logo Sign In

STAR WARS Movies Animated — Page 18

Author
Time

I think you can show the fall to the Dark Side and destruction of Anakin Skywalker without showing him become Vader.  My simple solution to that is to leave him for dead at the end of Episode 3 before the Vader transformation.

Frink asked:

Who the hell is NotPadme?

Your mom?

IT'S MY TRILOGY, AND I WANT IT NOW!

"[George Lucas] rebooted the franchise in 1997 without telling anyone." -skyjedi2005

"Yeah, well, George says a lot of things..." a young 1997 xhonzi on RASSM

"They're my movies." -George Lucas. 19 people won oscars for their work on Star Wars (1977) and George Lucas wasn't one of them.

Rewrite the Prequels!

 

Author
Time

xhonzi said:

Frink asked:

Who the hell is NotPadme?

Your mom?

Funny.  But not helpful.

Actually, my mom is not Padme.  So I guess you're correct.

Anyone else?

Author
Time

Assuming you wanted a serious answer, it's the only name we've agreed (apparently) to use in discussing Luke's and Leia's mother.  We don't want to use Padme (or Pandababy or whatever the heck her name is) so we use Notpadme.

IT'S MY TRILOGY, AND I WANT IT NOW!

"[George Lucas] rebooted the franchise in 1997 without telling anyone." -skyjedi2005

"Yeah, well, George says a lot of things..." a young 1997 xhonzi on RASSM

"They're my movies." -George Lucas. 19 people won oscars for their work on Star Wars (1977) and George Lucas wasn't one of them.

Rewrite the Prequels!

 

Author
Time

Haha... we decided if we go through with this, then Padme should be promptly RENAMED... So in the meantime, NotPadme is the used name. =)

Author
Time

Luke's, Leia's and Frink's mother, I mean.

IT'S MY TRILOGY, AND I WANT IT NOW!

"[George Lucas] rebooted the franchise in 1997 without telling anyone." -skyjedi2005

"Yeah, well, George says a lot of things..." a young 1997 xhonzi on RASSM

"They're my movies." -George Lucas. 19 people won oscars for their work on Star Wars (1977) and George Lucas wasn't one of them.

Rewrite the Prequels!

 

Author
Time

Excuse me while I continue to dump long form here:
NPT Vader:
Here is my solution to the Vader problem.  I also came up with the idea of an ersatz Vader running around.  Someone here convinced me a couple years back that Obi-Wan has to have several people that could be called his "apprentice" for the lie in ANH to work.  I also thought that there was no Vader equivalent in LPT since the role is divied up amongst Maul, Dooku, and Grievous and I wanted a more consistent Black Knight.  So, I used to think of this guy as the Vader replacement.  Something very Vadery without actually being Vader.  Something like this guy on the cover of the comic- Tales of the Jedi: The Freedon Nadd Uprising. 

But then, like some of you, I thought: What if it was actually Vader?  The first surprise of the NPT!  Maybe regress the costume along the lines of the original McQuarrie designs a little, but he looks like Vader and is called Vader. 

I also thought along the lines of the Dread Pirate thingy, but I didn't plan on spending much screen time on it.  Just suggest that Vader has been around for a while and survived many deaths.  Anyways, the point of the NPT is to show the Fall of Anakin Skywalker.  So we show that.  In the process, we see a lot of Dark Jedi and even 2 or more "apprentices" of Obi-Wan fall as well- though somewhat less spectaculary. 

The difference is that we see Anakin struggle with it.  When he and Obi-Wan fight, Anakin is trying to show Obi-Wan the power of the Dark Side to convince him to join him in using it.  Obi-Wan has to show him the power of the light.  The fight ends when Anakin goads Obi-Wan into striking him aggressively and Anakin falls into the molten lava or whatever and Obi-Wan is instantly sobered because he thinks he killed his friend in the process. 

Anakin is left for dead.  His pregnant wife has not given birth to their son, nor does anyone know about Leia.  To save her from grief, perhaps Obi-Wan starts the lie then and there and tells Notpadme that Anakin died a hero fighting Darth Vader.  The tradegy of Anakin Skywalker is over.  And so is Episode 3.

