logo Sign In

STAR WARS: EP V "REVISITED EDITION"ADYWAN - 12GB 1080p MP4 VERSION AVAILABLE NOW — Page 236

Author
Time
 (Edited)

Adywan, your latest clip of part of the 'asteroid slug' sequence is simply brilliant!!

I'm very pleased that you are keeping the existing design of it (and it's teeth).  TMBTM's idea of 'retractable' teeth should look quite neat at the start.  The 'slowed down' movement of the slug's 'lunge' really makes a great improvement to the 'scale' of it.  And I see that you've also removed that suspect 'piece of elastic' from the base of the slug.  :)

I also think your additional asteroids look excellent, and I'm really pleased we see the asteroid field beyond the teeth of the slug now, too.  The addition of the 'crater wall' in the shot of the Millennium Falcon escaping is also a terrific addition.  This whole scene is a huge improvement already, and I look forward to what you can achieve with the other parts of it.

I am in awe that you are now planning to physically build a 'slug mouth' (with tongue) interior now....as well as a new 'canyon', ontop of the other stuff.  Wonderful.  You just can't beat that 'old-school' vibe!

 

Sevb32 -  I really like your notion of showing a little more 'ground mist' as the Falcon approaches the teeth by the way.  That slug's tongue and belly is pretty putrid I bet...

doubleofive -  A brief, underlying 'Force choke rumble' during that little Vader/Lando exchange would indeed be neat.  (I hope to definately post those other AT-AT comments this week! ;) )

sketchrob -  Nice one, and I hope that Adywan can even eventually get that CANON HD10 which seems to be the business.  I wonder how many on this site will want one too, now?  They should give him a free one considering they won't get a much higher recommendation.

Ziz -  I don't know if you missed it before, but Ady has previously mentioned that part of the appeal of doing this edit is the fact that he will enjoy making the stuff along the way, himself.  I've come across some shots of his work in the past that he's made, and hope that he will be able do his own stuff for this eventually, if possible.   

ladyferry -  Thanks for the YouTube link as always.

   

 

Author
Time

The slow down really helped that scene

Bingowings said: Do you want to see the project finished as a playable film or a flick book?

Author
Time

i just realised that it is the HG-20 and not the 10 model that i tested out. the 10 doesn't film in 1920x1080p but 1440x1080 instead. i just rang up the shop that i tested it at and although their website lists the 10 model they assure me that its the 20 and they no longer stock the 10.

This is the lowest price i've been able to find for the Uk version

http://www.camerabox.co.uk/product.asp?ProductID=6388&gclid=CLGb6ZSf4ZgCFQHHGgodIGfYdQ

Its just over £100 more in the shop i tested it at but i'm still a couple of hundred quid off getting this baby.

I've been checking out some of the HD videos shot with this camera on youtube. This is definitely the camera to get.

ANH:REVISITED
ESB:REVISITED

DONATIONS TOWARDS MATERIALS FOR THE REVISITED SAGA

Author
Time
 (Edited)
adywan said:

i just realised that it is the HG-20 and not the 10 model that i tested out. the 10 doesn't film in 1920x1080p but 1440x1080 instead. i just rang up the shop that i tested it at and although their website lists the 10 model they assure me that its the 20 and they no longer stock the 10.

This is the lowest price i've been able to find for the Uk version

http://www.camerabox.co.uk/product.asp?ProductID=6388&gclid=CLGb6ZSf4ZgCFQHHGgodIGfYdQ

Its just over £100 more in the shop i tested it at but i'm still a couple of hundred quid off getting this baby.

I've been checking out some of the HD videos shot with this camera on youtube. This is definitely the camera to get.

Here's a review that might be helpful

http://www.camcorderinfo.com/content/Canon-Vixia-HG20-Camcorder-Review-35510/Performance.htm

And I still have to recommend the tape-based HV30 of the hard drive based HG20. Hard Drives are a hassle to work with. Of you can even get the AVCHD footage into your editor render times will be excruciating. HDV is much more time tested. Also 1440x1080 vs. 1920x1080 doesn't really make much of a difference. One is anamorphic and one isn't. 24p/25p is important though

Author
Time
 (Edited)
Octorox said:
adywan said:

i just realised that it is the HG-20 and not the 10 model that i tested out. the 10 doesn't film in 1920x1080p but 1440x1080 instead. i just rang up the shop that i tested it at and although their website lists the 10 model they assure me that its the 20 and they no longer stock the 10.

