Star Trek - The Pegasus (Released)

ESE stands for Enhanced Special Editions. And thats what we do. We enhance stories. We add scenes, take away scenes, add new special effects and restore old ones.

STAR TREK: THE PEGASUS

This FanEdit takes TNGs Pegasus, and incorporates footage from ENTs finale, These are the Voyages to created a TV movie length adventure. This new adventure offers an alternative view on two great episodes.

Please help seed as long as you are able.

Thanks to Pearlcorderman for his cover art and poster art.</span></span>

This is the second and final edition of this FanEdit.

Please contact me via PM for torrent download details.

Hopefully this improves on TATV, as the original episode was mediocre, to put it lightly.

I'll be giving this a download for sure, always have wanted to see how effective the two episodes combined would be.

Hope you enjoy. =]

Well, some of the transitions between the eps were a bit rough, but overall a great, solid edit. Loved the intro; who knew the universe sequence from Contact combined with Generations music would create such a moving opening credits? Again, great work! :)

I'm having some trouble finding the correct AR to watch this in as the eps were clearly different - TNG was 4:3 whilst Enterprise was 16:9...I'm not going to post up my thoughts until I'm able to watch it in the correct aspect - mostly as I don't want to have my viewing spoilt by something like this.

boon23 said:

and to share this with my fellow OT friends:
to me this is another piece of crap from vengeance. Those who can enjoy releases that are technically insufficient are of course welcome to enjoy it. I for one can't. It is the 10th, 15th 20th fanedit of this guy that has huge errors and should have never been released this way.
proof?



I stopped watching after 10 minutes. Maybe I missed the best parts of it, I think I did not. A proper release of this could be nice, but I am rather sure it will not come from vengeance.

Not everyone has access to the same equipment, software or skills.

Fan edits should be taken for what they are and not for what they are not.

If the aspect ratio mishmash is a serious problem why not do the same project only to your high standards and then we can enjoy that version (I'm sure that the editor didn't squish the picture just to annoy you).

Nobody gets paid to do fan edits and no one charges for them either. While it's correct to warn people of issues like this in case someone spends (via their broadband account) internet time downloading something that they will not ultimately enjoy but it's perhaps better form to do so in a supportive and constructive way.

Being poopy to fan-editors is a sure fire way of cutting the number of interesting projects that actually get finished.

boon23 said: 
If he released it as a "preview" this would have been no issue at all. But when he posts on places where people release good quality fanedits, he will be compared to them. And rightfully so.
This very faneditor here has a long history...
started with selling fanedits, claiming that the works of others were made by him, releasing unfinished bad quality works over and over again and always making big words about it, like he did this time.
Now you can of course attack me, because I am so mean and criticize poor vengeance for another crappy release, but you can also may dig a bit and get informed where this reaction might come from.

I made my comments as point of principle.

If what you say about this editor is true (and he/she/they attempted in the past to make money out of piracy) that should have been entered into your post to flesh out your reasons for taking the tone that you chose.

It's unreasonable to expect everyone who posts on this forum to know the full history of everyone else who posts here, we do all have lives beyond this organ.

Anything we post on here is free to be countered, counter-countered and counter-counter-countered by anyone who reads it and taken in isolation your previous post regarding this project (which I have yet to see so I can't comment on it) did come across as I previously described it "poopy".

If the 'poopy hat' doesn't fit, you are well within your rights not to put the article on but if the aspect ratio is the one thing you really can't stand about this edit, show the chap how it should be done (don't try to make money off it) and take a well deserved bow. I always applaud a job well done.

boon23 said:

just what I need, old drama to return. :)

LOL It sure did not take you long to spot it and respond to fuel this drama some more though did it?

We are not talking about some 30 seconds streaming youtube video. I for sure would not want to spend hours downloading a movie with changing AR all along.

Boon was not really bashing this guy (this is why he did not tell all the past events surrounding him in the first place) he just warned us about the quality.

Boon said: "Those who can enjoy releases that are technically insufficient are of course welcome to enjoy it." This line can be taken as ironic, but it is also actualy just plain true.