Saying Anakin died and not making Vader's indentity a mystery seems much cleaner to me.  Also, to TheBoost's point, it does change the ESB reveal from "Wow!  DV is Luke's father!" to "Wow!  DV is Anakin Skywalker, fallen hero of the NPT and Luke's Father!"  But I think this is still preferable to "Luke is reacting this way because he has just learned, after two movies of us knowing better, that Darth Vader is in fact his father."  And by not cutting Anakin out early, we get to see his full fall to the Dark Side.  It does set up right away that Ben hides the truth to protect Anakin's memory and loved ones... But I don't think that works against the OT... rather I think it helps smooth out Obi-Wan's character from ANH to RotJ.  He's doing it out of friendship to Anakin and Notpadme, out of guilt for his own failings, and out of desire to put Luke on the right path.

IT'S MY TRILOGY, AND I WANT IT NOW!

"[George Lucas] rebooted the franchise in 1997 without telling anyone." -skyjedi2005

"Yeah, well, George says a lot of things..." a young 1997 xhonzi on RASSM

"They're my movies." -George Lucas. 19 people won oscars for their work on Star Wars (1977) and George Lucas wasn't one of them.

Rewrite the Prequels!

 

Author
Time

If Anakin is one of many Darth Vader's, isn't this a plot point that should be explianed at some point? And isn't his accepting this identity, as well as the history of this identity, the sort of thing that the OT should have dealt with? Perhaps Palpy could have offered for Luke to become the new Vader?

This is a dramatic and total reinterpretation of the character. Darth Vader isn't one dude... he's like the Phantom. Anakin didn't become Vader, he took someone elses mantel. If the goal of the NPT is to write a series more in line with the OT, I think that would be a step in the wrong direction. In this case, I think the reaction to "I am your father" would not be shock, but confusion.

On the otherhand, the lie starting immediately has a lot of potential. Obi-Wan, who has to know Vader's actual identity, lying to the people around him immediatly (specifically NotPadme) to spare their feelings is an interesting note to his character, withoutreworking our understanding of him in the OT.

And that photo is badass. What is it from?

Also, if there are so many fallen Jedi around, how come they seem to have so little bearing on the OT? And if Obi's apprentices keep going bad, why doesn't he stop training people!?!?

My proposal is that when Anakin goes bad (still Anakin), he leads a contigent of red-sabered former-Jedi as the bodyguards of Emperor/President Palpatine. Yong bold Jedi have always looked up to him because he's badass, and his defection to Palpatine's party leads to a mass exodus from the Jedi Knights. It's not a club of evil like the Sith, but a political schism in the Jedi.

It is this group (The Legion of Lettow) that help wipe out the Jedi. But at some point Anakin/Vader or Palpatine realize that a group of superpowered asskickers with no moral code is not a good thing to have in a new government, and assassinates them all via a bomb in their shuttle.  (Inspired by the Nazi's Night of Long Knives).

This schism lets us have large scale lightsaber battles, whille not having to create some kind of 'Evil' club or having apprentices go bad left and right.

Author
Time

xhonzi - I know the idea of Vader being a sort of title that is passed down has been suggested earlier too, but I'm sorry I just don't like it.  I hope this doesn't sound like I'm always disagreeing, because from the moment I read it (earlier in the thread) I just thought it was fine in The Princess Bride, but wouldn't work in Star Wars (for the reasons TheBoost mentioned). Having said that your post did lead me to consider something. 

We know that at some point there has to be a showdown between Obi Wan and Anakin, which Obi Wan wins.  However, do people see that as Anakin who we all know is Anakin (pre Vader armour) or Anakin who is hidden beneath the helmet? 

I've always imagined it as Obi Wan fighting Anakin in the Vader armour.  That way when it comes to their fight in A New Hope we should all be thinking that last time Obi Wan won, so it shouldn't be a problem, but then when he lets Vader win it has more impact. 

 

TheBoost - I like the idea of a group of jedi following Anakin (though I don't think it should be many because I don't think there should be too many jedi crowded together - perhaps 4), but I dont think I would necessarily make them have red lightsabers, I would say perhaps only Anakin should, but I am admittedly undecided about this.  But rather than having them killed by an explosion, I think Anakin should be ordered to kill them all, this way the idea that Darth Vader hunted the jedi to extinction has even more validity. 

Author
Time
 (Edited)

Johannus said:

 

We know that at some point there has to be a showdown between Obi Wan and Anakin, which Obi Wan wins.  However, do people see that as Anakin who we all know is Anakin (pre Vader armour) or Anakin who is hidden beneath the helmet? 

I've always imagined it as Obi Wan fighting Anakin in the Vader armour. 