This is the lowest price i've been able to find for the Uk version

http://www.camerabox.co.uk/product.asp?ProductID=6388&gclid=CLGb6ZSf4ZgCFQHHGgodIGfYdQ

Its just over £100 more in the shop i tested it at but i'm still a couple of hundred quid off getting this baby.

I've been checking out some of the HD videos shot with this camera on youtube. This is definitely the camera to get.

Here's a review that might be helpful

http://www.camcorderinfo.com/content/Canon-Vixia-HG20-Camcorder-Review-35510/Performance.htm

And I still have to recommend the tape-based HV30 of the hard drive based HG20. Hard Drives are a hassle to work with. Of you can even get the AVCHD footage into your editor render times will be excruciating. HDV is much more time tested. Also 1440x1080 vs. 1920x1080 doesn't really make much of a difference. One is anamorphic and one isn't. 24p/25p is important though

i was just reading that review then read what you wrote. spooky. lol

i prefer the hard drive cameras over any tape based ones. i do all my editing on the PC and transferring the footage from a hard drive camera is so much easier and faster than tape based ones. rendering times don't bother me as i've been working with Hd for a while so i'm use to that.

yeh i agree that the 24/25p feature is a very important factor with a camera i would be using to film the elements to fit in with the movie . many seem to do 30fps or 60fps so this feature on the canons is the selling point for me.

interestingly i saw some comparisons between the American 24p cine mode and the UK 25p cine mode and the results for the 25p in motion scenes were so much smoother whereas the 24p mode seemed jerky. having the 25p setting will enable me to change the framerate to 23.976 and the very slight slowdown will help with the feeling of weight and size so the PAL version is perfect for me. do you find that the cinemode on your ntsc version suffers with the jerky movement?

 

 

ANH:REVISITED
ESB:REVISITED

DONATIONS TOWARDS MATERIALS FOR THE REVISITED SAGA

Author
Time

I agree octorox....I have the Canon HV20, and it is awesome. The tape based HD cameras still offer the best quality. You can pick these two cameras the HV20/HV30 for great prices right now as well!

Author
Time
 (Edited)
adywan said:
Octorox said:

I have a Canon HV30 (1080p), it even has a 24p mode. What do you need shot?

it would basically be all the new models and set pieces i'm having to make to replace certain shots. i am shocked just how much the UK is getting ripped off with prices after following those links. The canon would be a godsend because i just love canon cameras ( i own a 350d digital SLR & the quality is unbelievable) but at the prices we're getting charged it could never be a possibility

Is there any way just to order it from the american website and have it shipped to the UK?   Even with a 6% sales tax, it shouldn't come out to more than $636.00.  If you have someone over here you know you can trust, if Amazon.com doesn't ship to the Uk someone here could buy it at the cheaper price and then ship it to you.  I know that's a big risk, but $636 is a lot better than essentially $1009.85 (at least converted through xe.net)

Also, I take it that the US version is locked at the 24fps rate, or can it be altered between different frame rate settings?

         

 “You people must realize that the public owns you for life, and when you’re dead, you’ll all be in commercials dancing with vacuum cleaners.”

– Homer Simpson

Author
Time
ImperialFighter said:

Ziz -  I don't know if you missed it before, but Ady has previously mentioned that part of the appeal of doing this edit is the fact that he will enjoy making the stuff along the way, himself.  I've come across some shots of his work in the past that he's made, and hope that he will be able do his own stuff for this eventually, if possible.

Not doubting his abilities, just making suggestions on how to ease the workload and free up finances from one area of the project to another.

My outlook on life - we’re all on the Hindenburg anyway…no point fighting over the window seat.

Author
Time
 (Edited)
adywan said:
Octorox said:
adywan said:

i just realised that it is the HG-20 and not the 10 model that i tested out. the 10 doesn't film in 1920x1080p but 1440x1080 instead. i just rang up the shop that i tested it at and although their website lists the 10 model they assure me that its the 20 and they no longer stock the 10.

This is the lowest price i've been able to find for the Uk version

http://www.camerabox.co.uk/product.asp?ProductID=6388&gclid=CLGb6ZSf4ZgCFQHHGgodIGfYdQ

Its just over £100 more in the shop i tested it at but i'm still a couple of hundred quid off getting this baby.

