ChainsawAsh said:
That's just EU reasoning to explain something that shouldn't have needed explaining, because IT DOESN'T make sense for the first to take 20 years and the second to take 3. Yeah, the second would go by much more quickly than the first, but not THAT much more. At most, I'd say 8 years for the first and 3 for the second makes sense, and that's stretching it. IMO 5 for DS1 and 3 for DS2 makes the most sense.

i can understand wot ur sayin yea but i mean look at the UK takes like 20 years to do anything decent, like the olympic 2012 in london, u really think thats gonna be on time. its already havin problems with fundin etc even at the expense of the tax payer, long delays are possible.