TheBoost - I like the idea of a group of jedi following Anakin (though I don't think it should be many because I don't think there should be too many jedi crowded together - perhaps 4), but I dont think I would necessarily make them have red lightsabers, I would say perhaps only Anakin should, but I am admittedly undecided about this.  But rather than having them killed by an explosion, I think Anakin should be ordered to kill them all, this way the idea that Darth Vader hunted the jedi to extinction has even more validity. 

 My idea has been that "The Duel" would be between Obi-Wan and Anakin in white Vader armor (more in line with the Stormtroopers he commands) sans helmet. When Anakin throws his lot in with Palpy, he drops the Jedi robes for blatantly aggressive white armor. Even if it's black, i don't think he should rock the helmet until medically required to do so.

Really, the size of Anakin's bad-Jedi contingent is based on thte total number of Jedi we want in the film. My idea is that there shouldn't be more than maybe 100 Jedi. Being a Jedi is like being a Knight of the Round Table, and a big deal. If, in the first round of murders Anakin and his crew whittle the number to maybe 20, minus the ammount who've gone bad, I could see a final battle of Anakin, maybe 4-6 fellow bad-Jedi, and a contingent of Stormtroopers going against Obi-Wan and a 10 or so remaining Jedi.

During this battle the remaing Jedi are slain, and Anakin's crew could be winnowed down to 2-3. Possibly this battle directly leads to Anakin vs. Obi 1on1 and Anakin taking his lava bath. That way, when Anakin kills his own followers, he does so as full-on Darth Vader.

Anakin killing his own Legion wuld be cool, but ideally in a shady way, just so Ep. 3 isn't too heavy in "Anakin killing everyone' lightsaber fights. Perhaps in a echoing of Anakin killing the kids in the actual PT, Anakin could have his men in a 'victory celebration' and while they're partying lock the doors, ignite his saber, and we cut away.

As for saber color, I like red for the entire legion for the following reasons. I really like the suggestion that all NPT lightsabers are blue, adding a level of symbolism to Luke's green one in ROTJ. If the Legion are all followers, toadies of Anakin's boldness and defiance, red-sabers show they're all copying him as well as making battles a tad easier to follow.

A scene in my outline has Obi-Wan confronting his best pal Anakin, who is now head of Palpy's secret police, and abuot 3/4 to the Dark Side. (another layer is that everyone calls Anakin "Skywalker" and later "Lord Skywalker" when Palpatine promotes him, except Obi and NotPadme. This scene would have Obi-Wan change mode of address, underlying the distance between the two men).

  • OBI-WAN: You can't serve two masters Anakin.
  • Anakin removes his lightsaber, and presents it to Obi-Wan.
  • ANAKIN: Take this. It no longer has any meaning to me.
  • OBI-WAN: Very well, Lord Skywalker.

 

After that scene, Anakin would begin to wield his redsaber, a sign of his no longer seving as a Jedi. In my outline, it's one of my favorite bits, and is echoed in Anakin's final scene with NotPadme, where he challenges her to chose between her duty as the betrothed of Bail Organa, and her passion for him, and she returns to him some token of their love, cementing that she's going to marry Bail.

 

Author
Time

TheBoost said:

If Anakin is one of many Darth Vader's, isn't this a plot point that should be explianed at some point? And isn't his accepting this identity, as well as the history of this identity, the sort of thing that the OT should have dealt with? Perhaps Palpy could have offered for Luke to become the new Vader?

In a way he was though, right?  He says "Now,fulfill your destiny and take your father's place at my side!" instead of "Now, fulfill your destiny and take your father's place as the new Darth Vader at my side!" but would you really have him say that even if you could?  Supposedly, if you take Lucas's PT into account, you do expect that Luke might become a new Darth Somebody in the scene, but they don't address this directly in the scene either.

And it would sort of be a secret that there had been other Vaders too.  So it probably wouldn't come up.

This is a dramatic and total reinterpretation of the character. Darth Vader isn't one dude... he's like the Phantom. Anakin didn't become Vader, he took someone elses mantel. If the goal of the NPT is to write a series more in line with the OT, I think that would be a step in the wrong direction. In this case, I think the reaction to "I am your father" would not be shock, but confusion.

I gave this some thought over the weekend.  I don't think it has to be confusing, depending on how it is handled, but I hear you.  I can't point to any one thing that you said, but I think you are convincing me to steer clear of the many Vaders idea.  How about Mini-Vaders?  Now THAT'S an IDEA!