I've been checking out some of the HD videos shot with this camera on youtube. This is definitely the camera to get.

Here's a review that might be helpful

http://www.camcorderinfo.com/content/Canon-Vixia-HG20-Camcorder-Review-35510/Performance.htm

And I still have to recommend the tape-based HV30 of the hard drive based HG20. Hard Drives are a hassle to work with. Of you can even get the AVCHD footage into your editor render times will be excruciating. HDV is much more time tested. Also 1440x1080 vs. 1920x1080 doesn't really make much of a difference. One is anamorphic and one isn't. 24p/25p is important though

i was just reading that review then read what you wrote. spooky. lol

i prefer the hard drive cameras over any tape based ones. i do all my editing on the PC and transferring the footage from a hard drive camera is so much easier and faster than tape based ones. rendering times don't bother me as i've been working with Hd for a while so i'm use to that.

yeh i agree that the 24/25p feature is a very important factor with a camera i would be using to film the elements to fit in with the movie . many seem to do 30fps or 60fps so this feature on the canons is the selling point for me.

interestingly i saw some comparisons between the American 24p cine mode and the UK 25p cine mode and the results for the 25p in motion scenes were so much smoother whereas the 24p mode seemed jerky. having the 25p setting will enable me to change the framerate to 23.976 and the very slight slowdown will help with the feeling of weight and size so the PAL version is perfect for me. do you find that the cinemode on your ntsc version suffers with the jerky movement?

 

 

It can be a bit jerky but it generally looks good. This video I shot in the American 24p mode, the "rapping" clips are speed up 2x, the others are mostly normal speed:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fhTTNMjTdXU

 

Also disregard the color because my CC is a little off on some shots. Auto White Balance is not your friend :(

Author
Time

I don't know how Amazon.com is about shipping internationally, but I've ordered quite a bit from amazon.co.uk and they do indeed ship to the US.  My last order took four days to get over the pond and to the midwest!  And that was with standard shipping! :)

I would also assume amazon.com would have no way of adding VAT to your order, so you may save that way, too.

O.T. or No T., baby!

ANH:R Cover Art

ESB:R Cover Art

Author
Time

4 Days to go over the Atlantic on standard shipping?

.....

Then why the hell does it somtimes take WEEKS for things to move about INSIDE the US?

 

Lousy shipping...

The final battle to decide the fate of the Earth is about to begin

 

Where are those cookies i wanted?!?!

Author
Time

Hey, long time no speak, AV. ;)

Yeah, shipping is funny sometimes. I've sent things within the country that took over a week, but then sent something out of the country and it took half the time, even with standard shipping. It's quite unpredictable sometimes.

 

My crazy vinyl LP blog

My dumberer blog

My Retro blog

Author
Time

i know this is out of topic here, but i was watching ESB earlier and i was wondering if

we could update the radars in echo base like ady did in ANHR with yavin base with the

deathstar deal. its somewat believable, but nothing moves on them and when han

finds leia with general reiken in the control room. when a blast comes the panales

wobbled back and forth like plastic or something. anyway to improve that.

Author
Time
rcb said:

i know this is out of topic here, but i was watching ESB earlier and i was wondering if

we could update the radars in echo base like ady did in ANHR with yavin base with the

deathstar deal. its somewat believable, but nothing moves on them and when han

finds leia with general reiken in the control room. when a blast comes the panales

wobbled back and forth like plastic or something. anyway to improve that.

 

How is that off topic?  They were discussing international shipping! :-P

Star Wars Revisited Wordpress

Star Wars Visual Comparisons WordPress

Author
Time

The wobbly panels didn't bother me too much. That looks to be what would happen to them anyway. (sort of thin, untethered sheets of plastic/glass) Plus, the Hoth base looks even more slapped together than the one on Yavin. Heh.

One thing I'm sure Ady will do with those panels is add something like graphics to them so they don't look so lifeless. At least when they're not wobbling.

