and get him to help find said stolen Buddha head, which leads him to a crime kingpin who has been stealing and selling Thailand artifacts.  Needless to say, ass-kicking ensues).  The first time I saw it, it seemed that EVERY big scene with Tony Jaa doing some amazing stunt work did the POLICE STORY triple-take.. yet for some reason, I didn't mind it this time.

ONG BAK 2 though.. HOLY CRAP!  The english dub is quite silly, as the Monty Python folks would say (yet somehow it still fits), but the movie is either crazy fantastic or crazy stupid, all depending on how you take your martial arts films.  I would say this is the best film I've seen when it comes to really showing off various martial arts in action, where the fighting is deadly serious, fast and BRUTAL!  Jesus Christ on a tap-dancing pogo stick is this movie brutal (and not in a SAW way)... you have to watch it just for the things Tony Jaa does.  Plotwise it is again typically simplistic, but again, if you are a fan of martial arts movies you pretty much expect this.

PS: bit of trivia: apparently, Tony Jaa fired the director halfway through filming and took over the director chair himself... and then about 3 weeks later, Tony disappears!  About 3 weeks after that, some of the crew found him in some remote Buddhist temple deep in the Thai jungle and had to be dragged back to finish the movie.

(4) overall, at least for me, I would give both about a good 7-8/10.

         

 “You people must realize that the public owns you for life, and when you’re dead, you’ll all be in commercials dancing with vacuum cleaners.”

– Homer Simpson

Author
Time

Monroville said:

(4) overall, at least for me, I would give both about a good 7-8/10.

Wait, did you just give each a -1/10? ;-)

Author
Time
 (Edited)

TV's Frink said:

Monroville said:

(4) overall, at least for me, I would give both about a good 7-8/10.

Wait, did you just give each a -1/10? ;-)

That would be "7 to 8 out of 10"... "negative 1" (shakes head in disbelief at silliness)...

And V is no H:
how can anyone take you seriously when you post things like "WATERWORLD is better than MAD MAX because it doesn't have Mel Gibson in it"?  Do I even need to get into that one?

         

 “You people must realize that the public owns you for life, and when you’re dead, you’ll all be in commercials dancing with vacuum cleaners.”

– Homer Simpson

Author
Time
 (Edited)

Wait, did you just call me negative1? I demand

an immediate apology because I feel

that you have besmirched my good

name with your categorization of me

when you don't even know me.

 

Immediate apology, I say.

 

Later
-1

;-) ;-) ;-) ;-)

 

Author
Time
 (Edited)

Monroville said:

 


And V is no H:
how can anyone take you seriously when you post things like "WATERWORLD is better than MAD MAX because it doesn't have Mel Gibson in it"?  Do I even need to get into that one?

Oh because I don't share your opinions I can't be taken seriously? That's pretty dumb. Are you a big Mel Gibson fan? If somebody's concerned about anti-Semitism they shouldn't watch Mel Gibson movies (considering what he said about Jews). There's also the issue of the portrayal of gays in Braveheart. Anti-semitism and homophobia are dangerous prejudices which everybody should be concerned about. I wouldn't watch a Mel Gibson film if you paid me. (That doesn't mean I didn't see Mel Gibson movies before he made his remarks about Jews. And I saw Mad Max. It wasn't impressive. Waterworld is a better film even apart from the Mel Gibson question.)

Author
Time

TV's Frink said:

Wait, did you just call me negative1? I demand

an immediate apology because I feel

that you have besmirched my good

name with your categorization of me

when you don't even know me.

 

Immediate apology, I say.

 

Later
-1

;-) ;-) ;-) ;-)

 

 Is negative1 another of your socks? ;)

Author
Time
 (Edited)

Yes! YES! BURN WORLD! BURN! HAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!! Keep the drama coming!

Water World FTW! Mel Gibson is a cock sucking whore! Woooohooo!

 

Vaderisnothayden said:

 Is negative1 another of your socks? ;)

Oh, Fink he found out...

Actually, I am also one of Professor Frink's socks. We all are. Here in the off topic section, we are all just one individual with WAY too much time on his hands who spends all day having conversations with himself.... ;)  <--------  ALL LIES!!!

"Every time Warb sighs, an angel falls into a vat of mapel syrup." - Gaffer Tape

Author
Time
 (Edited)

Vaderisnothayden said:

Is negative1 another of your socks? ;)

Another?  Good sir, I'm sure I have no idea what you are talking about ;-)

C3PX said:

Mel Gibson is a cock sucking whore!