On the otherhand, the lie starting immediately has a lot of potential. Obi-Wan, who has to know Vader's actual identity, lying to the people around him immediatly (specifically NotPadme) to spare their feelings is an interesting note to his character, withoutreworking our understanding of him in the OT.

As long as he knows that Anakin had turned bad and that he's trying to protect his memory, why would Obi-Wan have to know Vader's actual identity?

And that photo is badass. What is it from?

The McQuarrie Vader costume?  I don't know the history, but it comes up every time I search for McQuarrie Vader on google images.  I dig it.

Also, if there are so many fallen Jedi around, how come they seem to have so little bearing on the OT? And if Obi's apprentices keep going bad, why doesn't he stop training people!?!?

I would have to make another long winded post about Jedi, which I intend on doing soon.  But in short: I think the Jedi would have almost as many turn bad as stay good.  Isn't that sort of the way these things go?  Power corrupts and I think the Jedi Order would do its best to train people to use the power responsibly... but c'mon.  And since the Jedi Light or Dark would all be dead or in serious hiding due to the purge (a non-screen based fact I assume we're keeping in the canon) at the time of the OT, I don't see why there can't be lots of Dark Jedi in the NPT.  As far as Obi-Wan not training anyone else, it seems that he exiles himself after this point in time, and maybe this is part of the reason why.  It also might make the viewer more nervous about Luke if it's that likely to turn to the dark side...   But I wouldn't think Ben's error rate would be ridiculously higher than the rest of the Jedi trainers.

My proposal is that when Anakin goes bad (still Anakin), he leads a contigent of red-sabered former-Jedi as the bodyguards of Emperor/President Palpatine. Yong bold Jedi have always looked up to him because he's badass, and his defection to Palpatine's party leads to a mass exodus from the Jedi Knights. It's not a club of evil like the Sith, but a political schism in the Jedi.

It is this group (The Legion of Lettow) that help wipe out the Jedi. But at some point Anakin/Vader or Palpatine realize that a group of superpowered asskickers with no moral code is not a good thing to have in a new government, and assassinates them all via a bomb in their shuttle.  (Inspired by the Nazi's Night of Long Knives).

This schism lets us have large scale lightsaber battles, whille not having to create some kind of 'Evil' club or having apprentices go bad left and right.

 I think this could work.  It doesn't really fit with a lot of the other pieces I have up in the air... but other than that I have no real problem with it.

IT'S MY TRILOGY, AND I WANT IT NOW!

"[George Lucas] rebooted the franchise in 1997 without telling anyone." -skyjedi2005

"Yeah, well, George says a lot of things..." a young 1997 xhonzi on RASSM

"They're my movies." -George Lucas. 19 people won oscars for their work on Star Wars (1977) and George Lucas wasn't one of them.

Rewrite the Prequels!

 

Author
Time

Johannus said:

xhonzi - I know the idea of Vader being a sort of title that is passed down has been suggested earlier too, but I'm sorry I just don't like it.  I hope this doesn't sound like I'm always disagreeing, because from the moment I read it (earlier in the thread) I just thought it was fine in The Princess Bride, but wouldn't work in Star Wars (for the reasons TheBoost mentioned). Having said that your post did lead me to consider something. 

Don't worry- I don't think you're coming off that way.  I can't say I think the many Vaders idea is really the best, but perhaps the least of many evils.  Allow me to explain the paramaters that lead me there:
Preserve the ESB surprise.
- Which means no Anakin in the Darth Vader Suit and another person we could assume is Vader when Obi-Wan refers to his apprentice that turned to evil and then murdered Anakin.
Stronger Darth Vader Like Presence in the NPT.
-As I said above, I think the Maul, Dooku, Grievous trifecta was much less enjoyable than a singular Vader like villain would have been.  I know it's become an irreversible part of Star Wars by now, but the prefix "Darth" being assigned to every Dark Jedi (including the Emperor?) really rubbed me the wrong way.  So, to avoid the Darth propogation, you could just use an earlier version of Darth Vader rather than having to come up with Darth XXXXX.  And, for first time viewing of the NPT, it would potentially make the character of Vader something of a mystery.  Some surprises or mysteries would be a good thing for the NPT seeing how the twists and turns are an indelible part of the OT, and something that was plainly missing from the actual PT.  And given that you're doing a prequel, surprises are automatically a little harder to come from.