My crazy vinyl LP blog

My dumberer blog

My Retro blog

Author
Time
 (Edited)
Monroville said:

Is there any way just to order it from the american website and have it shipped to the UK?   Even with a 6% sales tax, it shouldn't come out to more than $636.00.  If you have someone over here you know you can trust, if Amazon.com doesn't ship to the Uk someone here could buy it at the cheaper price and then ship it to you.  I know that's a big risk, but $636 is a lot better than essentially $1009.85 (at least converted through xe.net)

Also, I take it that the US version is locked at the 24fps rate, or can it be altered between different frame rate settings?

well i had been thinking about that but it really isn't viable for me to do it this way. for one it can be a nightmare to transfer the warranty from the US to the UK and if anything went wrong i would be stuck with a dead machine . many large companies refuse to do humour and American warranty in the UK. Then  there's the chance that i get heavily taxed by customs but the main thing is that the NTSC version suffers with the jerky footage when using the 24p mode. The PAL version does suffer with this problem. The thing is that the NTSC machine runs at 30p & 60i. For cinema mode it records at 60i then converts the footage inside the camera in 24p cinema mode which causes the duplicate frames or applied pulldown  because 60 is not divisible by 24. now the PAL machine does 25p cinema mode. the cameras main setting record at 25p & 50i. Because of this no extra frames are added so this results in smooth motion. It would be too much hassle trying to figure out a way to remove the duplicate frames from the NTSC model to be able to use the footage. Plus the voltage differences for the power supply is also a problem between our 2 countries.

The Pal machine purchased from a UK company is the only viable option.

I've got down to needing just slightly under £200 to get this machine now. i'm hoping i can get it pretty soon because the place i was going to purchase from have gone down from 6 left in stock to just 4 in less than a day. i guess it being much cheaper than anywhere else means that it isn't going to last at that price for much longer

in regards to me shipping out the workload for the models etc to save money it really doesn't cost me that much to build these things as i have most of the materials i need around the house anyway, plus i love making stuff anyway.

First thing i'm going to do when i get the camcorder is film the new wampa so you can all see what its like and post the first making of video. i'm using my old crappy camcorder to film the step by step building progress of the wampa puppet for this then the finished puppet will be filmed with the HD camcorder and you'll get to see the complete new scene

 

ANH:REVISITED
ESB:REVISITED

DONATIONS TOWARDS MATERIALS FOR THE REVISITED SAGA

Author
Time
adywan said:
Monroville said:

Is there any way just to order it from the american website and have it shipped to the UK?   Even with a 6% sales tax, it shouldn't come out to more than $636.00.  If you have someone over here you know you can trust, if Amazon.com doesn't ship to the Uk someone here could buy it at the cheaper price and then ship it to you.  I know that's a big risk, but $636 is a lot better than essentially $1009.85 (at least converted through xe.net)

Also, I take it that the US version is locked at the 24fps rate, or can it be altered between different frame rate settings?

well i had been thinking about that but it really isn't viable for me to do it this way. for one it can be a nightmare to transfer the warranty from the US to the UK and if anything went wrong i would be stuck with a dead machine . many large companies refuse to do humour and American warranty in the UK. Then  there's the chance that i get heavily taxed by customs but the main thing is that the NTSC version suffers with the jerky footage when using the 24p mode. The PAL version does suffer with this problem. The thing is that the NTSC machine runs at 30p & 60i. For cinema mode it records at 60i then converts the footage inside the camera in 24p cinema mode which causes the duplicate frames or applied pulldown  because 60 is not divisible by 24. now the PAL machine does 25p cinema mode. the cameras main setting record at 25p & 50i. Because of this no extra frames are added so this results in smooth motion. It would be too much hassle trying to figure out a way to remove the duplicate frames from the NTSC model to be able to use the footage. Plus the voltage differences for the power supply is also a problem between our 2 countries.

The Pal machine purchased from a UK company is the only viable option.

I've got down to needing just slightly under £200 to get this machine now. i'm hoping i can get it pretty soon because the place i was going to purchase from have gone down from 6 left in stock to just 4 in less than a day. i guess it being much cheaper than anywhere else means that it isn't going to last at that price for much longer

in regards to me shipping out the workload for the models etc to save money it really doesn't cost me that much to build these things as i have most of the materials i need around the house anyway, plus i love making stuff anyway.

First thing i'm going to do when i get the camcorder is film the new wampa so you can all see what its like and post the first making of video. i'm using my old crappy camcorder to film the step by step building progress of the wampa puppet for this then the finished puppet will be filmed with the HD camcorder and you'll get to see the complete new scene

So do you edit in 25p and then stretch it to 29.98 for us Yanks?  The real question is do you work with the sped up audio when you're working on the audio side?  Just curious.

