Sevb32 said:
Seriously, I think with some things it's ok to be "romantically" correct rather than "physically" correct.

i couldnt agree more sevb32. maybe the shot could do with the falcon being a little reangled, but at the end of the day, it makes a point. back when they made this film, would they have actually decided where the bridge was? i always thought it was right at the top somewhere. its all very well pointing these things out in an encylcopedia made over ten or even twenty years later, but i wouldnt be surprised if alot of these things are based on the creative license of the illustrator, not necessarily the prop designer/direcor/storyboard artist.