*whew*

Anyways, another Dark Jedi that has an oppressive appearance and basically stalks around all tough like Vader, I think, is still what the NPT desperately (badly wants/needs.)  I really like the more angular look of Vader in the early McQuarrie stuff so I went there.

We know that at some point there has to be a showdown between Obi Wan and Anakin, which Obi Wan wins.  However, do people see that as Anakin who we all know is Anakin (pre Vader armour) or Anakin who is hidden beneath the helmet? 

I've always imagined it as Obi Wan fighting Anakin in the Vader armour.  That way when it comes to their fight in A New Hope we should all be thinking that last time Obi Wan won, so it shouldn't be a problem, but then when he lets Vader win it has more impact. 

 You don't have to give me credit.  There's this little movie out there called Revenge of the Sith which seems to have gone this route as well.  You seem to be doing a very thorough job forgetting it.  Well done!

 TheBoost - I like the idea of a group of jedi following Anakin (though I don't think it should be many because I don't think there should be too many jedi crowded together - perhaps 4), but I dont think I would necessarily make them have red lightsabers, I would say perhaps only Anakin should, but I am admittedly undecided about this.  But rather than having them killed by an explosion, I think Anakin should be ordered to kill them all, this way the idea that Darth Vader hunted the jedi to extinction has even more validity. 

 Maybe I need to give up my vision of full on Jedi vs Dark Jedi battle.  But I have to say that is probably the #2 image in my mind of how the prequels were going to be... right after the one of Obi-Wan and Anakin fighting near a molten pit.

IT'S MY TRILOGY, AND I WANT IT NOW!

"[George Lucas] rebooted the franchise in 1997 without telling anyone." -skyjedi2005

"Yeah, well, George says a lot of things..." a young 1997 xhonzi on RASSM

"They're my movies." -George Lucas. 19 people won oscars for their work on Star Wars (1977) and George Lucas wasn't one of them.

Rewrite the Prequels!

 

Author
Time

xhonzi said:

As long as he knows that Anakin had turned bad and that he's trying to protect his memory, why would Obi-Wan have to know Vader's actual identity?

Perhaps I'm confused.

In ROTJ Obi knows Anakin=Vader.

If Obi knows Anakin turned bad, he's still lying to Luke in ANH. Why replace the currently understood lie lie (Anakin=Vader) with another plot twist that ammounts to the same thing (Anakin=killed by someone who was Vader=but was still bad anyway)

Author
Time

xhonzi said:

 Maybe I need to give up my vision of full on Jedi vs Dark Jedi battle. 

 The way I see it, Vader is special. He betrayed and murdered the Jedi. If he's one of a giant army of Dark Jedi, he beceomes significantly less special.

I also don't see in the OT any sense that the struggle of the past was bad Jedi vs good Jedi. The Jedi were guardians of peace until the dark times... until the Empire, not "until a bunch of Jedi either turned bad, or another competing force of bad Jedi had war with us."

Author
Time
 (Edited)
double post

but let me take this oppurtunity to say I'm glad people are playing here again.

Author
Time

TheBoost said:

xhonzi said:

As long as he knows that Anakin had turned bad and that he's trying to protect his memory, why would Obi-Wan have to know Vader's actual identity?

Perhaps I'm confused.

In ROTJ Obi knows Anakin=Vader.

If Obi knows Anakin turned bad, he's still lying to Luke in ANH. Why replace the currently understood lie lie (Anakin=Vader) with another plot twist that ammounts to the same thing (Anakin=killed by someone who was Vader=but was still bad anyway)

 Let me see if I can clear my end of this confusion up.

I'm proposing at the end of Episode 3 that Anakin is not Vader yet.  That Episode 3 ends with his death- therefore before his rebirth as Vader.  So- Obi-Wan does not know that Anakin is Vader because it hasn't even happened yet.  Somepoint in time before A New Hope, he figures this out.  However, he starts the lie right away that someone else killed Anakin to protect the good memory of Anakin.  If people know someone good (Obi-Wan) killed Anakin, that reveals that Anakin was bad.  If Obi-Wan says someone bad killed Anakin (Vader or Notvader (Frink's Dad)) then that perpetuates the myth that Anakin died a good Jedi.

Any better?

IT'S MY TRILOGY, AND I WANT IT NOW!