Star Wars Revisited Wordpress

Star Wars Visual Comparisons WordPress

Author
Time
doubleofive said:
adywan said:
Monroville said:

Is there any way just to order it from the american website and have it shipped to the UK?   Even with a 6% sales tax, it shouldn't come out to more than $636.00.  If you have someone over here you know you can trust, if Amazon.com doesn't ship to the Uk someone here could buy it at the cheaper price and then ship it to you.  I know that's a big risk, but $636 is a lot better than essentially $1009.85 (at least converted through xe.net)

Also, I take it that the US version is locked at the 24fps rate, or can it be altered between different frame rate settings?

well i had been thinking about that but it really isn't viable for me to do it this way. for one it can be a nightmare to transfer the warranty from the US to the UK and if anything went wrong i would be stuck with a dead machine . many large companies refuse to do humour and American warranty in the UK. Then  there's the chance that i get heavily taxed by customs but the main thing is that the NTSC version suffers with the jerky footage when using the 24p mode. The PAL version does suffer with this problem. The thing is that the NTSC machine runs at 30p & 60i. For cinema mode it records at 60i then converts the footage inside the camera in 24p cinema mode which causes the duplicate frames or applied pulldown  because 60 is not divisible by 24. now the PAL machine does 25p cinema mode. the cameras main setting record at 25p & 50i. Because of this no extra frames are added so this results in smooth motion. It would be too much hassle trying to figure out a way to remove the duplicate frames from the NTSC model to be able to use the footage. Plus the voltage differences for the power supply is also a problem between our 2 countries.

The Pal machine purchased from a UK company is the only viable option.

I've got down to needing just slightly under £200 to get this machine now. i'm hoping i can get it pretty soon because the place i was going to purchase from have gone down from 6 left in stock to just 4 in less than a day. i guess it being much cheaper than anywhere else means that it isn't going to last at that price for much longer

in regards to me shipping out the workload for the models etc to save money it really doesn't cost me that much to build these things as i have most of the materials i need around the house anyway, plus i love making stuff anyway.

First thing i'm going to do when i get the camcorder is film the new wampa so you can all see what its like and post the first making of video. i'm using my old crappy camcorder to film the step by step building progress of the wampa puppet for this then the finished puppet will be filmed with the HD camcorder and you'll get to see the complete new scene

So do you edit in 25p and then stretch it to 29.98 for us Yanks?  The real question is do you work with the sped up audio when you're working on the audio side?  Just curious.

yes i edit in 25p then the video framerate is slowed down to 23.976 once the video side of things is complete. i then work on the audio after i have done this so everything is the correct pitch. then for the PAL version i can just speed up the audio once finished. I don't bother doing this with all the samples i post so many of the sound fx will always sound lower in pitch but for the finished version they would be correct

 

ANH:REVISITED
ESB:REVISITED

DONATIONS TOWARDS MATERIALS FOR THE REVISITED SAGA

Author
Time
mrbenja0618 said:

There is also this option... http://dvfilm.com/maker/index.htm

 

If you were to find an HD cam cheaper that doesn't have 24p or 25p.... This could help you in huge ways.

 

I think that would have the same "jerky"problem that Ady is talking about.

Author
Time
 (Edited)
Octorox said:
adywan said:

i just realised that it is the HG-20 and not the 10 model that i tested out. the 10 doesn't film in 1920x1080p but 1440x1080 instead. i just rang up the shop that i tested it at and although their website lists the 10 model they assure me that its the 20 and they no longer stock the 10.

This is the lowest price i've been able to find for the Uk version

http://www.camerabox.co.uk/product.asp?ProductID=6388&gclid=CLGb6ZSf4ZgCFQHHGgodIGfYdQ

Its just over £100 more in the shop i tested it at but i'm still a couple of hundred quid off getting this baby.

I've been checking out some of the HD videos shot with this camera on youtube. This is definitely the camera to get.

Here's a review that might be helpful

http://www.camcorderinfo.com/content/Canon-Vixia-HG20-Camcorder-Review-35510/Performance.htm

And I still have to recommend the tape-based HV30 of the hard drive based HG20. Hard Drives are a hassle to work with. Of you can even get the AVCHD footage into your editor render times will be excruciating. HDV is much more time tested. Also 1440x1080 vs. 1920x1080 doesn't really make much of a difference. One is anamorphic and one isn't. 24p/25p is important though

Anamorphism has nothing to do with this. 1440X1080 vs 1920x1080 is a case of pixel aspect ratio. (1.33:1 in the case of HDV). 

