logo Sign In

Post #381433

Author
Vaderisnothayden
Parent topic
Star Wars - Poorly Directed?
Link to post in topic
https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/381433/action/topic#381433
Date created
13-Oct-2009, 4:57 AM

 

alek2702 said:

Lucas had (and to some extend still has) great visual sense.

But he was never too good with actors. Even Ford said that he's 'impatient with the process of acting' and most times his only advice was 'faster and more intense'. You can really see that.

He had a great cast for the original and even there some scenes are a bit 'stiff'. Not to mention the PT...

Also ANH lacks of some kind of emotional depth (e.g. your home planet has been blown away? so what, you can still come up with dozen funny one-liners 5 minutes later) and sometimes feels a little rushed.

He can make great visuals and action but i agree that he isn't a very good director.

The acting in the OT was fine. I don't see why people bash the OT acting. The quality of the acting is one of the primary reasons the films are so good. As for emotional depth in ANH, just because the film wasn't entirely realistic about character behavior doesn't mean it lacked emotional depth. ANH emphatically had emotional depth. That's another reason why it's a good film and became so liked.