"[George Lucas] rebooted the franchise in 1997 without telling anyone." -skyjedi2005

"Yeah, well, George says a lot of things..." a young 1997 xhonzi on RASSM

"They're my movies." -George Lucas. 19 people won oscars for their work on Star Wars (1977) and George Lucas wasn't one of them.

Rewrite the Prequels!

 

Author
Time

TheBoost said:

xhonzi said:

 Maybe I need to give up my vision of full on Jedi vs Dark Jedi battle. 

 The way I see it, Vader is special. He betrayed and murdered the Jedi. If he's one of a giant army of Dark Jedi, he beceomes significantly less special.

I also don't see in the OT any sense that the struggle of the past was bad Jedi vs good Jedi. The Jedi were guardians of peace until the dark times... until the Empire, not "until a bunch of Jedi either turned bad, or another competing force of bad Jedi had war with us."

I think the delted scene about the lost 24 seems to back you up here.  Personally, I don't buy it.  How could there not be Dark Jedi?  How could there not be Dark Jedi in almost equal number to Light Jedi?  It's the line that all Jedi must walk, right?  Does the Force only speak to the pure in heart?  If so, then there is no threat of Luke becoming Vader II (or III or IV or LXI) and you need some kind of convoluted reason for why Anakin fell.

If the Jedi can just as easily be bad as good, then it makes them a big X-factor for the normal citizens of the galaxy and it just might be easier if they all went away and the proverbial baby was thrown out with the proverbial bath water.

IT'S MY TRILOGY, AND I WANT IT NOW!

"[George Lucas] rebooted the franchise in 1997 without telling anyone." -skyjedi2005

"Yeah, well, George says a lot of things..." a young 1997 xhonzi on RASSM

"They're my movies." -George Lucas. 19 people won oscars for their work on Star Wars (1977) and George Lucas wasn't one of them.

Rewrite the Prequels!

 

Author
Time

It's nice to see this thread back in the land of the living.

I always hoped that these ideas would be thrilling and unpredictale no matter which way you watch the movies.  If I - VI, we need to keep the secrets.  If IV-VI then I - III, then we need to play with peoples expectations.  Make it look like the are getting what they figured THEN twist it.

For example: I've always been a fan of NotPadme NOT being a queen, just because everyone expects it.  But it works out really cool if NotPadme eventually ends up with Bail, that would still make Leia his step-daughter AND a princess, but not in line for the throne.  Which kind of explains why she is always princess even after the rest of her family and all of Alderaan are destroyed.

My other question for all of you stems back from pretty much the early pages of this thread:  Who says that the NPT has to be all about Anakin? Way back... it was proposed that the focus be on Obiwan and Alderaan...those things that are taken from us in IV.  This allows us to be more vague with Anakin's fall (heck, I wanted to "kill off" Anakin in Ep II). And hopefully gives us a great story arch for Obiwan about the loss of his friend, the betrayal of a student, and why he would lie to Luke about his father.

The Dark Jedi for me were my use of the Sith concept.  I always wanted them to cross the lines that my version of the Jedi would not.  They would be masked as others have shown here in the past.  Again it gives us wiggle room in EP II for who the bad guys really are.  In fact, in Ep III, I want the audience to actually support these Sith guys right up until they destroy the Jedi along with Vader (oops these guys may have gone too far). Then, since the Emperor is paranoid about others with power, after the Jedi are gone, he has Vader destroy the rest of the Sith.  Thus the DARK LORD OF THE SITH title.  The Emperor keeps Vader around since he controls his life and death because of the machinery in his body.

Author
Time

I just thought I would makes a reply with some of the things I have been thinking for a while now. 

The Clone Wars - most people seem to like the idea of this being the second clone war (because then it shows there is more than one)  but I think it should be the 4th or 5th clone war.  The reason is that we have had 2 world wars in our recent history, so I think mirroring those but in the context of a galaxy would actually make them seem smaller and less of a big deal for that galaxy.  Also if I remember correctly someone made the point that the greater the technology the shorter the war (generally speaking).  This could explain why there have been a number of shorter wars, rather than just two very long ones.  And finally, by increasing the number of wars I think it allows us to suggest they are becoming a real problem, because although the republic always seem to win the wars, they are not going away.  But, I would just like to point out I have no problem with the specifics people have been writing about the war, just think we should increase the number. 