Aside from the xDcam EX PMW-EX1 and EX3, few low end (under $50,000) camcorder offers true 1920x1080 pixel resolution. Even HDCAM (Not HDCAM SR, but the lower end ones) use 1440X1080. To understand it without going into highly technical terms, these cameras use rectangular pixels for their horizontal resolution so they have 1440 of them instead of 1920 of them. The sensors are then shifted by a fraction of a pixel in relation to each other to achieve a higher resolution. If you transfer it to a high end production codec such as Apple ProRES-422  or Avid Dnx at 1920X1080 they will be exactly the same size, just use a more, smaller pixels to fill in the frame horizontally.

Again, please understand that this is not the camera's resolution, but the codec's image playback size. Most cameras have much less resolving power than 1440X1080 (for example the native resolution of Panasonic HVX200 imaging CCD's is 960x540 while the Sony xDcam EX PMW-EX1 is 1920x1080. Yet on paper, they are both advertised as "1080p" capable.

 

 

 

Author
Time

Then this would work best: http://www.videocopilot.net/tutorials/frame_rate_converter/

I know Ady has After Effects, and this shows you how to convert to any framerate... Even includes aa free preset. If anyone wants to learn After Effects; you should drop what you're doing and go see that site...Tons of FREE info. He has software available and you'll notice it's not nearly has expensive as Magic Bullet, or other third party programs. Awesome stuff.

Author
Time
plastique45 said:
Octorox said:
adywan said:

i just realised that it is the HG-20 and not the 10 model that i tested out. the 10 doesn't film in 1920x1080p but 1440x1080 instead. i just rang up the shop that i tested it at and although their website lists the 10 model they assure me that its the 20 and they no longer stock the 10.

This is the lowest price i've been able to find for the Uk version

http://www.camerabox.co.uk/product.asp?ProductID=6388&gclid=CLGb6ZSf4ZgCFQHHGgodIGfYdQ

Its just over £100 more in the shop i tested it at but i'm still a couple of hundred quid off getting this baby.

I've been checking out some of the HD videos shot with this camera on youtube. This is definitely the camera to get.

Here's a review that might be helpful

http://www.camcorderinfo.com/content/Canon-Vixia-HG20-Camcorder-Review-35510/Performance.htm

And I still have to recommend the tape-based HV30 of the hard drive based HG20. Hard Drives are a hassle to work with. Of you can even get the AVCHD footage into your editor render times will be excruciating. HDV is much more time tested. Also 1440x1080 vs. 1920x1080 doesn't really make much of a difference. One is anamorphic and one isn't. 24p/25p is important though

Anamorphism has nothing to do with this. 1440X1080 vs 1920x1080 is a case of pixel aspect ratio. (1.33:1 in the case of HDV). 

Aside from the xDcam EX PMW-EX1 and EX3, few low end (under $50,000) camcorder offers true 1920x1080 pixel resolution. Even HDCAM (Not HDCAM SR, but the lower end ones) use 1440X1080. To understand it without going into highly technical terms, these cameras use rectangular pixels for their horizontal resolution so they have 1440 of them instead of 1920 of them. The sensors are then shifted by a fraction of a pixel in relation to each other to achieve a higher resolution. If you transfer it to a high end production codec such as Apple ProRES-422  or Avid Dnx at 1920X1080 they will be exactly the same size, just use a more, smaller pixels to fill in the frame horizontally.

Again, please understand that this is not the camera's resolution, but the codec's image playback size. Most cameras have much less resolving power than 1440X1080 (for example the native resolution of Panasonic HVX200 imaging CCD's is 960x540 while the Sony xDcam EX PMW-EX1 is 1920x1080. Yet on paper, they are both advertised as "1080p" capable.

 

 

 

This is true.

 

Author
Time

Insted of doing all that technical stuff...

 I say you get a simple Canon Digital Camera

  http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/e/eb/Ixus-p1010137.jpg

 

and reshoot the series scene for scene useing Star Wars Action figures!

http://gallery.racoonfink.com/d/8782-1/Star+Wars+-+Uncle+Owen+and+Aunt+Beru+Figure.jpg

Now that would be a Fan edit!

 

 

The final battle to decide the fate of the Earth is about to begin

 

Where are those cookies i wanted?!?!