No rotten reviews, even the greatest films get one or 2 rotten reviews.

Something is fishy. Too much like AICN and Trekmovie.com.

I don't believe it until i see the movie. And they could be tricking us again like they did for revenge of the sith and indiana jones IV being good movies. Because of that Ebert lost an extreme amount of credibility as well as him liking the mummy curse of the dragon emporer.

He gets my respect for his damning reviews of the clone wars movie and Quantum of Solace. But even he admitted he likes dumb entertainment cheeseball cinema that is bad filmaking, how else do you excuse him being a Lucas appologist. I miss Siskel he would have told that the later II prequels sucked doney balls, and that indiana jones IV was a giant stinking turd.

I don't get Indy 4's mostly positive rating on rotten tamatoes. It is certified fresh. When it is most certainly rotten. But in comparison to other modern crap it was good according to these people. So film has gone so low that crap films of yesteryear are better than todays movies.

Temple of Doom was better than crystal Skulls never thought i would ever have thought that. It ties up the Raiders threads in a neat little bow but was that really necessary? Reminds me a bit of Return of the Jedi which i still love by the way,lol.

I think Revenge of the Sith just barely scrapped by with a fresh rating the last time i checked,lol.