rcb said:Vaderisnothayden said:rcb said:Vaderisnothayden said:rcb said:however, she said she just remembered images and feelings. and obviously was told by her adoptive parents, her mother died when she was young.
It was clear from what she said that she remembered her mother. And she said her mother died when she was young but she didn't say "My mother died when I was newborn." She clearly meant later.
well, u can just take the line, "she died when i was very young" that would work.
What do you mean take the line? Take out the line? Why should a classic's story be changed to suit later inferior spinoff films? Why don't we just take out Padme's death scene? That's the thing that obviously shouldn't have been put in.
i meant take that line out.
and no, padme should die, otherwise u'd have even more gaps. questions would pop up saying, "did she marry bail?" "how did she die?" and so on. whether u like it or not, it stays.
It's much more appropriate to delay Padme's death to years later, in keeping with the established story. They can end the film some years after the main events if they like, to include her death.
Taking out a line from a classic film to fit in with a crap spinoff film is an obscene idea.
yes there are flaws. but still they blew me away. the music, action, and storytelling, aside from the romance, really delivered.
The action was tedious, the music was overdone, the storytelling was crap. In two of those films there was very little apart from flaws.
AxiaEuxine said:no, not denial. I love the prequels, sorry they didnt fullfill your expectations but I love them.
I find it little hard to believe that anybody could love AOTC and ROTS. What is there to love? There's no heart or soul in those films.