You think he knows Rob?

Author
Time
 (Edited)

TV's Frink said:

Vaderisnothayden said:

Is negative1 another of your socks? ;)

Another?  Good sir, I'm sure I have no idea what you are talking about ;-)

 I mean apart from C3PX.

 

Author
Time
 (Edited)

Vaderisnothayden said:

TV's Frink said:

Vaderisnothayden said:

Is negative1 another of your socks? ;)

Another?  Good sir, I'm sure I have no idea what you are talking about ;-)

 I mean apart from C3PX.

Ha!  That was pretty funny.  Your move, C3PX...

I can't wait until Darth Solo sees what has become of his thread.

Author
Time
 (Edited)

TV's Frink said:

Vaderisnothayden said:

TV's Frink said:

Vaderisnothayden said:

Is negative1 another of your socks? ;)

Another?  Good sir, I'm sure I have no idea what you are talking about ;-)

 I mean apart from C3PX.

Ha!  That was pretty funny.  Your move, C3PX...

I can't wait until Darth Solo sees what has become of his thread.

C3PX has already edited his post to include an admission that he's one of your socks, just around the same time I posted. He must have predicted what I was posting and decided to confirm it. Ok, so who isn't one of your socks?

Author
Time

This is going to make my head explode lol.

Darth - I will actually be trying to watch a few movies in the next week or so and will post on-topic for once :-)

Author
Time

TV's Frink said:

This is going to make my head explode lol.

 That would be... messy.

Author
Time

If your head asplodes, do the heads of all your socks (self included) likewise aspolde?

IT'S MY TRILOGY, AND I WANT IT NOW!

"[George Lucas] rebooted the franchise in 1997 without telling anyone." -skyjedi2005

"Yeah, well, George says a lot of things..." a young 1997 xhonzi on RASSM

"They're my movies." -George Lucas. 19 people won oscars for their work on Star Wars (1977) and George Lucas wasn't one of them.

Rewrite the Prequels!

 

Author
Time

Asplodes? Does that mean your ass explodes? Scattering shit all around? Useful for fertilizing a garden.

Author
Time
 (Edited)

TV's Frink said:

Darth - I will actually be trying to watch a few movies in the next week or so and will post on-topic for once :-)

That would be good, as thats what this topic is for.

Im trying to keep track of the rants but so far none of them have broken the 50 words or less rule. But i ment rants about filums.

I made the mistake of making a joke about jews once.....:-(

Author
Time

http://www.google.com/search?q=your+head+asplode&rls=com.microsoft:*&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&startIndex=&startPage=1

IT'S MY TRILOGY, AND I WANT IT NOW!

"[George Lucas] rebooted the franchise in 1997 without telling anyone." -skyjedi2005

"Yeah, well, George says a lot of things..." a young 1997 xhonzi on RASSM

"They're my movies." -George Lucas. 19 people won oscars for their work on Star Wars (1977) and George Lucas wasn't one of them.

Rewrite the Prequels!

 

Author
Time
 (Edited)

Break it up guys. Your just being childish for responding.

TOPIC-Stay On It, u cunts!

Author
Time
 (Edited)

Darth Solo: said

TOPIC-Stay On It, u cunts!

 

That is incredibly misogynistic you snatch merkin! Not to mention the fact that "you" is spelled y-o-u, and that "u" by itself is merely a meaningless letter.

Oh no! Now my inbox is being filled with angry PMs form my other personalities for having confessed that we are all socks!

That is pretty funny that VINH had figured out that I am Fink before I even admitted it. Smart feller.

Okay, now let's just forget about this whole strange affair and get back to discussin' filums so that this thread can continue to do its jobbie.

"Every time Warb sighs, an angel falls into a vat of mapel syrup." - Gaffer Tape

Author
Time
 (Edited)

Vaderisnothayden said:

Godfather is overrated. As is Brando's performance in it.

I have to disagree with you there.   Imho,  Godfather one of the best movies ever made.    It places 2nd in my list.   Casablanca is 1st in my list.     Brando is perfect in the role of Vito Corleone.    Al Pacino also gives a great performance.   All the actors in that movie do.   You are of course entitled to your opinion.   I'm curious,  why do you believe it to be overrated? 

 

As for Mel Gibson.   I object to the things he said about Jewish people,  but I try to judge his films on their own.    As for gays in Braveheart,  I didn't see anything wrong.   The film takes place in the 1300s gays were much less acceptable, and prejudice against them and other minorities would be common.