Sevb32 said:Jake was 9 & Natalie was had just turned 16 a month or so before filming those scenes in TPM, and there was nothing sexual about them, so I don't get what the problem is. The two don't hook up until 10 years later. Geez.
Well, it's that we know they're supposed to "hook up", so when 16 year-old Natalie (really? She was that young?) turned around for no reason other than to smile at 8-year-old Jake What's-is'face (who if I recall almost did a Quagmire wink right back at her), yeeeah it was kinda creepy knowing that that 8-year-old kid was going to get into Natalie's pants in the near future.
This is interesting because usually it's the other way around.... you know, a 40-year-old Harrison Ford getting into a 21-year-old Carrie Fischer (have any of you watched BUILDING EMPIRE yet? When they're talking about filming the Hoth scenes and how Carrie Fischer didn't have to be there yet still came anyways, I found that to be somewhat funny... as well as the "unscripted arguments" stuff. I don't know what is STAR WARS canon or not, but I know one thing is for sure: Princess Leia was definitely following Han Solo's canon, if you know what I mean... nudge, nudge, wink, wink, say no more).
Bingowings said:George does have a wonky view of romance.
The scenes between little (not yet orphan) Annie and Padme in "The Phantom Menace" make for very difficult viewing.
ohhhh boy... I just got it... little orphan Annie? Did Lucas slip in one of his stupid '30's homage jokes?