The Vader Secrecy - It islooking like try as we might, this is gonna be the make or break point.  We have to know (or think) that Anakin has been killed by a 'Darth Vader' but obviously we can't show it because of the small details about it not being your run of the mill death.  We then have to have Obi Wan find out the truth, and evenually fight Vader himself, defeat him, and leave Vader with a heavy breathing mask. 

To me, the most convincing way that has been suggested so far is to have Obi Wan train Anakin, then to have him train someone else.  Anakin slowly and secretly begins to turn to the dark side because he thinks it is necessary to 'interfer' more than the jedi allow.  Whereas, the other apprentice seems to take a more obvious slide down to the dark side.  Then there would come a point where Anakin and this apprentice fight, they would both fall somewhere.  Then by the time Obi Wan gets there all we see is one person putting on a helmet (which we recognise as Vader) but we don't know which apprentice it is.  Obi Wan would ask about his apprentice and Vader would reply that 'he is no more'.  This way we maintain the secret (to some degree), Obi Wan learns the truth, they fight, etc. 

The only real problems I see with this is that if after all this Obi Wan goes to NotPadme and tells his lie, then this could make it seem like Obi Wan doesn't actually know the truth himself.  And if Obi Wan has had two apprentices, and both have turned evil, then surely he must have been out of his mind to even think of training Luke himself. 

Oh and whilst I am here I might as well make another plug for NotPadme (who I have been naming Lehra) to have jedi training.  Using the outline I just mentioned, I would have the Obi Wan vs Vader fight at the end of episode II.  Then episode III can be about how Obi Wan, Lehra and maybe a few others would try to stop the other jedi who have left the path.  Basically, episode III would show Obi Wan trying to single handedly stop the collapse of the republic and the rise of Palpatine, but obviously it is too much for him.  When he thinks he is fighting the leader of the fallen jedi he defeats him only to sense that he was wrong.  He rushes off but it too late to stop Vader (who we all assumed to be dead) from killing Lehra.  In this fight Lehra would be well out of her depth but she would be incredibly angry with Vader (we would think it is because he killed Anakin, but after the reveal in episode V we can go back and think, actually it is because she realised who he really was).  And when Obi Wan arrives Vader would be within sight but unreachable (this way Obi Wan realises he is still alive but they don't fight), and Obi Wan would be more upset about Lehra.  She could die in his arms saying something about Vader and Luke, thus forcing Obi Wan to realise he has to stop fighting and run off and protect Luke.  Also after Obi Wan witnesses what Vader is capable of, he would have no doubt there is no good left in him, and therefore, when Luke manages to save him it is an even bigger surprises.  

Author
Time
 (Edited)

Crazy idea for the morning:

One of the things that always annoyed me about the OT was Leia being Luke's sister.  In itself it is not a problem, but when you have the Obi/Yoda talk in VI ("He is our only hope." " No, there is another.") and then see Leia not DO ANYTHING with the force, it just becomes a lame revelation of convenience to push Luke's buttons. (wow, that sentence got away from me there.)

So what if we take this opportunity to do something useful with NotPadme that was not offered to Leia.

What if NotPadme is "force sensitive," but not stong enough to be called for training?  Her being "force sensitive" is what (even unknowingly) draws Anakin to her.  We get to III and she is pregnant and the LIFE inside her gives her the force bump to save Obiwan at some point.  After the slaughter of the other Jedi, this would make Obiwan fear for NotPadme and her unborn child (as he stated in VI). 

I've always thought that the most difficult thing about a NPT is the birth of the children.  Creating a situation where one is born and hidden away, while the other is temporarily ignored, is really a difficult concept for me still.  Any help would be appreciated there.

Author
Time

WheresBlackhawk said:

I've always thought that the most difficult thing about a NPT is the birth of the children.  Creating a situation where one is born and hidden away, while the other is temporarily ignored, is really a difficult concept for me still.  Any help would be appreciated there.

I agree with you here, which is why in the outline I hinted at above I would have Vader say something to NotPadme about Luke, this way we know that he is aware of the son, but when it turns out to be twins the daughter doesnt have to be hidden away, because we know that Vader didnt know about her, so she can just be passed off as Bail's adopted daughter without anyone needing to know who her real mother was. 

Author
Time

xhonzi said:

 

 Let me see if I can clear my end of this confusion up.

