logo Sign In

Post #389550

Author
Anchorhead
Parent topic
RedLetterMedia's Revenge of Nadine [TPM 108 pg Resp. [RotS Review+RotS Preview+ST'09 Reveiw+Next Review Teaser+2002 Interview+AotC OutTakes+Noooooo! Doc.+SW Examiner Rebuttal+AotC Review+TPM Review]
Link to post in topic
https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/389550/action/topic#389550
Date created
21-Dec-2009, 9:35 AM

doubleofive said:

There can be no "prequel person" response to this.

There will be - but only because TFN members are the fans who think & believe whatever Lucas tells them to think & believe. I've perused the forum a few times over the years. The level of denial and delusion is disturbing. But I digress....

doubleofive said:

You cannot defend a movie without a protagonist, introduction, plot, or sense. As weird as some of the off topic wanderings, you can't ignore that every point he made was right on the money, though maybe could have been put more eloquently.

 

In a nutshell, that's the reaction I had to Phantom when I saw it. It had no core and no direction. It made very little sense and was (for me) very uninteresting. It felt & looked like a bunch of ideas that never made it past the rough outline stage - as though Lucas just filmed his own hand-written ideas & notes, with no idea of how to connect them - or the realization that some of them shouldn't have been kept.

It seemed more like a bunch of vaguely related vignettes hooked together. For me, there was no emotional involvement what so ever. The fact that the acting was laughably bad certainly didn't help either.

I agree with Double0 also that this video would be taken much more seriously and have more impact if it were polished. It's a touch too home made to generate the kind of discussions it's capable of. However, it is right on the money in it's assessment.