Too bad you have to be a member. I am never paying to use Lucas online ever again much less ever resubscribing. The magazine has gone done Hill ever since Dan Madsen left.
Plus Lucash star wars.com website did not put out all the promised bonuses for hyperspace like possible old documentaries, deleted scenes, commentarys. Not only did they remove the DVDrom commentary for the 2004 box set release of star wars and empire strikes back, they never bothered to do one for Return of the Jedi.
I swear other than being a flash animation site, or being spam to sell more Lucash products there is nothing on there remotely even any good. The old site despite the fact it could have been improvements was still better.
I mean its a joke when TFN site is better and easier to navigate than Lucas site. Despite basically linking mostly to the Lucas site, repeating lucas based employee reporting on star wars and indiana jones releases verbatim. And overall kissing ass and gushing.
Still the dvd's are still not fixed and deliberate creative decisions so to ask him to spend any money on website development or content is out of the question especially since the last star wars film was in 2005.
Mielr what happened to being an unabashed Lucas Basher?
By the way dvd or blu ray at this point is not enough the original elements need to be restored and vaulted and a new negative made. They would have to basically restore the o-neg that has been altered in 1997 which robert harris said he was up to the task.
The fact that the films could be forever lost and are rotting in Lucas Archives is unforgivable, since the films need to be safely preserved not just for future home video release but ultimetely new theatrical release prints being viable of the originals. Robert Harris does not consider a film a true restoration is there is no film print to be screened after the process.
What Lucas considers an Archival Master is the one he handed over to lowey at Blu Ray resolution way lower than the total resolving power and resolution of film. A 1080 master is a frickin joke. Sure Lucas can dump that telecine to blu ray of the 2004 and call it a day which is lazy. For the newest Blu Ray releases they scan at least 4k on films shot actually on film and not HD VIDEO. And the VistaVision elements of the oot need to be scanned at least to 6K before bieng reduction printed to a new 35mm master.