I'm proposing at the end of Episode 3 that Anakin is not Vader yet.  That Episode 3 ends with his death- therefore before his rebirth as Vader.  So- Obi-Wan does not know that Anakin is Vader because it hasn't even happened yet.  Somepoint in time before A New Hope, he figures this out.  However, he starts the lie right away that someone else killed Anakin to protect the good memory of Anakin.  If people know someone good (Obi-Wan) killed Anakin, that reveals that Anakin was bad.  If Obi-Wan says someone bad killed Anakin (Vader or Notvader (Frink's Dad)) then that perpetuates the myth that Anakin died a good Jedi.

Any better?

 So we never see Vader in this scenario? Hmmm... could work, although we Obi-Wan still has to know Anakin=Vader.

"We last we met I was but a learner now-"

"What? We've never met!"

Author
Time

xhonzi said:

I think the delted scene about the lost 24 seems to back you up here.  Personally, I don't buy it.  How could there not be Dark Jedi?  How could there not be Dark Jedi in almost equal number to Light Jedi?  It's the line that all Jedi must walk, right?  Does the Force only speak to the pure in heart?  If so, then there is no threat of Luke becoming Vader II (or III or IV or LXI) and you need some kind of convoluted reason for why Anakin fell.

If the Jedi can just as easily be bad as good, then it makes them a big X-factor for the normal citizens of the galaxy and it just might be easier if they all went away and the proverbial baby was thrown out with the proverbial bath water.

But that's what's in the OT. Vader being seduced by the dark side was a big deal, so it must be uncommon. Perhaps the Force does only speak to the pure of heart. It seems likely. Being "Strong in the Force" isn't just a random mutation, but perhaps a special calling.

What do we know about the jedi from the OT?

  • Guardians of Peace and Justice for a hecka long time.
  • Betrayed and Murdered by Darth Vader.
  • They begin training younger than their early 20s, apparently by Yoda or perhaps other Masters.
  • Anakin fell because he was angry and impatient. It is possible he was trained poorly and began too old.

 

If the Jedi can just as easily be good or bad, then they aren't Guardians of Peace and Justice in the Galaxy. They're just a bunch of people with superpowers.

Author
Time

Johannus said:

WheresBlackhawk said:

I've always thought that the most difficult thing about a NPT is the birth of the children.  Creating a situation where one is born and hidden away, while the other is temporarily ignored, is really a difficult concept for me still.  Any help would be appreciated there.

I agree with you here, which is why in the outline I hinted at above I would have Vader say something to NotPadme about Luke, this way we know that he is aware of the son, but when it turns out to be twins the daughter doesnt have to be hidden away, because we know that Vader didnt know about her, so she can just be passed off as Bail's adopted daughter without anyone needing to know who her real mother was. 

I agree with that and would also point out that it is unneccessary to show the birth of the twins.  If you show that Anakin is aware of a son then you can have all of these references to the impending birth of Luke.  You can end EpIII with Notpandababy still pregnant and taken in by Bail, with the birth of the twins to be a surprise to opened later in Return of the Jedi.

I have to say that no matter how you handle it- "hiding" Luke on Tatooine under the pseudonym "Skywalker" is about the dumbest thing I can think of.  Theres not a lot of wiggle room there.  But, with Leia, you can either do something equally stupid or you can try to fix it.  Let me explain- If Notpadme and Bail are betrothed or looking like they might hookup when Anakin "dies" then hiding his daughter with her own mother is sort of ridiculous.  In this case, the Lucas PT is actually preferable where Bail is already married so he can pass Leia off as his own daughter.  Say you take Bail and Notpadme and make them brother and sister.  Notpadme can be "hidden" by Obi-Wan by faking her death and setting her up not as a Princess of Alderaan, but as a servant in the Royal House.  This way she can be close to and raise her own daughter (Do you remember your Mother?  Your real mother?) but to all outsiders it would appear that Bail is raising his own daughter.

I don't think you have to read too much into Leia not dropping the title of Princess once the rest of the Royal Family was blown up.  She would probably not advance to Queen seeing as she had no kingdom.  And to deny her the title of Princess would probably be unpopular politically.  No one has to know that she's adopted for that to work.

IT'S MY TRILOGY, AND I WANT IT NOW!

"[George Lucas] rebooted the franchise in 1997 without telling anyone." -skyjedi2005

"Yeah, well, George says a lot of things..." a young 1997 xhonzi on RASSM

"They're my movies." -George Lucas. 19 people won oscars for their work on Star Wars (1977) and George Lucas wasn't one of them.

Rewrite the Prequels!