Hunter6 said:
As the release of Star Trek (2009) comes near, the bad Reviews being to come out.

Star Trek (2009) Reviews

Roger Ebert:
http://rogerebert.suntimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20090506/REVIEWS/905069997

The Age:
http://www.theage.com.au/articles/2009/05/06/1241289237288.html

IGN:
http://movies.ign.com/articles/973/973956p1.html

No movie, even the most acclaimed classic, went without a small handful of negative reviews (and this new Star Trek's handful is tiny.)

I personally don't give a shit about the new Star Trek movie or Star Trek in general, but it is getting overwhelmingly positive reviews.

The only real review I care about is the Peter Travers review, that dude has tastes closest to my own. I don't know why Ebert is so famous (been around the longest I guess,) but he has mostly shit taste in movies. Dude gave glowing reviews to the Star Wars prequels, I remember him giving Phantom Menace 31/2 out of 4 stars with a hyper-glowing review. Those movies were fucking ass.